India's blunt spearhead

[Lord]

So lets cut batsman's runs they score from part time bowlers :banghead:

so you'll rate a batsman who gets majority of runs v part timers and struggles v main bowlers same as one who gets them against main bowlers?

[Texan]

http://www.espncricinfo.com/india-v-australia-2013-14/content/video_audio/679383.html This was the interview. Listen from 5:00 onwards, if you listen to the entire quote, it comes out totally differently.

Yes, it does sound a lot different from the way it was reported, but still - nothing about Ishant leaking runs.

[msb1991]

Look at Jason Holder. He has barely started his career. Already executes his yorkers very well.

Holder is a very good prospect. He's got to get ahead of Rampaul, Roach or Best to get a Test spot though. He's only 21 though so his time will no doubt come.

[msb1991]

so you'll rate a batsman who gets majority of runs v part timers and struggles v main bowlers same as one who gets them against main bowlers?

Not the same, but you cannot ignore those runs. Part timers can get wickets, tailenders can get runs.

[Ibes]

During the CT when Dravid was doing those Post-Match analyses he hinted at the fact that Ishant wasn't how you say the smartest guy out there. He also said he preferred VK for his death bowling so you can take that any way you want.

[Laaloo]

During the CT when Dravid was doing those Post-Match analyses he hinted at the fact that Ishant wasn't how you say the smartest guy out there. He also said he preferred VK for his death bowling so you can take that any way you want.

Well Dravid loves giving interviews these days on everything out there. Implying his preference for VK also show that he's not the smartest guys out there

[The Realist]

During the CT when Dravid was doing those Post-Match analyses he hinted at the fact that Ishant wasn't how you say the smartest guy out there. He also said he preferred VK for his death bowling so you can take that any way you want.

You don't Dravid to spell out that Sharma is dumber than a squashed turd. He is the most retarded bowler in world cricket today by a country mile, just beyond stupid.

[cowboysfan]

Ishant's main problem is he is borderline an imbecile ,he has no clue about bowling.We would not be talking about dropping him if he had half the acumen of Zak.

[goose]

I hate the way he gives off an air of accomplishment after his follow through, like he's just happy to have sent the ball somewhere in the vicinity of 5th stump. What a pile of horse.

[rkt.india]

Ishant's main problem is he is borderline an imbecile ' date='he has no clue about bowling.We would not be talking about dropping him if he had half the acumen of Zak.[/quote'] He had everything in CB series 2008 but when your basics are not at the right place and you cannot execute things because of flawed basics, anyone will look imbecile. He changed thing sin his approach too soon in 2009 and went downhill after that.

[goose]

India's blunt spare part, more like.

[goose]

fool. pFFrN6tP4vU

[vayuu1]

i think kunt would have been appropriate for pissant,him and vinay are exactly bowling like that.

[Clarke]

hah, you thought he was bowling wicket taking deliveries earlier ? Its all the same hit me stuff from this jackass, its just that the hits are not finding the fielders any more.

[vijay50]

This useless feckerr lost the match from winning position.

[Texan]

Again and again and again. What a freaking loser!

[randomGuy]

:hysterical:Ishant ......and dhoni.

[Texan]

And what a rubbish captain to persist with this piece of *****!!!!

[Texan]

Unlucky Ishant should be changed to the luckiest b@$*** on the face of this earth

[Texan]

Even Virat Kohli would have bowled that over better than that dumb bimbo!!!!