mishra Posted July 27, 2015 Posted July 27, 2015 This is how BBC reports the news. I rmemeber, For Mumbai they called them Millitant(Not terrorist). Now they call them "attackers" http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-33671593 Gurdaspur attack: Nine killed in Indian police station siege It doesn't qualify as terrorist attack unless British/American citizens are killed or it happens on British/American soil. Pretty PC and lame reporting by BBC. :facepalm:
rageaddict Posted July 27, 2015 Posted July 27, 2015 Any official confirmation about who was behind the attack ?
mishra Posted July 27, 2015 Posted July 27, 2015 Any official confirmation about who was behind the attack ? Looks like it took time because because officials wanted to catch one alive. It was defiitely Mubai style attack which started at bus station. BBC says, "attackers" were from "Indian Administered Kashmir".
The Realist Posted July 27, 2015 Posted July 27, 2015 The heavily-armed fidayeen attackers, believed to have come from Pakistan, sprayed bullets on a moving bus in a pre-dawn strike around 5 am and then stormed a police station in what was the first major terror attack in the state in eight years. The terrorists, suspected to be members of either Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) or Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM), also targeted a roadside eatery. http://m.indiatoday.in/story/gurdaspur-terrorists-had-ak-47-grenades-says-punjb-dgp/1/454440.html
Sachin=GOD Posted July 27, 2015 Posted July 27, 2015 The SWAT team did not even have bullet proof jackets. As for the Punjab Police - they were in their normal police uniform with no protection gear at all. We just never learn from past mistakes.
randomGuy Posted July 27, 2015 Posted July 27, 2015 This is how BBC reports the news. I rmemeber, For Mumbai they called them Millitant(Not terrorist). Now they call them "attackers" http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-33671593 Gurdaspur attack: Nine killed in Indian police station siege It doesn't qualify as terrorist attack unless British/American citizens are killed or it happens on British/American soil. Pretty PC and lame reporting by BBC. :facepalm: Looks like it took time because because officials wanted to catch one alive. It was defiitely Mubai style attack which started at bus station. BBC says, "attackers" were from "Indian Administered Kashmir". Since India = 120 Cr = 1/6th of humanity, and BBC doesn't even represent Britain (infact British are aware of dangers of jihadis) , we should do well by not giving the likes of bbc unnecessary relevance.
Anitha Posted July 27, 2015 Posted July 27, 2015 Rest In Peace. Hope BJP understand that Pakistan can never be trusted. Hope Modi has realised his monumemtal mistake at UFA. And that is why you break all relations with this country. Send all their bhikaris back to their country. But isn't this what Paki army wants in the first place? Hence every attack comes after peace is discussed with Paki government? So let Paki army win again?
adi B Posted July 27, 2015 Posted July 27, 2015 Looks like it took time because because officials wanted to catch one alive. It was defiitely Mubai style attack which started at bus station. BBC says, "attackers" were from "Indian Administered Kashmir". Lol bbc
amiret Posted July 27, 2015 Posted July 27, 2015 If we're hit, we will give befitting reply, says Rajnath Singh So this HIT was not enough ?
Number Posted July 27, 2015 Posted July 27, 2015 India should start open support for Balochistan liberation. This mother****er Paki army will never learn untill we tear their land into 100 pieces.
Gollum Posted July 27, 2015 Posted July 27, 2015 Next time there is a terror attack in England, how about we call it "backpackers cause inconvenience to public". Criminal news agency !!!
Shivaji bhonsle Posted July 27, 2015 Posted July 27, 2015 Lets see what Ajith Doval does in response.
gattaca Posted July 27, 2015 Posted July 27, 2015 RIP. But still few folks here still log on to paki forums. stop supporting them.
RohitSharma264 Posted July 27, 2015 Posted July 27, 2015 Feeling sad for CNN-IBN and likes, some of our resident ICF posters were also in rush to label it as Khalistan Terrorist attack. CNN-IBN repeatedly shouted 'Sikh' Militants. Khalistan support in Punjab is like a random person in the metro wearing a Che Guevera T-shirt having nothing to do with communism. More than 90% Punjabi Sikhs do passively support the Khalistan movement but don't really do anything about it. In Pakistan, there was a movement known as the Jinnahpur movement. People of Karachi and Punjab know realities, but remaining of Pakistan and India still believes in false accusation of Jinnahpur and Khalistan. The Sikhs have always served the country and to treat them in such a manner is a national shame. The mainstream media should know how to deal with their own nationals and how to treat them. If the Indian Government was to re-gain the confidence of the Sikhs, by bringing to justice those responsible for the massacre of innocent Sikhs, support for Khalistan (as a separate country) would naturally disappear; the harsh reality, however, is that Indian Government will never will be able to given justice to the Sikhs. Sikhs who have already served over and above any sentence considered to be life imprisonment in various Indian Jails should be freed.
Anitha Posted July 27, 2015 Posted July 27, 2015 There is only two options. Attack Pak and surgically take out militants. Or work with Pak civilian government to rein in their military. Internet outrage will not yield anything. Good that BJP is in power and not congress
zen Posted July 27, 2015 Posted July 27, 2015 There is only two options. Attack Pak and surgically take out militants. Or work with Pak civilian government to rein in their military. Internet outrage will not yield anything. Good that BJP is in power and not congress When it comes to Ind, both civilian and military are likely to have similar policies .... for e.g. it is said that Nawaz knew that there was going to happen in Kargil when he received ABV .... Mushraff was actually chosen by him iirc and it is believed that he even told Musharraf - "Kashmir kab dilwa rahe ho"
Desi Cartman Posted July 27, 2015 Posted July 27, 2015 Why do you people even care for BBC, how does it matter what they say?
Sachin=GOD Posted July 27, 2015 Posted July 27, 2015 Why do you people even care for BBC' date=' how does it matter what they say?[/quote'] A reputed (yes, BBC still has a good reputation in many countries) news organization is spreading misinformation about a terrorist attack in India. Why shouldn't that matter?
Lannister Posted July 27, 2015 Posted July 27, 2015 Terrorists shouted Allah hu Akbar: reports A Hindustan Times report said that Punjab Police personnel on Monday heard terrorists shout 'Allah hu Akbar' — Arabic for 'God is great' — as a gunfight between the attackers and security forces in Gurdaspur entered its 10th hour, indicating the assault was a suicide attack. The daily quoting Punjab Police said that Khalistani militants were not known to carry out such suicide attacks. When ever there is a terrorist attack, you can be certain that there are Muslims involved. No surprises there.
Texy Posted July 27, 2015 Posted July 27, 2015 Look at the condition of those police officers. Stomach bulging out of their trousers. So ill-prepared. It's a miracle that India doesn't get attacked everyday. It's like everyone is sleep walking. Attack happens, everyone is active for few days then back to "Chalta hai" attitude. No coordination, no system in place...everyone is just going about their days.
Recommended Posts