Jump to content

ANTI MVFC/Anti-MONK Club

beetle

By beetle
in Cricket Talk

Recommended Posts

maniac Grand Master

maniac

Posted
Posted (edited)

M.Vijay may not be a player who will singlehandly win games when in the zone

 

he may not have the skills to create miracles

 

he may not be a player who will change games in a session

 

he may not be a entertainment-a-minute kind of player

 

he may lack aggression,flair and the xfactor

 

He may not have the ease of making the game look easy  or the elegance 

 

He may not be a player you would pay a $1000 and travel 1000 miles to watch

 

what he has is temperament and patience.

 

players like this show that while cricket may be an entertainment where flair and excitement thrives there is still a place for these players to run a successful team :nice:

 

Vijay kind of players may not cater to my personal taste but boy I would want a player like that in any team I support....classy,old school and mr.dependable

Edited by maniac
sandeep Grand Master

sandeep

Posted
Posted

M00Li along with Pujara form the spine of the Indian batting around which the flash-dancers do their thing.  Even Rahane, who I think skill-wise is the best test bat, is not dependable enough to do that job.  

beetle Rising Star

beetle

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, Malcolm Merlyn said:

 

You also did panauti of Bhuvi.

no:afraid:....

I never started a club for him.:alberteinstein:jo kuch kiya ya nahi kiya...woh ussi ne kiya.:drama:

Texan Grand Master

Texan

Posted
Posted

MV is actually a technically sound player and has been fairly consistent between 2013 - 2016. Unfortunately, he has started having way too many lapses of concentration of late and he is throwing away any starts. Today's dismissal was as disappointing as it gets and does not suit him at all. I still think he is a good opener, just needs to sort some stuff out mentally. But if Rahul is fit for next match and Parthiv goes on and gets a decent score and Nair does well too, then MV could well miss out the next game.

Texan Grand Master

Texan

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, fineleg said:

Was there a clear snicko showing out if england had taken a review IF doofus had not walked on his own? Umpire call was not out so if doubt on DRS - it was umpires call. Real stupid by m vijay

 

@Cricketics

Fairly clear.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...