Muloghonto Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 14 hours ago, coffee_rules said: SC verdict tomorrow! Have a sinking feeling since today's verdict on Adultery law is seen as a loss for Feminists, tomorrow will be in their favor. You have a remarkable ability to spout illogical nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarke Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 The opinions of the bench are quite interesting. All the male justices (Nariman, Chandrachud, Khanwilkar, Misra) called it discriminatory and said it violated rights of hindu women, the lone female justice Malhotra also brought in some sense: It is not for courts to determine which religious practices are to be struck down except in issues of social evil like 'Sati' Right to equality conflicts with right to worship of devotees of Lord Ayyappa Notions of rationality cannot be brought into matters of religion Religious practices can't solely be tested on the basis of the right to equality. It's up to the worshippers, not the court to decide what's religion's essential practice Issue in this case not limited to Sabarimala only. It'll have far reaching implications for other places of worships The last statement is the most worrying part, not all sections of society are ready for the up to date views of the courts and it could have some heavier reactions which need to be absorbed. UrmiSinhaRay and Stradlater 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UrmiSinhaRay Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 The opinions of the bench are quite interesting. All the male justices (Nariman, Chandrachud, Khanwilkar, Misra) called it discriminatory and said it violated rights of hindu women, the lone female justice Malhotra also brought in some sense: It is not for courts to determine which religious practices are to be struck down except in issues of social evil like 'Sati' Right to equality conflicts with right to worship of devotees of Lord Ayyappa Notions of rationality cannot be brought into matters of religion Religious practices can't solely be tested on the basis of the right to equality. It's up to the worshippers, not the court to decide what's religion's essential practice Issue in this case not limited to Sabarimala only. It'll have far reaching implications for other places of worships The last statement is the most worrying part, not all sections of society are ready for the up to date views of the courts and it could have some heavier reactions which need to be absorbed. The woman justice actually makes sense LolChandrachud is a egoistic nutcase though.Know him personally Sent from my SM-A710F using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarke Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 1 hour ago, UrmiSinhaRay said: The woman justice actually makes sense Lol Chandrachud is a egoistic nutcase though. Know him personally Sent from my SM-A710F using Tapatalk You should use this phone cover Stradlater, flamy, UrmiSinhaRay and 1 other 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beetle Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 19 hours ago, coffee_rules said: SC verdict tomorrow! Have a sinking feeling since today's verdict on Adultery law is seen as a loss for Feminists, tomorrow will be in their favor. Why do you feel the ' adultery' verdict is a loss for feminists? You really do not understand the issue at all. Infact it is a victory for feminists because women now get treated as equal and not as the property of husband. Seriously man....how difficult is is to understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rageaddict Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 (edited) These 4-5 Judges are setting rules for a country of Billion plus people as if it's their Baap ki Jagir and everyone must obey them. Yeh toh dadagiri ho gayi ki Bhai Hum Decide karenge ki tumko apna religion kaise practice Karna chahiye. Edited September 28, 2018 by rageaddict UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarke Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 (edited) 31 minutes ago, beetle said: Why do you feel the ' adultery' verdict is a loss for feminists? You really do not understand the issue at all. Infact it is a victory for feminists because women now get treated as equal and not as the property of husband. Seriously man....how difficult is is to understand. A very intelligent friend I once met at a conference stated: I'm a feminist because I stand for gender equality, not any other meaning or interpretation out there. CR probably refers to the latter when he refers to feminists while you hopefully subscribe to the former. Equality though has its interpretations as well across spheres in society (e.g. religion) as is clear from the verdicts I mentioned above. Edited September 28, 2018 by Clarke beetle, UrmiSinhaRay and coffee_rules 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UrmiSinhaRay Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 Good now they should ban Hijab and Burkhas too.. Religion ke naam pe women ko oppress kar rahen hai yeh logSent from my CPH1609 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shunya Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 After this victory, next in line agenda for these feminists against hindu temples is "We should be allowed to wear whatever we want in these temples. Having a dress code is very regressive hinduism ritual and is against our freedom" UrmiSinhaRay and Stradlater 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, beetle said: Why do you feel the ' adultery' verdict is a loss for feminists? You really do not understand the issue at all. Infact it is a victory for feminists because women now get treated as equal and not as the property of husband. Seriously man....how difficult is is to understand. Tell this to your DCW chairperson who is tweeting that it is against women, people will have a free will to commit adultery and sanctity of marriage will be lost. Edited September 28, 2018 by coffee_rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stradlater Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 1 hour ago, Shunya said: After this victory, next in line agenda for these feminists against hindu temples is "We should be allowed to wear whatever we want in these temples. Having a dress code is very regressive hinduism ritual and is against our freedom" Should allow shorts in Temple premises. UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stradlater Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 This judgement shall set a extremely bad precedent I'm telling y'all. Shunya and UrmiSinhaRay 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shunya Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 9 minutes ago, Stradlater said: Should allow shorts in Temple premises. I dont mind that personally bcos of mostly hot and humid climate of India. I say anything should go, shorts or bikinis or whatever that makes it comfortable and easier. But then, when I actually think over it a bit and introspect, it all comes down to the same point - the whole idea of temples and traditions becomes useless. Why are we in need to convert these places in tourist spots. Might as well just go to beach and other places for fun. My personal opinion is I enjoy/participate in these traditions, rituals and festivals etc is actually because it is done/followed in certain way. If it was about my freedom, convenience n stuff than I would rather do something else. UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beetle Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 1 hour ago, coffee_rules said: Tell this to your DCW chairperson who is tweeting that it is against women, people will have a free will to commit adultery and sanctity of marriage will be lost. Wtf do you mean by your dcw chairperson!!! I don't even know who it is .... Whoever it is doesn't understand either sexism or equality/ feminism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted September 29, 2018 Share Posted September 29, 2018 15 hours ago, beetle said: Wtf do you mean by your dcw chairperson!!! I don't even know who it is .... Whoever it is doesn't understand either sexism or equality/ feminism. Delhi Commission of Women..said.. someone 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beetle Posted September 29, 2018 Share Posted September 29, 2018 5 minutes ago, coffee_rules said: 2 hours ago, coffee_rules said: Delhi Commission of Women..said.. Maliwal is an idiot. She is being sanskari.....not feminist. Like most people , she doesn't even seem to know the law. UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikhil_cric Posted October 1, 2018 Share Posted October 1, 2018 A very poor decision by the Supreme Court. Hindus should campaign to take temples away from the control of the government . The government should not have any say in the manner of worship and Hindus should stop giving even a penny to temples like sabarimala which goes to government coffers. Stradlater and UrmiSinhaRay 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Singh bling Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 Thiruvananthapuram comes to standstill as Sabarimala protest heads for a massive showdown https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/thiruvananthapuram-comes-to-standstill-as-sabarimala-protest-heads-for-a-massive-showdown-1368336-2018-10-15 BJP cornering commies on this issue UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted October 17, 2018 Share Posted October 17, 2018 This Trupti Desai is no bhakt, going there just to prove a f'in point. After a similar thing in Shani Shingnapur temple in Maharastra,after a few feminist activities created bawaal and entered the temple, nobody locally is defying the traditon and entering the temple. So, it is only for a show, nothing religious. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/shani-shingnapur-temple-a-year-after-breakthrough-moment-local-women-stick-to-entry-ban/story-klA7Cu1ry70yz1VFXVqSRP.html UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts