Jump to content

Should Allow All Women In Sabarimala Temple, Kerala Tells Supreme Court

Malcolm Merlyn

By Malcolm Merlyn
in Chit Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

Muloghonto Grand Master

Muloghonto

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

SC verdict tomorrow!  Have a sinking feeling since today's verdict on Adultery law is seen as a loss for Feminists, tomorrow will be in their favor. :fear: 

You have a remarkable ability to spout illogical nonsense. 

Clarke Mentor

Clarke

Posted
Posted

The opinions of the bench are quite interesting. All the male justices (Nariman, Chandrachud, Khanwilkar, Misra) called it discriminatory and said it violated rights of hindu women, the lone female justice Malhotra also brought in some sense:

 

It is not for courts to determine which religious practices are to be struck down except in issues of social evil like 'Sati'

Right to equality conflicts with right to worship of devotees of Lord Ayyappa

Notions of rationality cannot be brought into matters of religion

Religious practices can't solely be tested on the basis of the right to equality. It's up to the worshippers, not the court to decide what's religion's essential practice

Issue in this case not limited to Sabarimala only. It'll have far reaching implications for other places of worships

 

The last statement is the most worrying part, not all sections of society are ready for the up to date views of the courts and it could have some heavier reactions which need to be absorbed. 

UrmiSinhaRay Newbie

UrmiSinhaRay

Posted
Posted
The opinions of the bench are quite interesting. All the male justices (Nariman, Chandrachud, Khanwilkar, Misra) called it discriminatory and said it violated rights of hindu women, the lone female justice Malhotra also brought in some sense:
 
It is not for courts to determine which religious practices are to be struck down except in issues of social evil like 'Sati'
Right to equality conflicts with right to worship of devotees of Lord Ayyappa
Notions of rationality cannot be brought into matters of religion
Religious practices can't solely be tested on the basis of the right to equality. It's up to the worshippers, not the court to decide what's religion's essential practice
Issue in this case not limited to Sabarimala only. It'll have far reaching implications for other places of worships
 
The last statement is the most worrying part, not all sections of society are ready for the up to date views of the courts and it could have some heavier reactions which need to be absorbed. 
The woman justice actually makes sense
Lol
Chandrachud is a egoistic nutcase though.
Know him personally

Sent from my SM-A710F using Tapatalk

beetle Rising Star

beetle

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

SC verdict tomorrow!  Have a sinking feeling since today's verdict on Adultery law is seen as a loss for Feminists, tomorrow will be in their favor. :fear: 

Why do you feel  the ' adultery' verdict is a loss for feminists?

You really do not understand the issue at all.

Infact it is a victory for feminists because women now get treated as equal and not as the property of husband.

 

Seriously man....how difficult is is to understand.:facepalm:

rageaddict Grand Master

rageaddict

Posted
Posted (edited)

These 4-5 Judges are setting rules for a country of Billion plus people as if it's their Baap ki Jagir and everyone must obey them. 

 

Yeh toh dadagiri ho gayi ki Bhai Hum Decide karenge ki tumko apna religion kaise practice Karna chahiye. 

Edited by rageaddict
Clarke Mentor

Clarke

Posted
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, beetle said:

Why do you feel  the ' adultery' verdict is a loss for feminists?

You really do not understand the issue at all.

Infact it is a victory for feminists because women now get treated as equal and not as the property of husband.

 

Seriously man....how difficult is is to understand.:facepalm:

A very intelligent friend I once met at a conference stated: I'm a feminist because I stand for gender equality, not any other meaning or interpretation out there. CR probably refers to the latter when he refers to feminists while you hopefully subscribe to the former. 

 

Equality though has its interpretations as well across spheres in society (e.g. religion) as is clear from the verdicts I mentioned above. 

Edited by Clarke
coffee_rules Grand Master

coffee_rules

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, beetle said:

Why do you feel  the ' adultery' verdict is a loss for feminists?

You really do not understand the issue at all.

Infact it is a victory for feminists because women now get treated as equal and not as the property of husband.

 

Seriously man....how difficult is is to understand.:facepalm:

Tell this to your DCW chairperson who is tweeting that it is against women, people will have a free will to commit adultery and sanctity of marriage will be lost.

Edited by coffee_rules
Stradlater Rookie

Stradlater

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Shunya said:

After this victory, next in line agenda for these feminists against hindu temples is "We should be allowed to wear whatever we want in these temples. Having a dress code is very regressive hinduism ritual and is against our freedom"

 

Should allow shorts in Temple premises.

 

Shunya Newbie

Shunya

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Stradlater said:

Should allow shorts in Temple premises.

 

I dont mind that personally bcos of mostly hot and humid climate of India. I say anything should go, shorts or bikinis or whatever that makes it comfortable and easier.

 

But then, when I actually think over it a bit and introspect, it all comes down to the same point - the whole idea of temples and traditions becomes useless. Why are we in need to convert these places in tourist spots. Might as well just go to beach and other places for fun. My personal opinion is I enjoy/participate in these traditions, rituals and festivals etc is actually because it is done/followed in certain way. If it was about my freedom, convenience n stuff than I would rather do something else. 

beetle Rising Star

beetle

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, coffee_rules said:

Tell this to your DCW chairperson who is tweeting that it is against women, people will have a free will to commit adultery and sanctity of marriage will be lost.

Wtf do you mean by your dcw chairperson!!!

I don't even know who it is ....

Whoever it is doesn't understand either sexism or equality/ feminism.

beetle Rising Star

beetle

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:
2 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

Delhi Commission of Women..said..

 

 

Maliwal is an idiot.

She is being sanskari.....not feminist.

Like most people , she doesn't even seem to know the law.

 

 

Nikhil_cric Grand Master

Nikhil_cric

Posted
Posted

A very poor decision by the Supreme Court. Hindus should campaign to take temples away from the control of the government . The government should not have any say in the manner of worship and Hindus should stop giving even a penny to temples like sabarimala which goes to government coffers. 

coffee_rules Grand Master

coffee_rules

Posted
Posted

This Trupti Desai is no bhakt, going there just to prove a f'in point.

After a similar thing in Shani Shingnapur temple in Maharastra,after a few feminist activities created bawaal and entered the temple,  nobody locally  is defying the traditon and entering the temple. So, it is only for a show, nothing religious. 

 

https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/shani-shingnapur-temple-a-year-after-breakthrough-moment-local-women-stick-to-entry-ban/story-klA7Cu1ry70yz1VFXVqSRP.html

 

 

 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...