Jump to content

So how long is the rope for Saha?


Austin 3:!6

Recommended Posts

Posted
35 minutes ago, New guy said:

Saha could have closed his eyes, showed the bowler his behind, reach out from under his legs and still taken those catches. 

Same way he hits the balls.

Posted
26 minutes ago, adi B said:

 

What's the proof saha doesn't score a ton here ?

No proof at all. What is the proof that Patel doest'nt score a ton in the last match? No proof once again.

 

All we know as a matter of fact is Patel can easily score more runs than Saha.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Khota said:

Saha would have never scored 19 under these conditions.

Two things wrong with your post:

- compared to the 1st test, this is a road. The scores of batsmen on both teams is proof enough.

- re Parthiv's score, the relevant number is not 19, but -33. Saha scored more in tougher conditions (namely in the 1st test)

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Khota said:

No proof at all. What is the proof that Patel doest'nt score a ton in the last match? No proof once again.

 

All we know as a matter of fact is Patel can easily score more runs than Saha.

The role itself is called “wicket keeper”....if Bumrah is as good a bat as Kohli but bowls worse than Kohli he should be competing for the batsman spot not the bowlers spot...isn’t that simple enough?

 

didnt you say allrounders are like unicorns? 

 

Patel might be marginally better batbthan Saha-debatable but he doesn’t deserve to be ahead of Saha in the keeper role-period!!!

Edited by maniac
Posted
4 minutes ago, abc said:

Two things wrong with your post:

- compared to the 1st test, this is a road. The scores of batsmen on both teams is proof enough.

- re Parthiv's score, the relevant number is not 19, but -33. Saha scored more in tougher conditions (namely in the 1st test)

This is a easier wkt but Saha could have been consistent and be out for duck just like first innings.

 

You think taking runs away from catches is so cute. No one knows if Saha would have taken that catch.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Khota said:

This is a easier wkt but Saha could have been consistent and be out for duck just like first innings.

 

You think taking runs away from catches is so cute. No one knows if Saha would have taken that catch.

Everyone apart from yourself and @Rasgulla knows Saha would have taken those catches.

So you leave us all out that Nobody claim.

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, maniac said:

The role itself is called “wicket keeper”....if Bumrah is as good a bat as Kohli but bowls worse than Kohli he should be competing for the batsman spot not the bowlers spot...isn’t that simple enough?

 

didnt you say allrounders are like unicorns? 

 

Patel might be marginally better batbthan Saha-debatable but he doesn’t deserve to be ahead of Saha in the keeper role-period!!!

It is a role of wkt kpr but to be competitive you have to score runs. If you cant you are already a batsman down.

 

I still maintain that all rounders are like unicorns. I still have not seen one.

 

I expect runs from a wkt kpr and I am not so sure that Saha is an upgrade.

Posted
Just now, Khota said:

It is a role of wkt kpr but to be competitive you have to score runs. If you cant you are already a batsman down.

 

I still maintain that all rounders are like unicorns. I still have not seen one.

 

I expect runs from a wkt kpr and I am not so sure that Saha is an upgrade.

Agreed, to be a great team you need at least good batsman in WK. Look for Pant over Parthiv in future. 

Posted
17 minutes ago, BeautifulGame said:

Everyone apart from yourself and @Rasgulla knows Saha would have taken those catches.

So you leave us all out that Nobody claim.

 

You must have some supernaturals powers that you know that catch would have been taken.

Posted
18 minutes ago, lamellavig said:

Agreed, to be a great team you need at least good batsman in WK. Look for Pant over Parthiv in future. 

Sensible post. I would have Karthick over all these guys but I get hate for that also. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, beetle said:

The two guys with potty mouths.....you are not kohli, you won't get away with it.:police:consider this a warning.

I hope you are not pointing at me. I categorically dislike this kind of language but it is a cultural thing in Delhi. As a matter of fact this was mild. You will never find me using this language. Never ever.

Posted
1 minute ago, Khota said:

I hope you are not pointing at me. I categorically dislike this kind of language but it is a cultural thing in Delhi. As a matter of fact this was mild. You will never find me using this language. Never ever.

Rasgulla and gollum

Posted
5 minutes ago, beetle said:

Rasgulla and gollum

They are good people. In the heat of the moment people get carried away so you need to look the other way. you are a nice person too. We all are flawed in our ways.

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Khota said:

They are good people. In the heat of the moment people get carried away so you need to look the other way. you are a nice person too. We all are flawed in our ways.

Mods have to look and do something or soon icf will be like u tube comments section.:bebored:

Edited by beetle

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...