Jump to content

Why this partiality??


Recommended Posts

Posted

In the absence of Kohli, Ashwin should have been the captain. Don't you think so?

Why always bowlers are not given their due respect.

 

Going to deeper question, why Ashwin was not vice-captain??

 

In any which way you see, Ashwin deserves it.

Posted

We have not seen enough of Rahane's strategies either way to make any conclusive remarks about him. Is he going to be loud and aggressive on the field? We know he won't.  But can he be better than Kohli with field placings and bowler management? There is probably room there.

Posted

it s not about rahane good or bad......but we all know, ASHWIN has been doing wonderfully well for so long across all the formats......he seems to have really good cricketing sense

 

And also, india never favored bowling captains......its been always been an enigma for me

Posted
2 minutes ago, gakgupta said:

it s not about rahane good or bad......but we all know, ASHWIN has been doing wonderfully well for so long across all the formats......he seems to have really good cricketing sense

 

And also, india never favored bowling captains......its been always been an enigma for me

Ashwin can't be captain because his place isn't certain when we tour overseas.

 

And also because Rahane looks a very calming influence on the team like Dravid used to be , so good choice in that regard tooand he has lead the exemplary today to prove his worth.

 

As for India not having bowling captains , it's not just us most teams don't prefer .Because 1) As a bowler u have a lot of of thinking up to do about how to set up batsmen and being captain has always to think about the game at all moments.That generally can mess up a bowler's mindset.Being captain and batsman is much easier.

Another is Bowlers as captain always have a tendency to under bowl themselves.

 

So teams mostly prefer batsman as captain.There is no partiality in it .

Posted
7 hours ago, Ultimate_Game said:

I would take anyone over Rahane as captain. What leadership qualities selectors see in him is baffling. He seems to be a "yes man" sort of a guy who's not a natural leader. What a joke.

Being calm doesn't make u a yes man and being expressive doesn't make u natural leader.

Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Pujara is the daddy of them all, if he can captain ROI, why not India? Debut in 2010. He has never got his due because of flashy players and he had to fight for his place with the likes of Rohit.

Overseas tours probably hurt his chances. I remember him being touted as next skipper after Dhoni on ICF. 

 

Him being dropped for Raina and Rohit is comfortably the worst decision taken by Kohli in terms of selection.

Edited by Sidhoni

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...