Trichromatic Posted April 15, 2017 Posted April 15, 2017 IPL > Indian FC cricket, test cricket and ODI cricket combined.
BCCI Posted April 15, 2017 Posted April 15, 2017 18 minutes ago, Trichromatic said: IPL > Indian FC cricket, test cricket and ODI cricket combined. Al though you are trying to be sarcastic but I think both Pandya brothers have more potential than Pathans.Anyways the premise of the this topic is strange ,one cant compare Pathans (in prime) with Pandyas(whose prime is yet to be seen). sandeep 1
Trichromatic Posted April 15, 2017 Posted April 15, 2017 1 minute ago, BCCI said: Al though you are trying to be sarcastic but I think both Pandya brothers have more potential than Pathans.Anyways the premise of the this topic is strange ,one cant compare Pathans (in prime) with Pandyas(whose prime is yet to be seen). Yes, let Pandyas perform in domestic cricket first then we can compare them with Pathans.
BCCI Posted April 15, 2017 Posted April 15, 2017 14 minutes ago, Trichromatic said: Yes, let Pandyas perform in domestic cricket first then we can compare them with Pathans. Both are performing well I guess.
Sandeep99 Posted April 16, 2017 Posted April 16, 2017 On 4/14/2017 at 5:35 PM, sandeep said: Hardik is 50% the bowler that Irfan was, and probably about the same level as a batsman, but with a different set of strengths and weaknesses. Yusuf in his prime - 2009-2011 - was a very effective slugger down the order. Sure he wasn't a great "batsman" technically. But he could and did bludgeon his way to a lot of runs against all types of bowling. Don't forget he scored an ODI 100 in South Africa - not exactly flat tracks or weak bowling team that. Pandyas have done well at the IPL level, but have a long way to go to match what the Pathans have done. 50% of Irfan is an exaggeration. Surely less than that. You summed up my post. I agree.
Trichromatic Posted April 16, 2017 Posted April 16, 2017 22 hours ago, BCCI said: Both are performing well I guess. Hardik has player few games and has been ok. Not very good performer at that level. Krunal has played one FC game.
Ankit_sharma03 Posted April 16, 2017 Posted April 16, 2017 2 hours ago, sarchasm said: Really do not get the ooohs and ahhs Irfan elicits from Indian fans. He was one of the most chicken hearted player ever to play for India. No amount of supposed talent can overcome that. Chicken hearted cricketer how?????
sandeep Posted April 16, 2017 Posted April 16, 2017 5 hours ago, sarchasm said: Really do not get the ooohs and ahhs Irfan elicits from Indian fans. He was one of the most chicken hearted player ever to play for India. No amount of supposed talent can overcome that. That's a baseless statement. Irfan made wrong choices in training in an attempt to increase his pace that didn't quite work and actually backfired - also got injured a few times, as bowlers often do. Ended up with an underwhelming career graph relative to the potential and promise that he flashed early on. Don't mistake your personal disappointment with his output into false slander.
Sooda Posted April 22, 2017 Posted April 22, 2017 (edited) Irfan was anything but unfit, chicken hearted (lol), and lazy as some people put it. if anything he was the opposite, trying to increase his pace and working on his batting to the detriment of what he was best at. He was, at his best, a very good ODI bowler and all rounder. Key player under Chappell when for a while India were a good ODI team. Dont forget he was man of the match when India won in Perth in 08 (?) , key component of Jeet lo dil series win in Pak and T20 WC win... amongst other things... He was a sad case of what might have been. Edited April 22, 2017 by Sooda
Pollack Posted April 22, 2017 Posted April 22, 2017 On 17/04/2017 at 0:08 AM, nospam said: The Waugh Brothers > [insert lame bros here] Andy flower,Grant flower.
BCCI Posted April 22, 2017 Posted April 22, 2017 On 4/17/2017 at 0:08 AM, nospam said: The Waugh Brothers > [insert lame bros here]
DDfan2017 Posted April 22, 2017 Posted April 22, 2017 I prefer Amarnath brothers- Mohinder- Surinder OpeningBatsman 1
vvvslaxman Posted April 22, 2017 Posted April 22, 2017 Irfan pathan batted like a specialist batsman against Australia in a Test match with dogged defense. Irfan bowling deteriorated faster and faster as his action was getting worse and worse. Irfan was man of the match in Perth Test. Let us not forget. Pandya is good in scoring quick down the order. Irfan can open, come one down. I remember him thrashing Umar Gul for 5 fours in an over in Pakistan batting at 3.
beetle Posted September 26, 2017 Posted September 26, 2017 (edited) Wrong thread. Edited September 26, 2017 by beetle
Zero_Unit Posted September 26, 2017 Posted September 26, 2017 Irfan was a good player (both bat/ball) when he was in prime form, Yousuf was a what if type of player. Pandays here are on a different hitting level.
beetle Posted September 26, 2017 Posted September 26, 2017 Too early to give a verdict on Pandya bros. I love the way Hardik is doing but it is his first big season. Hope he continues this way. Krunal is just a hype right now till he is selected and shows
Vijy Posted October 1, 2017 Posted October 1, 2017 At their best, the Pathan bros were better I think. However, right now, it's obv. the Pandyas.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now