Full Members Received No Revenue Boost From Vote

[Iconoclast]

[Iconoclast]

Some misinformation being spread here that they voted to line their own pockets.

 

As you can see the money goes to the associates.

[Zap_Brannigan]

Conveniently forgetting this, 

The official said one main reason behind these three boards changing stance was the ICC's decision to provide them financial help. It is understood ZC could be given $19 million to clear its debt while the WICB had asked for $40 million as a grant.

 

Do you really think that tv companies pay pak,SL,WI,NZ matches 132 million?they were already stealing and now they just stopped India getting a bigger portion of what is essentially BCCI money anyway. 

[LordPrabhzy]

1 minute ago, Prince_ said:

Add extra 100m to that total of 293 and it will bring india's total share close to 400 m which I personally believe is a bit too high for a nation which already has a well developed cricket infrastructure.

 

Yes, in order to maintain those infrastructure bcci indeed needs some money. I think 250 m would've been more than enough for bcci. 

 

 

Instead if giving India Extra 100 m  Icc should've given that extra amount to other associate nations since they r the one who actually needs help from ICC to, not India/bcci who earns billions of dollars through ipl or other events. ICC's share is like a pocket change to bcci. This is the only way cricket can become a global sport. 

Why is it the Associates should be funded from the money generated by INDIA? is it their moral obligation? 

 

Maybe the chewtiyas at ICC can reduce their $100 million admin expenses and not flying first class and give that money to the associates. Its like FIFA asking to reduce money from Spain, Germany and Brazil's funding to give to India because being a superpower in football they have the duty to promote the sport in smaller countries? 

[PBN]

can we have the revenue shares under the Big 3 model?

[Vilander]

53 minutes ago, Prince_ said:

Add extra 100m to that total of 293 and it will bring india's total share close to 400 m which I personally believe is a bit too high for a nation which already has a well developed cricket infrastructure.

 

Yes, in order to maintain those infrastructure bcci indeed needs some money. I think 250 m would've been more than enough for bcci. 

 

 

Instead if giving India Extra 100 m  Icc should've given that extra amount to other associate nations since they r the one who actually needs help from ICC,  not India/bcci who earns billions of dollars through ipl or other events. ICC's share is like a pocket change to bcci. This is the only way cricket can become a global sport. 

who the heck care what you or your country personally believes. And where did you pull to the 250mil figure from >

[Ultimate_Game]

1 hour ago, Iconoclast said:

Some misinformation being spread here that they voted to line their own pockets.

 

As you can see the money goes to the associates.

Whether anyone lines its pocket is material. What matters is that only BCCI/India's share was cut by 50% while everyone's share remained the same. This is the highway robbery everyone is referring to and if you can't see it or figure it out then can't really do much about it.

 

[Iconoclast]

6 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said:

Whether anyone lines its pocket is material. What matters is that only BCCI/India's share was cut by 50% while everyone's share remained the same. This is the highway robbery everyone is referring to and if you can't see it or figure it out then can't really do much about it.

 

400 million was offered to India while the BCCI was willing to compromise for 450.

 

Note that total BCCI revenue is about 1.5 Billion.

 

The 50 million difference is hence 3% of their total revenue.

 

The extreme overreactions here over this amount are funny.

[Iconoclast]

^^^^ Note the 400M offer is still on the table despite the vote.

[horizonspeaks]

What about the schedule? What's about the freedom of expansion of IPL? Those are also gone with the new league- isn't it?

[Vilander]

46 minutes ago, Iconoclast said:

400 million was offered to India while the BCCI was willing to compromise for 450.

 

Note that total BCCI revenue is about 1.5 Billion.

 

The 50 million difference is hence 3% of their total revenue.

 

The extreme overreactions here over this amount are funny.

who the heck are you to have a say on that, lol India pulls 80% of the revenue and take 20% of the profits and you have the nerve to come here and preach us lol.

[CG]

^^^^ Note the 400M offer is still on the table despite the vote.

It's just patriotism speaking.Funds are never a problem for BCCI.Bcci will agree to 400 million and get CT squad.

[Iconoclast]

1 hour ago, Vilander said:

who the heck are you to have a say on that, lol India pulls 80% of the revenue and take 20% of the profits and you have the nerve to come here and preach us lol.

Source for 80% revenue ?

 

India's GDP is approx $2 trillion.

 

GB $3 trillion, AUS 1.5 trillion, Pak + RSA + NZ + BD  + WI  + another 1 trillion plus, add in associates like the Gulf nations and that figure balloons.

 

 

[vayuu1]

Source for 80% revenue ?

 

India's GDP is approx $2 trillion.

 

GB $3 trillion, AUS 1.5 trillion, Pak + RSA + NZ + BD  + WI  + another 1 trillion plus, add in associates like the Gulf nations and that figure balloons.

 

 

Baklol, Britain's GDP (2.7 trillion, growth rate 2%),India GDP (2.4 trillion, growth rate 7.5%) plus the population of India is 1.25 billion.

 

Sent from my vivo 1601 using Tapatalk

 

 

[BeautifulGame]

1 minute ago, vayuu1 said:

Baklol, Britain's GDP (2.7 trillion, growth rate 2%),India GDP (2.4 trillion, growth rate 7.5%) plus the population of India is 1.25 billion.

 

Sent from my vivo 1601 using Tapatalk

 

 

India's GDP has crossed Britain last month.We r officially the 5 th biggest economy in world.

[beetle]

4 hours ago, Prince_ said:

Manohar will be remembered as a hero by all the newly emerged cricket nations. 

People will spit on him in India.

 

[kubrickian]

1 hour ago, Iconoclast said:

Source for 80% revenue ?

 

India's GDP is approx $2 trillion.

 

GB $3 trillion, AUS 1.5 trillion, Pak + RSA + NZ + BD  + WI  + another 1 trillion plus, add in associates like the Gulf nations and that figure balloons.

 

 

This is the kind of comedy that you can expect only Pakistanis to come up with.  

 

Do you realize size of the economy has no relation to how much money a sport could generate in revenue ? That's just elementary logic. That's like saying if America has a cricket team, they will generate highest revenue just because they are the biggest economy. Dumb stuff.

 

Revenues from countries like Pakistan, SL, WI, SA, NZ, Zimbabwe, Bangladesh combined is still not even 10 % compared to revenue from India and yet they are getting more than 1 billion dollars which is 65 % in revenue and India generates more than 80 % and gets 18 % revenue according to new model. Even 400 million dollars is 25 % which is still a massive loot of BCCI revenue.

 

 

[chewy]

1 hour ago, Iconoclast said:

Source for 80% revenue ?

 

India's GDP is approx $2 trillion.

 

GB $3 trillion, AUS 1.5 trillion, Pak + RSA + NZ + BD  + WI  + another 1 trillion plus, add in associates like the Gulf nations and that figure balloons.

 

 

Lol  

[beetle]

The revenue of one member was cut to half while anothers was untouched.

Basically they took half of bcci share to buy other members to make bcci   

weak.

That should not be a problem for bcci and Indian cricket at all....no?????

[Cricketics]

Why just BCCI's share go to associate nations? Everyone needs to chip in from their share to get associate nations some money, why just BCCI's.

 

This is like raising awareness about poverty and asking for donations from just one person.