Jump to content

Is fielding the only thing that separates these 2 teams?


maniac

Recommended Posts

Posted

I personally think it is fielding followed by batting but based on the reactions to the first test people seem to think that there is not much of a difference between the 2 teams in batting and bowling.

 

So do you think it is fielding that is the difference? Or

 

there is not much to separate the sides? or

 

you think they are better in all 3 departments?

 

Or 

 

a specific department apart from fielding we are lagging behind on like keeper-bat,allrounder etc etc.

Posted
49 minutes ago, maniac said:

I personally think it is fielding followed by batting but based on the reactions to the first test people seem to think that there is not much of a difference between the 2 teams in batting and bowling.

 

So do you think it is fielding that is the difference? Or

 

there is not much to separate the sides? or

 

you think they are better in all 3 departments?

 

Or 

 

a specific department apart from fielding we are lagging behind on like keeper-bat,allrounder etc etc.

Better batsmen , equal on the bowling front 

Posted

Huge gulf in class in this department. We dropped 7 catches, doubt SA will drop that many in these 2 tests combined. Also they are like panthers out there, throwing their body all around. Sridhar ko sharam nahi aati kya?

Posted

Man to man we are better imo , their bowling is slightly better for these conditions ...but I just don't rate their batting here , the pitch in this match allowed them to get to a respectable total . If we get a similar pitch like first test , I can see us bowling them out for 2 sub 150 totals .

Posted
Man to man we are better imo , their bowling is slightly better for these conditions ...but I just don't rate their batting here , the pitch in this match allowed them to get to a respectable total . If we get a similar pitch like first test , I can see us bowling them out for 2 sub 150 totals .
Agreed if we took our catches first test we could have won.We made some mind boggling tactical errors.
Posted

Looks like OP is right, don't see how they are better than us with bat or ball. OTOH they have taken stunners and dropped none. We have given them 9 extra lives already with possibly more to come. They also saved many runs on the field, we had too many misfields. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Sachinism said:

Been a major factor, along with discipline. Too much loose cricket from Indians, bowlers not being able to stitch together a bunch of good deliveries.

All boils down to catching. Dropped catches shatter the confidence of bowlers and make them lose their rhythm. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

India had better resources than SA in this series, it's just that team hasn't been able to utilise it.

how India had better resources?

Posted
14 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

how India had better resources?

Which SA batsman was in form?

 

Last year Elgar scored 3 centuries except that everyone struggled to get runs before Zim and Bangladesh series. 

 

 

Posted
Been a major factor, along with discipline. Too much loose cricket from Indians, bowlers not being able to stitch together a bunch of good deliveries.
Bowling has been Pretty good.No centuries from any Sa batsman.With out any practice they struggle in the first innings of the first test but after that they have been very good only if our Catching was good.
Posted

Would have been a different series with Rahul and rahane in the first test and now rahane in this match. Also would have been different if we selected a better keeper than pappu.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...