rkt.india Posted July 9, 2018 Share Posted July 9, 2018 2 minutes ago, Austin 3:!6 said: Ok I will be honest, our fast bowling bench strength is very poor. If likes of Bhuvi, Bumrah or Shami gets injured, there are no suitable replacements. Thaur, Unadkat, Chahar, Kaul, Siraj etc are absolute rubbish and oozes mediocrity. If any batsman gets injured, there are 10 readily available to replace them but cant say the same for (fast) bowlers. @rkt.india - What is happening man? No good bowlers in domestic? Kaul bowled well yesterday. Even Chahar was not bad. On a 230 pitch, they conceded 198. How was that bad? Look at England pacers. Link to comment
Laaloo Posted July 9, 2018 Share Posted July 9, 2018 13 minutes ago, Austin 3:!6 said: Ok I will be honest, our fast bowling bench strength is very poor. If likes of Bhuvi, Bumrah or Shami gets injured, there are no suitable replacements. Thaur, Unadkat, Chahar, Kaul, Siraj etc are absolute rubbish and oozes mediocrity. If any batsman gets injured, there are 10 readily available to replace them but cant say the same for (fast) bowlers. @rkt.india - What is happening man? No good bowlers in domestic? Csk trundlers getting favoritisim again. Nothing new. Sad days for Indian cricket. asterix, Sandeep99, raki05 and 2 others 1 3 1 Link to comment
Sandeep99 Posted July 9, 2018 Share Posted July 9, 2018 9 minutes ago, rkt.india said: Kaul bowled well yesterday. Even Chahar was not bad. On a 230 pitch, they conceded 198. How was that bad? Look at England pacers. It's not about conceding runs bhai... the fast bowlers have not shown any fight or skills. We had to depend on our 5th bowler Pandya to bail us out of the situation. The fast bowlers were hit with certainty. You knew Chahar would go for runs when he was running in. Mediocre team... so many resources and no pacers to show it for raki05 and Austin 3:!6 2 Link to comment
Austin 3:!6 Posted July 9, 2018 Share Posted July 9, 2018 10 minutes ago, rkt.india said: Kaul bowled well yesterday. Even Chahar was not bad. On a 230 pitch, they conceded 198. How was that bad? Look at England pacers. Yeah but they didn't look quality. Lambi race ka ghora nehi lag raha hai koi bhi. We got some lucky wickets in the end thanks to Pandya and hence Eng couldn't score 200+. Not a single fast bowler has that 'wow' factor. Link to comment
Laaloo Posted July 9, 2018 Share Posted July 9, 2018 (edited) On 7/7/2018 at 12:50 PM, Pollack said: CSK ... Dhoni.....Trundler love.... What has even Raina done to make a comeback? Rayudu gets an Indian ODI team call just based on an awesome IPL while Pant who has been even more awesome in IPL struggles to get into even T20 squad. Deepak Chahar jumps ahead of Rajput and others who have been on selector's radar for sometime and magically finds a place in Indian team.Something is suspicious. Is dhoni pulling the strings even in selections? Spot on. Sad to see dhoni sycopanths still defending this blatant nepotism. Edited July 9, 2018 by Laaloo raki05 1 Link to comment
Austin 3:!6 Posted July 9, 2018 Share Posted July 9, 2018 How about getting Varun Aaron back? He was doing well in counties. Atleast he is Phaaast raki05 1 Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted July 9, 2018 Author Share Posted July 9, 2018 19 minutes ago, Austin 3:!6 said: Ok I will be honest, our fast bowling bench strength is very poor. If likes of Bhuvi, Bumrah or Shami gets injured, there are no suitable replacements. Thaur, Unadkat, Chahar, Kaul, Siraj etc are absolute rubbish and oozes mediocrity. If any batsman gets injured, there are 10 readily available to replace them but cant say the same for (fast) bowlers. @rkt.india - What is happening man? No good bowlers in domestic? how have u declared Siraj rubbish in 2 - t20 games, t20 is not an easy format Look at the pitch kaul n chahar bowled on , atleast wait a few matches to declare anyone case rubbish Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted July 9, 2018 Author Share Posted July 9, 2018 4 minutes ago, Austin 3:!6 said: Yeah but they didn't look quality. Lambi race ka ghora nehi lag raha hai koi bhi. We got some lucky wickets in the end thanks to Pandya and hence Eng couldn't score 200+. Not a single fast bowler has that 'wow' factor. Siraj lambi race ka ghoda hai , usse tumne rubbish declare kr diya thampi ki IPL me dhunayi waha usse janta ne runmachine declare kr diya Rajpoot beemar ho gaya Nagarkotti injured Link to comment
coffee_rules Posted July 9, 2018 Share Posted July 9, 2018 Our ODI fast bowling looks horrible without Bumrah. raki05 and express bowling 2 Link to comment
Austin 3:!6 Posted July 9, 2018 Share Posted July 9, 2018 1 minute ago, Laaloo said: Spot on. Sad to see dhoni sycopanths still defending this blatant nepotism. Suggest us some names...I mean good domestic bowlers, CSK or any franchise...I couldn't care less. Else calling it a nepotism is not on. There is definite nepotism in Indian team when it comes to batting but not in bowling. There are no good bowlers or genuine talents....simple. Selectors tried everyone - Thakur, Unadkat, Chahar, Siraj....everyone. All looks million dollar in IPL but khisiyani billi in internationals. Laaloo and raki05 1 1 Link to comment
Austin 3:!6 Posted July 9, 2018 Share Posted July 9, 2018 6 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: how have u declared Siraj rubbish in 2 - t20 games, t20 is not an easy format Look at the pitch kaul n chahar bowled on , atleast wait a few matches to declare anyone case rubbish Ok lets see what they do in ODIs. Link to comment
rkt.india Posted July 9, 2018 Share Posted July 9, 2018 11 minutes ago, Sandeep99 said: It's not about conceding runs bhai... the fast bowlers have not shown any fight or skills. We had to depend on our 5th bowler Pandya to bail us out of the situation. The fast bowlers were hit with certainty. You knew Chahar would go for runs when he was running in. Mediocre team... so many resources and no pacers to show it for Arey bhai those were making their debuts. Pandya is now playing international cricket for 3 years. Link to comment
Sandeep99 Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 18 hours ago, rkt.india said: Arey bhai those were making their debuts. Pandya is now playing international cricket for 3 years. Bhai I'm saying it doesn't matter whether Chahar/Mohit Sharma is making his debut or playing the 100th match, they will still be hit with certainty. The CSK quota is killing Indian cricket time and again. Piss poor selections and oldies who want to play inconsequential T20 matches just to not allow other youngsters and competitors to play and make a name. raki05 1 Link to comment
express bowling Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 (edited) 20 hours ago, rkt.india said: Kaul bowled well yesterday. Even Chahar was not bad. They may bowl well in a few games or even for a season. But this whole bunch of Unadkat, Thakur, Kaul ( the guys who are getting selected these days ) ooze mediocrity. They are not international class and are unlikely to succeed in the long run. Only 3 types of pacers have gone on to become top international pacers. 1) Genuine fast bowlers who are skilled too. 2) Tall, hit the deck bounce bowlers who are very accurate. 3) Highly skilled genuine swing bowlers who can hit the deck hard when needed. Only Deepak Chahar may qualify in the 3rd category ... that too only if he learns to hit the deck hard with consistency when needed. We need to bring in or groom Saini 1 Rajpoot 2 and 3 Khaleel 1 and 2 Avesh 1 and 2 Prasidh 2 and 3 Mavi 1 and 3 Nagarkoti 1 Siraj can qualify only if he can bowl at genuine pace as he is neither a bounce bowler nor a swing bowler. The pace bowling attack as a whole should preferably have representatives of all 3 categories ... with 2 genuine fast bowlers if possible. We are not looking at this aspect too these days. Edited July 10, 2018 by express bowling putrevus, Lannister, GolGappe and 5 others 1 4 3 Link to comment
Lannister Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 (edited) He is even more useless than this Chahar guy. It seems all it takes is a CSK contract to get into the Indian team. Sad state of affairs. Edited July 10, 2018 by Lannister UrmiSinhaRay, Suhaan and Pollack 1 1 1 Link to comment
Suhaan Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 Csk quota is there but even if it isnt this Thakur reminds me of Mohit sharma,we have been trying same kind of bowlers over and over again despite their ultra mediocrity express bowling, Lannister, UrmiSinhaRay and 5 others 3 5 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 56 minutes ago, Lannister said: He is even more useless than this Chahar guy. It seems all it takes is a CSK contract to get into the Indian team. Sad state of affairs. but Thakur made his ODI debut last year. he was not playing for CSK then. Link to comment
Lannister Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 11 minutes ago, rkt.india said: but Thakur made his ODI debut last year. he was not playing for CSK then. He should've been dropped. A close ties with Dhoni has just extended his stay. UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 25 minutes ago, Lannister said: He should've been dropped. A close ties with Dhoni has just extended his stay. i dont think he has any close ties with Dhoni because even Dhoni had dropped him from CSK XI. Link to comment
Suhaan Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 (edited) Lets see how he fares in this series,anyway a severe clubbing will be in best interest of Indian cricket Edited July 10, 2018 by Suhaan Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now