Jump to content

India currently has best bowling line up in world


Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Clarke said:

The question marks continue .. selection is one issue but performances can be questionable as well.

 

I would back Steyn-Rabada-Ndigi-Philander to bowl Aus out here in a day.

Surely, a bowling unit is allowed to have an off day once in a while. I rate Steyn and Rabad, but the other 2 are ok ok. But I think its too early to judge Indian bowling based on one inning. 

Also, it seems to me that the whole Indian team, including the coach has made a mistake reading the pitch. 

Link to comment

Another successful year for bowlers proving their worth despite playing most games away from home

Overall figures
Team Players Mat Inns Overs Mdns Runs Wkts BBI BBM AveAscending Econ SR 5 10  
South Africa 17 10 101 1402.1 315 4285 186 9/129 12/283 23.03 3.05 45.2 10 3 investigate this query
India 24 14 134 2130.2 418 6220 257 6/33 10/133 24.20 2.91 49.7 9 1 investigate this query
Pakistan 21 9 90 1402.4 330 3766 155 8/41 14/184 24.29 2.68 54.2 9 2 investigate this query
West Indies 16 9 86 1111.2 175 3691 143 8/62 13/121 25.81 3.32 46.6 8 2 investigate this query
Bangladesh 26 8 79 1200.3 215 3625 136 7/58 12/117 26.65 3.01 52.9 10 2 investigate this query
New Zealand 14 7 64 1202.5 292 3170 113 6/30 9/99 28.05 2.63 63.8 5 0 investigate this query
England 24 13 134 2017.4 387 6143 213 6/54 9/43 28.84 3.04 56.8 5 0 investigate this query
Sri Lanka 21 12 115 1867.2 289 6046 197 6/32 10/78 30.69 3.23 56.8 9 1 investigate this query
Zimbabwe 12 2 24 328.1 57 1020 32 5/71 7/98 31.87 3.10 61.5 1 0 investigate this query
Australia 21 10 107 1925.3 392 5628 172 6/27 9/99 32.72 2.92 67.1 5 0 investigate this query
Ireland 11 1 10 141.0 24 459 13 4/45 6/100 35.30 3.25 65.0 0 0 investigate this query
Afghanistan 11 1 6 104.5 15 461 9 3/51 3/51 51.22 4.39 69.8 0 0

 

 

Numbers for 2017 - shows how much team has improved this year

Overall figures
Team Players Mat Inns Overs Mdns Runs Wkts BBI BBM AveAscending Econ SR 5 10  
South Africa 20 12 110 1542.3 330 4953 215 6/40 10/63 23.03 3.21 43.0 7 2 investigate this query
India 19 11 105 1859.4 405 5318 200 6/41 9/178 26.59 2.85 55.7 5 0 investigate this query
Australia 19 11 97 1809.2 376 5079 185 8/50 13/154 27.45 2.80 58.6 10 2 investigate this query
New Zealand 16 7 66 1105.0 249 3406 116 7/39 9/141 29.36 3.08 57.1 2 0 investigate this query
Pakistan 18 6 61 1134.2 230 3279 109 7/94 9/177 30.08 2.89 62.4 7 0 investigate this query
England 20 11 122 1856.5 434 5520 179 7/42 10/112 30.83 2.97 62.2 8 1 investigate this query
West Indies 17 10 97 1690.1 340 5157 148 5/11 9/92 34.84 3.05 68.5 3 0 investigate this query
Zimbabwe 18 4 36 683.0 107 2033 52 5/99 9/275 39.09 2.97 78.8 2 0 investigate this query
Sri Lanka 23 13 121 2205.4 292 7693 188 6/43 11/136 40.92 3.48 70.3 9 2 investigate this query
Bangladesh 21 9 102 1522.2 182 5592 110 5/68 10/153 50.83 3.67 83.0 2 1

 

 

Last 3 years

Overall figures
Team Players Span Mat Inns Overs Mdns Runs Wkts BBI BBM AveAscending Econ SR 5 10  
South Africa 27 2016-2018 31 294 4108.0 892 13003 534 9/129 13/144 24.35 3.16 46.1 25 6 investigate this query
India 29 2016-2018 37 352 5991.1 1237 17164 660 7/48 13/140 26.00 2.86 54.4 26 5 investigate this query
Australia 34 2016-2018 32 312 5543.3 1138 16580 546 8/50 13/154 30.36 2.99 60.9 20 3 investigate this query
New Zealand 26 2016-2018 25 238 4224.5 959 12279 398 7/39 9/99 30.85 2.90 63.6 12 0 investigate this query
Pakistan 32 2016-2018 26 256 4412.0 859 13295 429 8/41 14/184 30.99 3.01 61.7 23 4 investigate this query
England 37 2016-2018 41 436 6713.0 1346 20652 655 7/42 11/102 31.52 3.07 61.4 21 3 investigate this query
West Indies 28 2016-2018 27 247 3896.0 672 12443 370 8/49 13/121 33.62 3.19 63.1 16 3 investigate this query
Sri Lanka 30 2016-2018 34 327 5467.2 829 18060 535 8/63 13/145 33.75 3.30 61.3 25 6 investigate this query
Ireland 11 2018-2018 1 10 141.0 24 459 13 4/45 6/100 35.30 3.25 65.0 0 0 investigate this query
Bangladesh 31 2016-2018 19 205 3036.0 448 10098 285 7/58 12/117 35.43 3.32 63.9 16 4 investigate this query
Zimbabwe 27 2016-2018 10 108 1807.1 272 5834 130 5/71 9/275 44.87 3.22 83.4 3 0 investigate this query
Afghanistan 11 2018-2018 1 6 104.5 15 461 9 3/51 3/51 51.22 4.39 69.8 0 0

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Trichromatic said:

 

Groom 2 more pacers, preferably a left armer and this will be most diverse attack ever in world cricket.

 

A left arm pacer, for the sake of it, will get us another Khaleel.  (  Although, in Khaleel's case, he did look good just before debut  ).   

 

The best available pacers should be chosen irrespective of whether they are left armers or right armers.

 

Avesh, Rajpoot, Siraj, Mavi, Saini and Aniket C should be next in line. 

 

Aniket C Is the only left armer in there.  And should be added only if he looks better than the others and not because he is a left armer.

 

The great WI attacks of 1976 to 1995   and the great Aussie test match attacks of 1994 to 2006, did not have any left armers.

 

A lot of variety is possible among right armed bowlers too, like we have now.

Edited by express bowling
Link to comment
5 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

A left arm pacer, for the sake of it, will get us another Khaleel.  (  Although, in Khaleel's case, he did look good just before debut  ).   

 

The best available pacers should be chosen irrespective of whether they are left armers or right armers.

 

Avesh, Rajpoot, Siraj, Mavi, Saini and Aniket C should be next in line. 

 

Aniket C Is the only left armer in there.  And should be added only if he looks better than the others and not because he is a left armer.

 

The great WI attacks of 1976 to 1995   and the great Aussie test match attacks of 1994 to 2006, did not have any left armers.

 

A lot off variety is possible among right armed bowlers too, like we have now.

Lol i know those guys deserve it but come on saying same thing everywhere that Avesh, Rajpoot or Siraj should get chance quickly doesn't make sense. Currently bowlers are doing well so why drop them and you keep posting same stuff again and again.

Link to comment

Series nearing end, India definitely best bowling attack in the world. Consistently taking 20 wickets.

 

This series began with Australia's bowling being touted as the best, but now two tests in a row they have struggled to take 20 wickets.

 

Head on, India bowling unit has outperformed Australia bowling on all factors. 

 

Right now top bowling attacks (all conditions), strongest to weakest:

1) India

2) Australia

3) South Africa

4) England

5) New Zealand

6) Pakistan

7) West Indies

8) Bangladesh

9) Sri Lanka

Link to comment
6 hours ago, Nikola said:

Lol i know those guys deserve it but come on saying same thing everywhere that Avesh, Rajpoot or Siraj should get chance quickly doesn't make sense. Currently bowlers are doing well so why drop them and you keep posting same stuff again and again.

 

1.   This post is in reply to this statement below 

 "  Groom 2 more pacers, preferably a left armer and this will be most diverse attack ever in world cricket. "

So, basically a discussion about grooming new pacers which I did not start.

 

 

2.   I am not advocating dropping the current lot of pacers.  Bumrah, Shami and Ishant are forming a potent combination outside Asia now.  These names above are just proper backup options.

 

I said that they should be next in line, which you did not read properly.

 

 

3.  But the main thing to remember is ...  pacers are more injury prone than other types of cricketers.   Hence,  backups have to be kept ready.

a)  Just look at this current test match.  Ishant got injured and we did not have a proper pace backup. We were lucky that this venue is spin friendly and we won the toss.

b)  When Bumrah got injured in the first 2 tests in England, our pace attack looked much weaker.  We did not have any backups ready either.

 

 

4.  Test matches against weaker nations,  like WI and Zimbabwe, should be used / should have been used to groom new quicks.  

 

Again,  this step is not for replacing the current quicks immediately but for creating adequate backups if needed.

 

 

5.  Since our pace attack is doing well these days, a lot of new threads are opening on pace bowlers and pace bowling.  And they are discussing new pacers ... whereby these names are coming up multiple times. Multiple threads on similar subjects means similar discussion multiple times. This is how forums work.

 

 

 

6.   If you don't like my posts, don't read them.  I rarely quote your posts these days.  

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by express bowling
Link to comment
59 minutes ago, Nikola said:

Lol i know those guys deserve it but come on saying same thing everywhere that Avesh, Rajpoot or Siraj should get chance quickly doesn't make sense. Currently bowlers are doing well so why drop them and you keep posting same stuff again and again.

Why drop them. We play lot of matches. Room for all.

Link to comment
2 hours ago, express bowling said:

 

A left arm pacer, for the sake of it, will get us another Khaleel.  (  Although, in Khaleel's case, he did look good just before debut  ).   

 

The best available pacers should be chosen irrespective of whether they are left armers or right armers.

 

Avesh, Rajpoot, Siraj, Mavi, Saini and Aniket C should be next in line. 

 

Aniket C Is the only left armer in there.  And should be added only if he looks better than the others and not because he is a left armer.

 

The great WI attacks of 1976 to 1995   and the great Aussie test match attacks of 1994 to 2006, did not have any left armers.

 

A lot of variety is possible among right armed bowlers too, like we have now.

Yup, only Bernard Julien and Gary Sobers were the left arm bowlers in WI during that phase. The original pace quartet and the one after Croft was replaced by Marshall had no lefties.

Edited by Straight Drive
Link to comment
3 hours ago, Vilander said:

to whom? you? if you don't like it don't read it. 

He is posting same stuff in almost every post i see of his from last 3 months. I get the point that those bowlers deserves chance to play but then we got test matches almost year later now.

Link to comment
5 hours ago, express bowling said:

 

A left arm pacer, for the sake of it, will get us another Khaleel.  (  Although, in Khaleel's case, he did look good just before debut  ).   

 

The best available pacers should be chosen irrespective of whether they are left armers or right armers.

 

Avesh, Rajpoot, Siraj, Mavi, Saini and Aniket C should be next in line. 

 

Aniket C Is the only left armer in there.  And should be added only if he looks better than the others and not because he is a left armer.

 

The great WI attacks of 1976 to 1995   and the great Aussie test match attacks of 1994 to 2006, did not have any left armers.

 

A lot of variety is possible among right armed bowlers too, like we have now.

Left arm Pacers are overrated in tests. They lose effectiveness when they can't get ball to swing in for left armers

Link to comment
3 hours ago, Straight Drive said:

Yup, only Bernard Julien and Gary Sobers were the left arm bowlers in WI during that phase. The original pace quartet and the one after Croft was replaced by Marshall had no lefties.

 

Yes.  And Sobers retired in 1974  and Julien never played after early 1977.   During their 1976 to 1995 quick bowling heydays, they hardly played any left armers.

Edited by express bowling
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...