Jump to content

Pujara is just doing enough to save his place but thats not enough for team. Why is he getting away among all


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

As m saying our concern is overseas, we cnt ignore pujara numbers coz then we are not going to win 

Subcontinet can balance numbers of dhawan n lets not forget he was gr8 in NZ 2014 tour where pujara avg 15 

 

Playing 5 batsman among which one avg around 30 overseas will not help, his inconsistencies also needs to be looked into it

M not up for dropping him right now, But team mngmt shud tell him we are expecting more out of u and if aussie tour doesnt go well ( which i have feeling he wnt do well ) then some serious thinking shud be done regd him

Let's wait and watch .... he has shown inclination to turn it around 

Link to comment
12 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Kohli made runs everywhere aprt from eng in his 1st cycle, infact he was a beast. 

Pujara was below avg then and still is avg 

 

till when are we going to be happy with avg, not so bad

 

Rahane in all sena countries has had only one bad tour actually which was this one. Pujara i think only has one good n one avg ......Lets not go to subcontinet ....no one is questioning him their

 

IMO he has turned nothing around , it was still 1-2 innings in 8 chances.....m ok if a young player does that but not a senior one

Turn around is what kohli did this time

this . Kohli deserved his chances  to play in this ENG series because he has been   so brilliant in all  of SENA except ENG . Similar was the case with Rahane too, but unlike Kohli he couldn't turn it around this time , for which he can be  exempted because to be brilliant in all alien countries is an exception  rather than a norm.

Pujara still remains mediocre in all of SENA + WI . Time to move on from him much intensely than the case is with Rahane

Link to comment
Just now, rtmohanlal said:

this . Kohli deserved his chances  to play in this ENG series because he has been   so brilliant in all  of SENA except ENG . Similar was the case with Rahane too, but unlike Kohli he couldn't turn it around this time , for which he can be  exempted because to be brilliant in all alien countries is an exception  rather than a norm.

Pujara still remains mediocre in all of SENA + WI . Time to move on from him much intensely than the case is with Rahane

A weak argument as Ind is currently #1 because of its performance in subcon, where Pujara wins you test series :winky:

 

Link to comment
10 minutes ago, zen said:

Irrelevant as both were chosen based on their records, whatever they are, to play in Eng .... Pujara displayed an upward trend, while Rahane, who is supposed to take up the baton in SENA, got exposed

 

Also Pujara wins you more tests with his batting in most conditions :winky:  

For me this is the most important fact : Pujara still remains mediocre in all of SENA + WI  despite several series in these countries and that says a lot about his general calibre to master those  alien conditions. Infact it has been 8 series  till date to these 5 alien countries  combined and he remains absolutely mediocre in all of these 5 countries!!!!!!!!!!! You believe in what ever you feel of him , but  sorry,  for me this track record  is faaaar from adequate. On the other hand, Rahane has been so brilliant in 4 out  of these 5 countries till date.

And to me, Rahane  convinces me far more in future series in these alien countries than Pujara.

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, rtmohanlal said:

For me this is the most important fact : Pujara still remains mediocre in all of SENA + WI  despite several series in these countries and that says a lot about his general calibre to master those  alien conditions. Infact it has been 8 series  till date to these 5 alien countries  combined and he remains absolutely mediocre in all of these 5 countries!!!!!!!!!!! You believe in what ever you feel of him , but  sorry,  for me this track record  is faaaar from adequate. On the other hand, Rahane has been so brilliant in 4 out  of these 5 countries till date.

And to me, Rahane  convinces me far more in future series in these alien countries than Pujara.

You don't pick players based on what they did 4-5 years ago .... In last 2 years, Rahane has struggled. In Eng, he got exposed .... End of story .... Pujara is atm a better option considering subcon + SENA 

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, zen said:

You don't pick players based on what they did 4-5 years ago .... In last 2 years, Rahane has struggled. In Eng, he got exposed .... End of story .... Pujara is atm a better option considering subcon + SENA 

ok ... you stick with your logic .... because I am not at all interested in  arguing to prove a point or some thing like that. And I shall stick on with my  justifications  for  placing Rahane  far higher than Pujara... no problems

Link to comment
18 minutes ago, rtmohanlal said:

ok ... you stick with your logic .... because I am not at all interested in  arguing to prove a point or some thing like that. And I shall stick on with my  justifications  for  placing Rahane  far higher than Pujara... no problems

Rahane can be considered if he shows good form. Right now, I would want to try out a youngster :dance:

Link to comment

Of all our problems pujara is the least. He can at least block 50 balls on average to protect middle order.

 

Rahane comes in much better position and struggles . He is supposed to marshall the tail and gets out before he gets to that position. 

 

Pujara is on notice but we need to go in a phased manner. Get rahane and dhawan out and get shaw/mayank and nair into the team.

 

Nair deserves chances ahead of gill and vihari to be honest . I think we need to provide hope to ranji performers else everyone will look at ipl as way to get into test team.

 

Pandya, rahane should go and play ranji and if they perform there they should get selected on A tours . I think this will make everyone strive more for consistency. 

 

Now there is a huge chaltha hai attitude .

 

Link to comment

No one except Kohli was perfect. But Pujara, Ishant and Ashwin also kind of showed importance of exposure in conditions before going there to play. Even with wretched county season pujara knew what was coming and he played according and was not horrible. 

 

Imagine if Rahul, Vijay and Rahane has some experience of those conditions we could have had better showing from these guys. 

Link to comment
25 minutes ago, CoverDrive said:

No one except Kohli was perfect. But Pujara, Ishant and Ashwin also kind of showed importance of exposure in conditions before going there to play. Even with wretched county season pujara knew what was coming and he played according and was not horrible. 

 

Imagine if Rahul, Vijay and Rahane has some experience of those conditions we could have had better showing from these guys. 

Not sure, but I think Rahul has not even played club ckt before in Eng... Thats idiotic

Link to comment

We need to give Mayank Agrawal and Lokesh Rahul a go as openers ..I think Dhawan & Vijay are out of red-ball cricket .

 

Rahane & Pandya also need to be dropped with specific feedback on whaT THEY NEED TO IMPROVE UPON.lET THEM MAKE ENOUGH RUNS IN DOMESTICS TO FORCE THEIR WAY BACK IN SIDE. Pandya needs to score some big hundreds  beforec  deserving a no.6 position in batting .

Link to comment

If we have to rely on Rahane 4-5 years old stats to show that he is good, ironically, it would only show that he is a regressed player who needs to work on his game to be reconsidered for a spot :lol:

 

View overall figures [change view]
Primary team India remove India from query
Opposition team Australia remove Australia from query or England remove England from query or New Zealand remove New Zealand from query or South Africa remove South Africa from query
Home or away away (home of opposition) remove away (home of opposition) from query
Start of match date between 14 Sep 2016 and 14 Sep 2018 remove between 14 Sep 2016 and 14 Sep 2018 from query
Ordered by runs scored (descending)
Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 21 of 21   First pageFirst Previous pagePrevious Next Next page Last Last page dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Overall figures
Player Mat Inns NO RunsDescending HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
V Kohli 8 16 0 879 153 54.93 1500 58.60 3 4 1 102 1 investigate this query
CA Pujara 7 14 1 378 132* 29.07 1068 35.39 1 2 2 48 0 investigate this query
KL Rahul 7 14 0 329 149 23.50 551 59.70 1 0 2 48 1 investigate this query
AM Rahane 6 12 0 314 81 26.16 734 42.77 0 2 1 34 0 investigate this query
HH Pandya 7 14 1 283 93 21.76 461 61.38 0 2 2 42 2 investigate this query
R Ashwin 6 12 2 216 38 21.60 321 67.28 0 0 0 33 1 investigate this query
S Dhawan 5 10 0 194 44 19.40 325 59.69 0 0 0 28 0 investigate this query
RR Pant 3 6 0 162 114 27.00 252 64.28 1 0 1 20 6 investigate this query
M Vijay 5 10 0 128 46 12.80 434 29.49 0 0 2 15 0

investigate this query

 

An avg of 26 at #5 or below in SENA for a SENA specialist is a joke! 

 

 

Below against SENA countries at home:

 

View overall figures [change view]
Primary team India remove India from query
Opposition team Australia remove Australia from query or England remove England from query or New Zealand remove New Zealand from query or South Africa remove South Africa from query
Home or away home venue remove home venue from query
Start of match date between 14 Sep 2016 and 14 Sep 2018 remove between 14 Sep 2016 and 14 Sep 2018 from query
Ordered by runs scored (descending)
Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 21 of 21   First pageFirst Previous pagePrevious Next Next page Last Last page dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Overall figures
Player Mat Inns NO RunsDescending HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
CA Pujara 12 21 1 1179 202 58.95 2549 46.25 4 6 1 141 2 investigate this query
V Kohli 11 19 2 1010 235 59.41 1717 58.82 3 2 1 110 1 investigate this query
KL Rahul 8 13 1 696 199 58.00 1175 59.23 1 6 1 85 6 investigate this query
M Vijay 11 19 0 656 136 34.52 1562 41.99 2 3 1 71 9 investigate this query
AM Rahane 10 18 2 608 188 38.00 1263 48.13 1 2 1 66 7

 

At home vs SENA, avg only 38 

 

 

We can conclude that based on his current form, he is not a SENA specialist whether at home or away .... Needs to improve his current game to be reconsidered (and not based on what he did 4-5 years ago)

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...