Jump to content

India Test squad for #AUSvIND -


ssurenn

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, ssurenn said:

Virat Kohli(c), Murali Vijay, KL Rahul, Prithvi Shaw, Pujara, Ajinkya Rahane, Hanuma Vihari, Rohit Sharma, Rishabh Pant, Parthiv Patel, R Ashwin, R Jadeja, Kuldeep Yadav, Shami, Ishant, Umesh, Bumrah, Bhuvneshwar Kumar

why the hell are murli and rohit selected?

Murli was history and rohit has failed big time in tests always..

Posted
57 minutes ago, Tendulkar1996 said:

WTH are siraj and mayank?

How can murali vijay be brought back without giving mayank a chance?

Pandya absence means we will be forced to play 5 bowlers.Siraj would have been good backup.

Rohit sharma is good addition as he can play both middle order and opener and his technique is suited to aus pitches.

rubbish murli ahead of highly talented Mayank...oh RUBBISH

 

ROHIT is a failure in the past and you can see the same in australia too..

Posted
7 hours ago, Nonbeliever said:

If starc, Hazelwood Cummins, Lyon all play, I am sure three careers will end forever..rahane,rohit and Vijay.

You still hope that?? :giggle: Must say you are a strong optimist then... Has happened so many times in past 3 years, but these gems just need to perform in an ODI series or on flat decks in India and they will be back! 

Posted

 

8 hours ago, ssurenn said:

Virat Kohli(c), Murali Vijay, KL Rahul, Prithvi Shaw, Pujara, Ajinkya Rahane, Hanuma Vihari, Rohit Sharma, Rishabh Pant, Parthiv Patel, R Ashwin, R Jadeja, Kuldeep Yadav, Shami, Ishant, Umesh, Bumrah, Bhuvneshwar Kumar

* Where is Mayank? They dropped someone without giving chance again. 

* How did Rohit and Patel made it into the Test team after their horrendous performance in SA? Now we are left with poor backups. 

* No Siraj but three spinners have been selected for Australia tour. Is this some kind of joke?

* Vijay can be a backup option for Pujara, as there's still a question mark over latter's ability to perform in SENA. 

* Finally, no Pandya. I think we can field a proper bowler in place of him without compromising the team balance. This is a blessing in disguise. 

 

Poor selections all over again. When are we getting rid of these jokers from the selection panel?

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Lannister said:

 

* Where is Mayank? They dropped someone without giving chance again. 

* How did Rohit and Patel made it into the Test team after their horrendous performance in SA? Now we are left with poor backups. 

* No Siraj but three spinners have been selected for Australia tour. Is this some kind of joke?

* Vijay can be a backup option for Pujara, as there's still a question mark over latter's ability to perform in SENA. 

* Finally, no Pandya. I think we can field a proper bowler in place of him without compromising the team balance. This is a blessing in disguise. 

 

Poor selections all over again. When are we getting rid of these jokers from the selection panel?

 

We will actually be compromising on team balance if we play a proper bowler in place of Pandya.

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Agree. Those 5 bowlers have won us so many series overseas then why there is a need for any other pacer.

Have you watched any last 2 series ?? It's not bowler who lost but Batters who can't even score 193,209,270. Bowler did pretty well but bastmen who don't do Thier job.

Edited by test fan
Posted
8 hours ago, test fan said:

BC Siraj Siraj again .we have 5 fast bowler already why ppl crying again &again .

LOL If I not for my Indian pride I would have laughed mockingly at the quality of our pace bowlers except Bumrah and to some extent Shami.

Posted

Good to see Vijay in place of Dhawan, easily the better Test player. 

 

Theee complaints -

 

Why Rohit instead of Nair or even Agarwal?

 

Why Pappu? Any other young wicketkeeper Samson, Kishan etc would have been future looking.

 

Siraj should have been drafted in the Test squad, particularly an overseas one with pace and bounce.

Posted
1 hour ago, test fan said:

Have you watched any last 2 series ?? It's not bowler who lost but Batters who can't even score 193,209,270. Bowler did pretty well but bastmen who don't do Thier job.

Those were bowling pitches. Several times they let England of the hook After 6-7 down for nothing. Especially shami who averaged 40 in the series.

Posted
26 minutes ago, Lannister said:

No. Pandya is not a quality Test all-rounder to afford a place with in the team. 

So then we will play with 4 bowlers. Playing 5th bowler weakens the batting.

Posted
17 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

So then we will play with 4 bowlers. Playing 5th bowler weakens the batting.

But India's weakness has always been a bowling and bowlers win Test matches. Since we don't have a good Test all-rounder, the bowling all-rounders like Kumar, Jadeja and Ashwin is all we can afford as of now. 

Posted
They put too much pressure on virat to select  Rohit Sharma.have you seen his fan ranting every where for his inclusion in test squad
Ambani backing.
Also I think it is a secret deal to keep Kohli in captaincy at least till 19WC

Sent from my CPH1609 using Tapatalk

Posted

Pandya is gonna be a big miss ,it's imperative to have that 5th bowler as a filler ,now I think kohli and co will play only 4 bowlers (just like  oval) out of which 1 will be a spinner who'll be useless anyways .

So basically it'll be the 3 pacers who will have to carry out huge workload especially on those pattas in the heat 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...