Jump to content

RCB will still turn it around and atleast reach knockouts


Global.Baba

Recommended Posts

On 4/6/2019 at 1:10 PM, Straight Drive said:

Right from the starting edition of IPL, RCB never had a top class T20 bowler like Narine, Rashid Khan , Andrew Tye, Jasprit Bumrah, Dale Steyn (for few years in SRH), Bhuvi (for few years for SRH) and Malinga. Their other bowlers too have been tonked well over the editions of IPL by the opponents more often than not.

 

RCB have spent 27 crores on two players (ABD and Virat).  The other mismatch buy was Yuvi for about 14 crores. These were not value for money buys. As such they were left with less amount to be paid to get top bowlers. Unless and until they solve or reduce the price paid to AB and Virat, they will be doing poorly at auctions and it will reflect in their performances in future IPL seasons as well just how it is seen in the 12 IPL seasons.

 

 

 

33 Crores deducted from purse for 3 players. Virat, AB and Sarfraz :giggle:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, philcric said:

 

33 Crores deducted from purse for 3 players. Virat, AB and Sarfraz :giggle:

The problem is the 27 crores for two players who are not worth anywhere near that amount.

 

Look at Narine and Russell. 15 core for both who have out performed Kohli and ABD. Gayle to has been giving wonderful performances for most years inspite of earning lesser relatively. Even Rashid Khan is doing wonders for less than 10 crores. Many other examples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Straight Drive said:

The problem is the 27 crores for two players who are not worth anywhere near that amount.

 

Look at Narine and Russell. 15 core for both who have out performed Kohli and ABD. Gayle to has been giving wonderful performances for most years inspite of earning lesser relatively. Even Rashid Khan is doing wonders for less than 10 crores. Many other examples.

 

Narine & Russell ... purse deduction is 21 Crore not 15 Crore, even though they are paid 15 Crore.


 

Quote

 

If a franchisee opts to retain three players pre-auction, it will cost them a total of INR 15, 11 and 7 Crores (INR 33 Crores) respectively for the trio. A retention of only two players would cost them INR 12.5 and 8.5 (INR 21 Crores) respectively. If they opt to retain just the one player, then they'll have to suffer a deduction of INR 12.5 Crores from their auction purse.


 

Retaining 3 players for a total of 33 Crore is fine. CSK and MI did that.

 

RCB's 4 most important players were Virat, AB, Rahul and Chahal (Gayle was out of form and unfit around that time). RCB should have retained Virat, AB and Rahul. And get Chahal on right-to-match (which they did). Why did Virat make RCB pay 17 Cr. which was 2 Cr. more than required by the retention policy? Ego. Just to be the highest paid player in IPL.

 

Virat's earnings have been 100 Crore plus per year for many years now. A few extra crores in IPL is very little in his overall earnings. The smarter thing to do would have been to either stick to retention policies, or even take a little cut from salary if that is what was required to retain Rahul/Chahal. A title win or good showing in IPL or even public perception that Virat would do anything for his team is worth much more (even financially) than those extra couple of crores in salary or the tag of highest paid IPL player.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, philcric said:

 

RCB's 4 most important players were Virat, AB, Rahul and Chahal (Gayle was out of form and unfit around that time). RCB should have retained Virat, AB and Rahul. And get Chahal on right-to-match (which they did). Why did Virat make RCB pay 17 Cr. which was 2 Cr. more than required by the retention policy? Ego. Just to be the highest paid player in IPL.

 

Virat's earnings have been 100 Crore plus per year for many years now. A few extra crores in IPL is very little in his overall earnings. The smarter thing to do would have been to either stick to retention policies, or even take a little cut from salary if that is what was required to retain Rahul/Chahal. A title win or good showing in IPL or even public perception that Virat would do anything for his team is worth much more (even financially) than those extra couple of crores in salary or the tag of highest paid IPL player.

 

This I agree.. If RCB release Kohli next year, he may not get bid for more than 15cr 

Even Kohli's buddy, Nehra too is one of the highest paid coaches. Wonder how RCB mgmt calculates the return on investment

Edited by diga
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, diga said:

This I agree.. If RCB release Kohli next year, he may not get bid for more than 15cr 

Even Kohli's buddy, Nehra too is one of the highest paid coaches. Wonder how RCB mgmt calculates the return on investment

i wonder whats more important for rcb, the money from sponsors (espacially for mr super star captain) or winning?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...