Shahid Afridi: Resuming Indo-Pak cricket is the only way for India or Pak to win more world cups

[rangeelaraja]

Guys did you hear this pea brained creatures comments on game on hai show - he said both India and Pakistan have dominated global cricket only when they played each other and India cannot win a World Cup is it avoids bilateral series against Pakistan. 

 

What a brainless ideology 

[rangeelaraja]

ALso have never undertood such desperate shameless measures, almost begging to play us. Is money the only criteria ?

 

i don’t see how India benefits playing them, they are a very mediocre team .

Edited July 12, 2019 by rangeelaraja

[shami_123]

Only explanation I can give is that heads will roll if we lose to Pak and give way for youngsters.

[IndianRenegade]

3 minutes ago, shami_123 said:

Only explanation I can give is that heads will roll if we lose to Pak and give way for youngsters.

Lolz like it rolled after the wc match? 

[kosingh]

Resuming ind pak cricket is also the only way to counter poverty, unemployment, climate change, violence against women, etc

[shami_123]

3 minutes ago, IndianRenegade said:

Lolz like it rolled after the wc match? 

Losing to Pak is taken to heart much more than losing to anyone anywhere including WC finals, even on this forum.

[kosingh]

1 minute ago, shami_123 said:

Losing to Pak is taken to heart much more than losing to anyone anywhere including WC finals, even on this forum.

Sorry but we don't know what losing to Pak in a WC feels like. 

 

 

[shami_123]

2 minutes ago, kosingh said:

Sorry but we don't know what losing to Pak in a WC feels like. 

 

 

Losing anywhere not just WC per say, losing will lead to head roll, it has happened in the past.

[IndianRenegade]

8 minutes ago, shami_123 said:

Losing to Pak is taken to heart much more than losing to anyone anywhere including WC finals, even on this forum.

1. India has lost to Pakistan as recently as 2017, heads did not roll. 

2. The current Indian team even without changes will comfortably win a bilateral series against Pakistan, even if they lose an odd game.

3. No, we are not giving money that will be used to sponsor terror against us.

Edited July 12, 2019 by IndianRenegade

[beetle]

16 minutes ago, IndianRenegade said:

Lolz like it rolled after the wc match? 

Or the CT final

[IndianRenegade]

4 minutes ago, beetle said:

Or the CT final

Actually, I wasn’t very clear. I was mocking his claim that India will lose to Pakistan like the recent ind-pak WC game.

Edited July 12, 2019 by IndianRenegade

[shami_123]

Hmm... Where was Ashwin and Jadeja until recently in LOI setup ?

[IndianRenegade]

18 minutes ago, shami_123 said:

Hmm... Where was Ashwin and Jadeja until recently in LOI setup ?

That’s heads to rolling for you? The batting order that collapsed more or less remained the same. Ashwin did play after that, but kuldeep is a better bowler than him, jadeja was always on & off. 

[SK_IH]

[Norman]

2011 mein humne konsa bilateral khela tha ? 

 

Ye lola chutiya ka chutiya hi reh gaya . 

[IndianRenegade]

46 minutes ago, Shaz1 said:

What happen to Ashwin? Is he too old that he never made it to your team?

May be ask hasan Ali?

[Dil Dil India]

1 hour ago, IndianRenegade said:

1. India has lost to Pakistan as recently as 2017, heads did not roll. 

2. The current Indian team even without changes will comfortably win a bilateral series against Pakistan, even if they lose an odd game.

3. No, we are not giving money that will be used to sponsor terror against us.

Your first point is not really correct. Kulcha replaced Ashwin/Jaddu since then. Also when we lost the aane do series in 12-13 we finally sacked Sehwag, Gambhir and all the deadwood.

[R!TTER]

Kya peeke aaya hai tharki 

[Dil Dil India]

1 hour ago, Shaz1 said:

Soon beta soon. 

By 2063 you should have a win.

[Khota]

No need for bilaterals.