Jump to content

Difference between Australia and India.. interesting observation


Sgattick10

Recommended Posts

Posted

These foreign journos and writers already know about Shubman Gill and his talent yet out chutiya selectors will keep ignoring him for the likes of Rahane and Dhawan kyunki yaari, dosti and regional quota is more imp then talent. I mean they said Gill will easily find a spot in Australia or any other test side..

Posted
7 minutes ago, Suhaan said:

No point having all the Gangulys and Gambhirs at helm when this TM is always there to raise their middle finger on their face and deliberately ignoring people other than chuddy buddies

ganguly is president he cant n shudnt interfere in team matters

Gambhir will be in CAC whose role wud be to select coach n selectors

 

If u really want these guys in decision making then put them in right job like Team director 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Sgattick10 said:

https://youtu.be/tkjIZrFs6lQ

https://youtu.be/tkjIZrFs6lQ

 

Liked what the gentlemen said about the talent in India, if India gets its selection right no one can beat us ever.. also we need cricket writers to talk about cricket rather then some of these duffer ex cricketers we have..

in the video he mentions greg chappell said if india gets it right no one can beat them infact they can have 3 teams n no one can beat any of them

Posted
2 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

ganguly is president he cant n shudnt interfere in team matters

Gambhir will be in CAC whose role wud be to select coach n selectors

 

If u really want these guys in decision making then put them in right job like Team director 

If thats the case then I hope Gauti doesnt renew Shastri's tenure once it ends in next year or so..

Posted
12 minutes ago, Sgattick10 said:

If thats the case then I hope Gauti doesnt renew Shastri's tenure once it ends in next year or so..

That is the hope but Kohli will try his best to avoid such a scenario. But with Ganguly and Gambhir you can expect that they won't be just sitting their to cater to Sastry and Kohli. They will make their dislikes known if not imposing their thoughts. Ganguly will be more diplomatic in his position, Gambhir will be relatively direct. Also I expect Gambhir to put in selectors who will value talent and not just go by Kohli's whims and fantasies. He identified and backed Saini against all odds. He also created a good core during his KKR days.

Posted
On 1/13/2020 at 9:41 PM, Ankit_sharma03 said:

he had great ideas but poor man-mngmt, dhoni kirsten implemented same idea with better man management 

Chappell broke ganguly hold who was pulling team down with his non-performance at the time. We had golden period in tests under dravid (1-0 wins in Eng & still decent WI, first test win in SA) and chapell. Plus fired up Ganguly returned to FC and came back strong for last 2 years of his career.

Posted
32 minutes ago, zen said:

I haven't clicked on the links in the OP but the difference b/w the two teams could be sincerity and planning. If I am not wrong, Aus even spent some time to study the dew's impact in Mumbai 

Planning, team culture wt focus on continuous improvement, ruthless culling of players, for eg. once they decided to move on from khwaja he's nowhere to be seen. We keep recycling ttf rejects.

Posted
Just now, Cricwala said:

Planning, team culture wt focus on continuous improvement, ruthless culling of players, for eg. once they decided to move on from khwaja he's nowhere to be seen. We keep recycling ttf rejects.

That is because we have no plan. In ODIs, we should ideally be focused on players in the 27-28 yrs or less age group to groom/improve them for WC23. At the moment, it appears as if we are betting on players who would be around 35 in WC23 -> Kohli (34), Rohit (35), Dhawan (37), Karthik (37; though not in the scheme of things currently), Shami (real age?), Bhuvi (33), Rahane (34), .... 

Posted

These cricket writers are saying what many of us fans have been saying for few years now. With massive funds & modernized training techniques we have accrued in last decade due to IPL, legacy of 2000s team which taught us to win overseas & development of fast bowling culture, we should have been a dominant force in cricket by now like China is in Olympics. Kohli-era chewtiyapa has slowed us down. 

 

Hopefully, this will be a world-beating team by 2026....of course,any of them can be replaced if we have a Tendulkar, or kapil dev burst on scene before then 

 

KL Rahul

Shaw

Padikkal/yashasvi

Gill

Pant

Pandya

Kuldeep

Saini 

Bumrah/Mavi (bumrahs action might force early exit)

Prasidh 

Nagarkotti

 

 

Posted

Jadeja has  been part of our ODIs since 2009. Yet, only 1 match winning fifty in his whole career. Yet we keep giving him place in our LOI team..

We keep trying Rahanes, Khaleel, Thakurs, Rayadus, Karthiks, Shankars again and again...

We played Jadhav from 2016 all the way till 2019 Wcup, who had an average of 43 and strike rate of 110, yet dropped him from the most important game (the SF of 2019) an put Kartik in.

 

We kept playiing Kuldeep from 2017 to 2019 and he kept winning matches, yet we dropped him in the most important game (the SF) over Chahal (who will always be inferior to Kuleep)

Posted
20 minutes ago, zen said:

That is because we have no plan. In ODIs, we should ideally be focused on players in the 27-28 yrs or less age group to groom/improve them for WC23. At the moment, it appears as if we are betting on players who would be around 35 in WC23 -> Kohli (34), Rohit (35), Dhawan (37), Karthik (37; though not in the scheme of things currently), Shami (real age?), Bhuvi (33), Rahane (34), .... 

Yup, Jadhav shld hv been dropped like a hot potato after 2019 WC as shld Dhoni - his sabbatical crap is just plain bs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...