Ankit_sharma03 Posted January 17, 2020 Posted January 17, 2020 Just now, Sandeep99 said: SHould be short of good length going by his style of bowling. Will be very useful in Australia. Even in SA
Hakuna Matata Posted January 17, 2020 Posted January 17, 2020 Someone asked why India didn't pick shami in semis. I think they got the answer. He is wicket taker but gives easy runs at the same time.
putrevus Posted January 17, 2020 Posted January 17, 2020 Just now, Sandeep99 said: SHould be short of good length going by his style of bowling. Will be very useful in Australia. That is his natural length not his stock delivery.
Sgattick10 Posted January 17, 2020 Posted January 17, 2020 1 minute ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: Aur koi sub nahi mila Ankit_sharma03 1
Sandeep99 Posted January 17, 2020 Posted January 17, 2020 Just now, putrevus said: That is his natural length not his stock delivery. I think we've not seen him enough to deduce his stock delivery then
putrevus Posted January 17, 2020 Posted January 17, 2020 1 minute ago, Hakuna Matata said: Someone asked why India didn't pick shami in semis. I think they got the answer. He is wicket taker but gives easy runs at the same time. Problem is people always want to find scapegoats. Bhuvi was safer option, Shami could win you matches but also has ability to leak runs, when playing with just two fast bowlers.You choose safe option most of the time. Bhuvi was not the problem in semifinal.Batting was the problem. Cricspin and nevada 2
zen Posted January 17, 2020 Author Posted January 17, 2020 4 minutes ago, Hakuna Matata said: Someone asked why India didn't pick shami in semis. I think they got the answer. He is wicket taker but gives easy runs at the same time. Different conditions!
Sandeep99 Posted January 17, 2020 Posted January 17, 2020 Even at this rate I'd still pick Shami or Bhuvi. Wew need wickets. Restricting runs won't help. raki05 1
Sandeep99 Posted January 17, 2020 Posted January 17, 2020 Watching Smith bat is good fun, I must admit Stan AF 1
Hakuna Matata Posted January 17, 2020 Posted January 17, 2020 1 minute ago, zen said: Different conditions! Bhuvi did well 10-1-43-3. We lost the match because of our poor batting. 240 is chaseable .
Sandeep99 Posted January 17, 2020 Posted January 17, 2020 Just now, Frustrated said: Saini getting pasted. He will come good after these kinds of outings believe me. Too often have our guys played against really bad teams.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now