Nitin’s call

[coffee_rules]

Abysmal umpires call. He needs to be fired 

[Serpico]

How can an umpire's call be 'abysmal'? If it was plumb lbw, it would have been overturned by ball tracking. Plenty of umpires made mistakes by not giving plumb LBWs, so its not exactly a rare occurrence. By the very definition, umpire's call is a 50-50 scenario.. even the technology cannot come to a definitive conclusion. How is that a firebale offence lol

 

If anything the other guy on field should be fired. He made two very dodgy decisions one in first innings and one in second

[GautiMaan]

Nitin Menon MBE

[putrevus]

5 hours ago, Serpico said:

How can an umpire's call be 'abysmal'? If it was plumb lbw, it would have been overturned by ball tracking. Plenty of umpires made mistakes by not giving plumb LBWs, so its not exactly a rare occurrence. By the very definition, umpire's call is a 50-50 scenario.. even the technology cannot come to a definitive conclusion. How is that a firebale offence lol

 

If anything the other guy on field should be fired. He made two very dodgy decisions one in first innings and one in second

Because as an umpire when you see that live, you as an umpire should know that impact will be at worst umpire's call. That is definition of plumb for a left arm spinner. Umpires cannot rule that in favour of batsmen. They are some decisions which bowlers have to get benefit of doubt everytime this is one such call.

 

As an umpire you can  no way think that impact was outside on that delivery. You are clearly seeing offstump. That is just bad umpiring.

 

 

Edited February 15, 2021 by putrevus

[nitinbwj]

 Indian Bucknor

[IndianRenegade]

4 hours ago, putrevus said:

Because as an umpire when you see that live, you as an umpire should know that impact will be at worst umpire's call. That is definition of plumb for a left arm spinner. Umpires cannot rule that in favour of batsmen. They are some decisions which bowlers have to get benefit of doubt everytime this is one such call.

 

As an umpire you can  no way think that impact was outside on that delivery. You are clearly seeing offstump. That is just bad umpiring.

 

 

The thing is umpires have missed even plumb decisions all the time, when it happened in real time he has very little time to see his leg had straightened. This is why you have reviews, how did technology say this is umpires call is the question? this shouldn't have been umpires call.

Edited February 15, 2021 by IndianRenegade

[chewy]

More importantly how the hell did Hawkeye show that 50/50, visually the impact is clear

 

Is this graphic processing/algorithm error?

[IndianRenegade]

15 minutes ago, chewy said:

More importantly how the hell did Hawkeye show that 50/50, visually the impact is clear

 

Is this graphic processing/algorithm error?

Exactly thats what we need to be more worried about. Umpires make mistakes, that is why you have technology, if the technology is making a mistake with what you can see as clear lbw in the replays then how many such lbws is hawkeye screwing up?

[flat_wicket_bully]

Umpires call should be discarded if the distance between projection and stumps is low 

I they can make this change to be more accurate

[IndianRenegade]

Also the original appeal in this case was for caught behind & not LBW. So how was the decision made regarding Umpires Call with regards to impact? confusing!

[neel roy]

2 hours ago, chewy said:

More importantly how the hell did Hawkeye show that 50/50, visually the impact is clear

 

Is this graphic processing/algorithm error?

Because leg is not a stationery object like wickets. So there is an inherent movement algorithm included in the umpires call which benefitted Root

[neel roy]

Most important question: has india lost a review as the original review was for caught behind?

[IndianRenegade]

1 minute ago, neel roy said:

Most important question: has india lost a review as the original review was for caught behind?

seems confusing.did umpire communicate what his intention was regarding impact? we didn't hear anything.

[coffee_rules]

3 hours ago, neel roy said:

Most important question: has india lost a review as the original review was for caught behind?

no it was retained because of Nitin’s call on impact.you could see the off stump in the frame how is that impact become a ump’s call? Chu saala

 

[Serpico]

4 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

3 hours ago, neel roy said:

 

no it was retained because of Nitin’s call on impact.you could see the off stump in the frame how is that impact become a ump’s call? Chu saala

It depends on which way the ball is moving. Your beef is with the computer

[kirkutfan]

Dang, are we into extremes. Human error is part of the game. Arguments are part of the game. The umpiring panel got a lot right. They are pretty new to international umpiring too. No way is this equivalent to the stuff Bucknor pulled. 

Edited February 16, 2021 by kirkutfan

[The Realist]

DRS is not cutting it. Cheap tech masquerading as the only solution - the ball tracking and assumptions are way off. Umpires call makes no sense either, its a crap call then overturn it.

 

For all the initial problems with VAR in football it is now a much better system than DRS

[coffee_rules]

1 hour ago, Serpico said:

It depends on which way the ball is moving. Your beef is with the computer

Ball was heading towards the off stump, I agree for umptcall on hitting stumps, how the hell do you call on impact , the angle of the ball’s direction and where it hit the leg, in a split second? Call on impact should be banned, s/w can decide that.

[Serpico]

3 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Ball was heading towards the off stump, I agree for umptcall on hitting stumps, how the hell do you call on impact , the angle of the ball’s direction and where it hit the leg, in a split second? Call on impact should be banned, s/w can decide that.

Would you have been okay if the algorithm flat out said the impact is outside?

[helperononline]

Kohli and teams need to stop whining england had two or three decision going against them 

But don't see them arguing with umpires