Jump to content

3rd Test - India vs England, Pink Test - D/N - *WTC Knockout Encounter*


SK_IH

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, SRT100 said:

 

There is no such rule as benefit of the doubt. Stop making up rules.

 

You need evidence to overturn the umpire's decision for LBW.

And there was clear evidence the ball was bat-pad. 

Of course, it was almost certainly pad-bat-pad, but the first pad hit was caught between frames and so as far as the TV umpire is considered did not exist. 
Giving it not out was the right decision, irrespective of the benefit of doubt. 

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, SRT100 said:

 

There is no such rule as benefit of the doubt. Stop making up rules.

 

You need evidence to overturn the umpire's decision for LBW.

There was no conclusive evidence that it is pad first , I saw all the replays. In that case it is always batsman who gets that benefit of doubt.

Edited by putrevus
Posted
Just now, chewy said:

+1

The third umpire is not using all the tools available to him, and yep always seems rushed to make a call

 

BCCI need to provide better training for these guys esp use of Tech

He’s made the right decision every time. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, SK_IH said:

Pope will come out sweeping & reverse sweeping. Ind should target under 100 all out now. Had Shamsuddin not fked the match would have been clearly in India's grasp.

\4

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, GoldenSun said:

Err, didn't he like move to England as a kid?

Doesnt work well with the narrative ,i am assuming.:giggle:

Edited by RAZPOR
Posted
1 minute ago, putrevus said:

There was no conclusive evidence that it is pad first , I saw all the replays. In that case it is always batsman who gets that benefit of doubt.

So did I. There was mid off replay that clearly showed the ball missing the bat.

 

As I said, there is NO such rule of benefit of the doubt.

Posted
2 minutes ago, putrevus said:

There was no conclusive eveidence that it is pad first , I saw all the replays. In that case it is always batsman who get that benefit of doubt.

Look harder then, it is what the third umpire did but bottled it. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...