Will Rohit Sharma be able to score another double century in ODIs?

[zen]

34 minutes ago, neel roy said:

I agree but again we cant just for the sake of it go hard at the beginning and lose a match in a tournament just to give middle order a run.. its all about maximising the chances of win..

 

For the first 50-60 runs, some of these guys bat unnecessarily over cautiously 

 

View overall figures

Primary team India

Opposition team Australia  or England  or India  or New Zealand  or Pakistan  or South Africa  or Sri Lanka  or West Indies

Start of match date greater than or equal to 1 Jan 2018

Runs scored less than or equal to 60

Batting position between 1 and 3

Ordered by batting strike rate (descending)

Overall figures

Player	Span	Mat	Inns	NO	Runs	HS	Ave	BF	SR	100	50	0	4s	6s
MA Agarwal	2020-2020	5	5	0	86	32	17.20	83	103.61	0	0	0	12	1
PP Shaw	2020-2020	3	3	0	84	40	28.00	82	102.43	0	0	0	12	2
S Dhawan	2018-2020	29	28	1	644	51*	23.85	719	89.56	0	1	2	99	5
V Kohli	2018-2020	22	21	3	590	60	32.77	728	81.04	0	2	1	55	5
KL Rahul	2019-2020	8	8	0	204	57	25.50	292	69.86	0	1	1	17	2
Shubman Gill	2019-2020	3	3	0	49	33	16.33	71	69.01	0	0	0	5	1
RG Sharma	2018-2020	28	27	0	507	57	18.77	738	68.69	0	3	2	56	10
AT Rayudu	2018-2018	2	2	2	43	31*	-	64	67.18	0	0	0	4	0

 

 

As I said, I would prefer an improvement in those SR rather than hope that they play like that to score a 200 in one of xyz games 

[Jamadagni]

5 hours ago, zen said:

 

For the first 50-60 runs, some of these guys bat unnecessarily over cautiously 

 

View overall figures

Primary team India

Opposition team Australia  or England  or India  or New Zealand  or Pakistan  or South Africa  or Sri Lanka  or West Indies

Start of match date greater than or equal to 1 Jan 2018

Runs scored less than or equal to 60

Batting position between 1 and 3

Ordered by batting strike rate (descending)

Overall figures

Player	Span	Mat	Inns	NO	Runs	HS	Ave	BF	SR	100	50	0	4s	6s
MA Agarwal	2020-2020	5	5	0	86	32	17.20	83	103.61	0	0	0	12	1
PP Shaw	2020-2020	3	3	0	84	40	28.00	82	102.43	0	0	0	12	2
S Dhawan	2018-2020	29	28	1	644	51*	23.85	719	89.56	0	1	2	99	5
V Kohli	2018-2020	22	21	3	590	60	32.77	728	81.04	0	2	1	55	5
KL Rahul	2019-2020	8	8	0	204	57	25.50	292	69.86	0	1	1	17	2
Shubman Gill	2019-2020	3	3	0	49	33	16.33	71	69.01	0	0	0	5	1
RG Sharma	2018-2020	28	27	0	507	57	18.77	738	68.69	0	3	2	56	10
AT Rayudu	2018-2018	2	2	2	43	31*	-	64	67.18	0	0	0	4	0

 

 

As I said, I would prefer an improvement in those SR rather than hope that they play like that to score a 200 in one of xyz games 

 

Never realised Rohit's strike rate was that poor. I now have to agree with you. Rohit might win make up his low strike rate in one out of 5 matches. For the rest 4, it puts pressure on others and they have to make up for his slow innings. 

 

Kohli's is not that bad. But he should be striking at 90+.

[zen]

4 minutes ago, Jamadagni said:

 

Never realised Rohit's strike rate was that poor. I now have to agree with you. Rohit might win make up his low strike rate in one out of 5 matches. For the rest 4, it puts pressure on others and they have to make up for his slow innings. 

 

Kohli's is not that bad. But he should be striking at 90+.

 

Kohli has said that they want to be more aggressive now so let's hope that translates in to some tangible improvement

[ShoonyaSifar]

Bachche ki jaan loge kya? The guy has 3 of the 8 200s scored in LOIs. Thats more than enough

 

However, I would love to see Rohit score a few  big 100s in the English summer in WTC finals and Eng tests.

Edited March 22, 2021 by ShoonyaSifar

[Jay]

52 minutes ago, sarchasm said:

That piece of stat is specifically filtered to pick only the matches where Rohit flopped. Its only value - comic value - is to demonstrate if you have a total lack in life and unhealthy obsession, you turn into a retard like @zen

 

If you take the cut-off date from that filter, you can see Rohit has played 45 matches in that time. In 28 of those matches where Rohit failed by his standards is shown in that stat above.

 

So what happened in the rest of 17 matches? RGS average 160 at a SR of 104.

 

 

I mean, here you have a opener who's practically winning you matches single-handedly in 17 out of 45 matches - 1 out of every 2.5 match. Now show me an opener who has done more......EVER.

Warner? But yes not many at all. Rohit is special. 

[sage]

Rohit will get the first ODI triple hundred. Bookmark this post. 

 

 

[zen]

2 hours ago, sarchasm said:

That piece of stat is specifically filtered to pick only the matches where Rohit flopped. Its only value - comic value - is to demonstrate if you have a total lack in life and unhealthy obsession, you turn into a retard like @zen

 

If you take the cut-off date from that filter, you can see Rohit has played 45 matches in that time. In 28 of those matches where Rohit failed by his standards is shown in that stat above.

 

So what happened in the rest of 17 matches? RGS average 160 at a SR of 104.

 

 

I mean, here you have a opener who's practically winning you matches single-handedly in 17 out of 45 matches - 1 out of every 2.5 match. Now show me an opener who has done more......EVER.

 

I suppose you are a lawyer? If so, I feel for your clients  ... By posting the above, you have further strengthened my point (also batsmen do well post 60 runs is already implied so there is no need to post the above in the first place duh) ...  Taking your stats at face value and adding 2 + 2, which you missed: 

 

First 50-60 runs, 61 to later (the four batsmen you have listed) 

 

Dhawan SR 90 -> then SR 102

Kohli SR 81 -> then SR 103

Rohit SR 69 -> then SR 104

 

Therefore, Dhawan & Kohli, the other highly experienced batsmen, match Rohit's performances despite starting off relatively quickly.  Kohli, who plays relatively faster, has a higher % of converting those 50-60 into 60+ scores  ... There is no real need to play extra slowly in most of your games (28 v 17, where he may have got chances too). He does have a higher avg (again received chances too), which is why he is still in the team 

 

Thank you! 

 

 

As for trying to make personal attacks, let's just say that likes you of you are probably only capable of that (so not surprised that you used the only skill you posses, like many on streets in Ind)    

 

 

Edited March 22, 2021 by zen

[zen]

 Also I see that the blocked poster @Laaloo is still running around trying to gain my attention  ... chute nahin hai, try somewhere else

 

@Rasgulla like you said, I am living in his head rent free

Edited March 22, 2021 by zen

[Laaloo]

31 minutes ago, zen said:

 Also I see that the blocked poster @Laaloo is still running around trying to gain my attention  ... chute nahin hai, try somewhere else

 

@Rasgulla like you said, I am living in his head rent free

It’s simple. I see you trolling, I hit the troll vote. Easy as that.

[zen]

19 minutes ago, sarchasm said:

Yeah, you keep doing that. Counting decimals like a panwaadi counts his chawanni at his paan ki dukaan.

 

Want your sherlock holmes medal for figuring out our Gurunath likes to settle in like the royalty he is before he goes medieval on bowlers? Bad news, doofus. Everyone on this forum knows that without any need for your comic statsguru filters. But unlike you, they also know Gurunath is SO good, this is a low risk, high reward strategy for the team. Unlike you, most here can see the bigger picture.

 

Data and stats isn't for you. Stick to making lameass initials like SDP to avoid future KLPDs.

 

 

Naam Gurnunath  and  needs tons of balls to settle down as if he is some entitled guy (also gets tons of chances) when everyone gets off quickly

 

Btw, where can I get a law degree w/o going to the college. When I was in Ind, I could do that but am out of touch now 

 

[SK_IH]

Yes, most likely in this series itself.

[raki05]

Rohit is the best opener in world since past 10 years. He is GOAT opener in odi along with Sachin.

[ShoonyaSifar]

2 hours ago, zen said:

 

I suppose you are a lawyer? If so, I feel for your clients  ... By posting the above, you have further strengthened my point (also batsmen do well post 60 runs is already implied so there is no need to post the above in the first place duh) ...  Taking your stats at face value and adding 2 + 2, which you missed: 

 

First 50-60 runs, 61 to later (the four batsmen you have listed) 

 

Dhawan SR 90 -> then SR 102

Kohli SR 81 -> then SR 103

Rohit SR 69 -> then SR 104

 

Therefore, Dhawan & Kohli, the other highly experienced batsmen, match Rohit's performances despite starting off relatively quickly.  Kohli, who plays relatively faster, has a higher % of converting those 50-60 into 60+ scores  ... There is no real need to play extra slowly in most of your games (28 v 17, where he may have got chances too). He does have a higher avg (again received chances too), which is why he is still in the team 

 

Thank you! 

 

 

As for trying to make personal attacks, let's just say that likes you of you are probably only capable of that (so not surprised that you used the only skill you posses, like many on streets in Ind)    

 

 

This manchild is shamelessly still stuck at those filtered cherry picked stats. Went into a hiding for a few months after the humiliation in the WC but refuses to learn.

[ShoonyaSifar]

4 hours ago, sarchasm said:

That piece of stat is specifically filtered to pick only the matches where Rohit flopped. Its only value - comic value - is to demonstrate if you have a total lack in life and unhealthy obsession, you turn into a retard like @zen

 

If you take the cut-off date from that filter, you can see Rohit has played 45 matches in that time. In 28 of those matches where Rohit failed by his standards is shown in that stat above.

 

So what happened in the rest of 17 matches? RGS average 160 at a SR of 104.

 

 

I mean, here you have a opener who's practically winning you matches single-handedly in 17 out of 45 matches - 1 out of every 2.5 match. Now show me an opener who has done more......EVER.

I schooled him enough on similar stats before the WC, when he went on a spree opening multiple threads a day to show his wizardry with StatsGuru filters. Thought he had learnt his lessons but then he refuses to learn

[ShoonyaSifar]

18 hours ago, zen said:

 

For the first 50-60 runs, some of these guys bat unnecessarily over cautiously 

 

View overall figures

Primary team India

Opposition team Australia  or England  or India  or New Zealand  or Pakistan  or South Africa  or Sri Lanka  or West Indies

Start of match date greater than or equal to 1 Jan 2018

Runs scored less than or equal to 60

Batting position between 1 and 3

Ordered by batting strike rate (descending)

Overall figures

Player	Span	Mat	Inns	NO	Runs	HS	Ave	BF	SR	100	50	0	4s	6s
MA Agarwal	2020-2020	5	5	0	86	32	17.20	83	103.61	0	0	0	12	1
PP Shaw	2020-2020	3	3	0	84	40	28.00	82	102.43	0	0	0	12	2
S Dhawan	2018-2020	29	28	1	644	51*	23.85	719	89.56	0	1	2	99	5
V Kohli	2018-2020	22	21	3	590	60	32.77	728	81.04	0	2	1	55	5
KL Rahul	2019-2020	8	8	0	204	57	25.50	292	69.86	0	1	1	17	2
Shubman Gill	2019-2020	3	3	0	49	33	16.33	71	69.01	0	0	0	5	1
RG Sharma	2018-2020	28	27	0	507	57	18.77	738	68.69	0	3	2	56	10
AT Rayudu	2018-2018	2	2	2	43	31*	-	64	67.18	0	0	0	4	0

 

 

As I said, I would prefer an improvement in those SR rather than hope that they play like that to score a 200 in one of xyz games 

Feel like being in April of 2019 again. Despite getting schooled, you are back at it. So here we go again.

 

You missed some of the best filters on Statsguru like when the windspeed was 5 kmph, on ground temperature was 30 degrees or more, when Kohli skipped his breakfast and lastly on days when you missed your grade 3 maths lessons.

[raki05]

I am not even sure why people looked in to stats when we have seen all these batsmen live . There can be difference of opinion on one's batting style but no body can question Rohit's match winning ability in Odis.  And as if it's halwa to make 200 by playing slow in odi , many of the legendry batsmen considered great by stats pandit couldn't able to make one even against zim/bd and here we have someone who has scored it 3 times and still people question his batting ability. Someone spoke about drop catches in wc to undermine his centuries , go and check Lara's 153 on which people get orgasm not just catches were dropped but there were so many plumb lbw not given by wi umpires. There is only one loophole in Rohit's performance so far is his  50 over wc final /sf  performance but in that regards all Indian batsmen are choker.

[zen]

Cricinfo probably took my cue and exposed how Rohit is able to get those runs:

 

 

 

By not taking his catches, the opposition messed Ind up. The middle order remained relatively undercooked and the guy went missing when it counted (and finally catch taken)

 

The guy is playing like 2-3 innings in one knock at times ... I wonder how many chances will he need to hit a 200 if he can probably on a small ground v some minnow 

 

More than tuk tuk (when the need is to be proactive), it could be about how many chances he gets ... even in the last T20, where he played his only decent inning in the series, he was dropped by Wood for e.g.

Edited March 22, 2021 by zen

[raki05]

Thank god catches were dropped or else India would have gone out in 3-4 straight defeats in wc, wasn't there a match where we were about to loose against Afg. Thanks to Rohit centuries that we reached till semi..... one match he failed and entire phony middle order collapsed like no tomorrow. That sows greatness of Rohit other batsmen catches were dropped as well but they couln't even capitalize look at others though there catches were dropped but they are so far behind in run tally.

Edited March 22, 2021 by raki05

[ShoonyaSifar]

6 minutes ago, zen said:

Cricinfo probably took my cue and exposed how Rohit is able to get those runs:

 

 

 

By not taking his catches, the opposition messed Ind up. The middle order remained relatively undercooked and the guy went missing when it counted (and finally catch taken)

 

The guy is playing like 2-3 innings in one knock at times 

Manchild, this is the reason why you should watch matches and not rely on Statsguru or cricinfo for your cricket analysis. But then that takes some effort and grown up grey cells.

 

Here is another lesson for you

Vs SA, Rohit 122* in a chase of 228, no one else scored a 50

Vs Aus Rohit 57(70), out in 23rd over, India 352/5

Vs Pakistani Rohit 140(113), out in 39th over, India 336/5

vs Afg, Rohit 1(10), India 224/8

Vs WI, Rohit 18(23), India 243/8

Vs Eng Rohit 102(109), out in 37th over, Ind 306/5

Vs BD - Rohit 104(92), out in 30th over, Ind 314/9

Vs SL - Rohit 103(93), out in 31st over, India 265/3

Vs NZ Rohit 1(4), India failed to chase 239

 

Conclusion by the manchild "Rohit hogged the strike which left the middle order undercooked" Go back to your grade 3 maths lessons 

[zen]

besides Wood's in the last T20 from what I recall, Archer dropped him too in one of the games 

 

 

 

 

 

No honey drops on this occasion  ... Eng should have dropped one more to help the poor guy get going and shore up his SR 

Edited March 22, 2021 by zen