Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Google, Facebook, WhatsApp Comply With New Digital Rules, Share Details with IT Ministry; Twitter Yet to

 
Quote

Large social media companies like Google, Facebook and WhatsApp have shared details with the IT Ministry as per the requirement of the new digital rules, but Twitter is still not following the norms, PTI reported citing government sources. Twitter has not sent details of the chief compliance officer to the IT Ministry, and shared details of a lawyer working in a law firm as a nodal contact person and grievance officer, the sources said.

 

https://www.news18.com/news/business/google-fb-whatsapp-comply-with-new-digital-rules-share-details-with-it-ministry-twitter-didnt-3788147.html

 

 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Trichromatic said:

 

Wondering what was the agenda behind posting made up definition. Trolling?

To get rid of jargon and complexity and tell that its BS that once something is encrypted it cant be shared with gvmnt, if company co-operates, most likely they have some solution in some part of their organisation. It purpose is not to match individualnposters technicall standards though. 
 

Also businessess can not simply transfer info without gvmnt having a abilty to intercept., be it posta, pacel, phone or email  ieod voice  txt 

Edited by mishra
Posted

Google can match images, whatsapp already distingushes betwen fwdes and not fwded message. How can it be that difficult to frind out originators of some BS.

Posted
1 hour ago, mishra said:

To get rid of jargon and complexity and tell that its BS that once something is encrypted it cant be shared with gvmnt, if company co-operates, most likely they have some solution in some part of their organisation. It purpose is not to match individualnposters technicall standards though. 
 

Also businessess can not simply transfer info without gvmnt having a abilty to intercept., be it posta, pacel, phone or email  ieod voice  txt 

 

Getting rid of jargon and complexity doesn't require twisting basics and posting wrong info.

\

Obvious attempt to mislead people with assumptions that readers on forums are fool to believe such things.

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

A right wing nut job hyperventilating about social media? That is new.


Yeah right wing nut job like Nicholas Wade. 

Edited by ravishingravi
Posted
23 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

A right wing nut job hyperventilating about social media? That is new.

Your reply instead should have been why did FB even shut down voices talking about lab leak theory. It was always the most plausible theory. 

Posted
22 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

A right wing nut job hyperventilating about social media? That is new.


@Mariyam Think this is live demonstration of what I was talking about. This is what has become of America in general. There are no first principles for discussion. The blood feud and echo chamber is so deep rooted that they are incapable of discussing second order effects or even first order. A polarised population like this is toxic for democracy in long run. India was maybe 50 years away from this kind of polarisation but we have been fast tracked into it by social media. India cannot afford this with stage of growth we are in. Personally, the ill effects outweigh the benefits of social media. Kills agility in thought process or cognitive thinking. If the intention is to have a flourishing democracy, we need a large section of agile thinkers. Social media certainly doesn’t encourage it, as we can see the basket case that’s America. 
 

On 5/26/2021 at 8:22 PM, ravishingravi said:

 

I have been following US politics just as a theatre or film for 20 odd years. I frankly thought many times that it is lunatic asylum and still do. And I was so glad that we didn't this kind of stupid polarization in India. We have our own issues, but this is blood feud echo chamber partisan talking points. Twitter especially combined with other media platforms has fast tracked us on that path. This is bad for democracy to have platforms that create more echo chambers and reinforce biases. We need to have considerable mass of people who are non aligned and can shift directions when required. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Trichromatic said:

 

Getting rid of jargon and complexity doesn't require twisting basics and posting wrong info.

\

Obvious attempt to mislead people with assumptions that readers on forums are fool to believe such things.

Just because you have a alternate view, you end up accusing me with “agenda driven”, “troll”, “misleading”. I accepted that your unknown unstated alternative theory is technically more superior because its coming from you, But that does not convince me that i need a hacking solution when i can achieve same result with a workaround. So i am going to stick with my theory

Posted
2 hours ago, ravishingravi said:


@Mariyam Think this is live demonstration of what I was talking about. This is what has become of America in general. There are no first principles for discussion. The blood feud and echo chamber is so deep rooted that they are incapable of discussing second order effects or even first order. A polarised population like this is toxic for democracy in long run. India was maybe 50 years away from this kind of polarisation but we have been fast tracked into it by social media. India cannot afford this with stage of growth we are in. Personally, the ill effects outweigh the benefits of social media. Kills agility in thought process or cognitive thinking. If the intention is to have a flourishing democracy, we need a large section of agile thinkers. Social media certainly doesn’t encourage it, as we can see the basket case that’s America. 
 

Since Trumpism can be held root cause of couple of deaths, so Bidenism fueled BLMis caused 10 times more deaths and destruction but only Trumpism needs banning.

Posted
6 hours ago, rkt.india said:

Your reply instead should have been why did FB even shut down voices talking about lab leak theory. It was always the most plausible theory. 

 

Rightwing in USA peddle 1000s of conspiracy theories.  This was one of those theories. 

Posted
3 hours ago, mishra said:

Since Trumpism can be held root cause of couple of deaths, so Bidenism fueled BLMis caused 10 times more deaths and destruction but only Trumpism needs banning.

BLMis fueledby Biden? Learning new things every day. BLM was for Blacks by Blacks.  10 times more deaths? 

Posted
5 hours ago, ravishingravi said:


@Mariyam Think this is live demonstration of what I was talking about. This is what has become of America in general. There are no first principles for discussion. The blood feud and echo chamber is so deep rooted that they are incapable of discussing second order effects or even first order. A polarised population like this is toxic for democracy in long run. India was maybe 50 years away from this kind of polarisation but we have been fast tracked into it by social media. India cannot afford this with stage of growth we are in. Personally, the ill effects outweigh the benefits of social media. Kills agility in thought process or cognitive thinking. If the intention is to have a flourishing democracy, we need a large section of agile thinkers. Social media certainly doesn’t encourage it, as we can see the basket case that’s America. 
 

 

One party was responsible for attacking CAPITOL HILL> One party is out there to suppress the votes sa they know that will make Republican party extinct. One party is out there to let the president spread conspiracy theories (40% of the covid conspiracy theories in USA came from one guy ) and not intervene him ,One party is out there to join in spreading the BIG LIE about election result. One party is out there to deny science, encourage gun violence, turn the other side when the president indulges in corrupt and anti-national acts.  Guy got impeached twice. Still had no interest in kicking him out. What polarisation you are talking about. So stop talking "both-siderism' here. I don't speak for India. In USA evil was kicked out.  Social media helped creating this monster in 2017. SO yea Social media realized the mistake only on Jan 6th, 2021 that too after Biden won.  Their guidelines changed. They started de-platforming both democrats and republicans. But only those who cry are right wing nutjobs.

Posted
4 hours ago, mishra said:

Just because you have a alternate view, you end up accusing me with “agenda driven”, “troll”, “misleading”. I accepted that your unknown unstated alternative theory is technically more superior because its coming from you, But that does not convince me that i need a hacking solution when i can achieve same result with a workaround. So i am going to stick with my theory

 

 

It's not even a debatable topic requiring opinions. 

 

Trying to cover up false information by giving it name of opinion and alternative view. At least that's good attempt.

 

Posted
6 hours ago, ravishingravi said:


@Mariyam Think this is live demonstration of what I was talking about. This is what has become of America in general. There are no first principles for discussion. The blood feud and echo chamber is so deep rooted that they are incapable of discussing second order effects or even first order. A polarised population like this is toxic for democracy in long run. India was maybe 50 years away from this kind of polarisation but we have been fast tracked into it by social media. India cannot afford this with stage of growth we are in. Personally, the ill effects outweigh the benefits of social media. Kills agility in thought process or cognitive thinking. If the intention is to have a flourishing democracy, we need a large section of agile thinkers. Social media certainly doesn’t encourage it, as we can see the basket case that’s America. 
 

 

In my opinion, Social Media is also like Democracy. If we let it to grow, then at some point it will get reformed itself. 

 

Yes in American we got the problem of Trump and Conspiracy theories. But at the end these same social media platforms became the mean of eradicating a big part of it. They fought against the conspiracy theories and finally they defeated them. The support for such conspiracy theories went downwards. 

 

======

 

Without Social Media, there will be complete "Dictatorship" in the society

 

And you blame social media for polarization of the society. 

 

But reality is this that without social media, we will have complete "Dictatorship" in the society. Government already controls all the Media houses. It is in position to control even the Media houses of the opposition too through blackmailing and through black tactics. 

 

Only thing which government could not control is the social media. No black tactics are going to stop the stop the social media from presenting the true side of story too. 

 

In corrupt societies like ours, where state organisations have been misused by governments, there positives of social media outperforms the negative side. 

 

And polarisation is not bad if it stays only to the difference of opinion. But note that in a Dictatorship you will not see the polarization while the stronger party already kills the opposition mercilessly. Therefore, Dictatorship is much worse than any polarisation. 

 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Alam_dar said:

 

In my opinion, Social Media is also like Democracy. If we let it to grow, then at some point it will get reformed itself. 

 

Yes in American we got the problem of Trump and Conspiracy theories. But at the end these same social media platforms became the mean of eradicating a big part of it. They fought against the conspiracy theories and finally they defeated them. The support for such conspiracy theories went downwards. 

 

======

 

Without Social Media, there will be complete "Dictatorship" in the society

 

And you blame social media for polarization of the society. 

 

But reality is this that without social media, we will have complete "Dictatorship" in the society. Government already controls all the Media houses. It is in position to control even the Media houses of the opposition too through blackmailing and through black tactics. 

 

Only thing which government could not control is the social media. No black tactics are going to stop the stop the social media from presenting the true side of story too. 

 

In corrupt societies like ours, where state organisations have been misused by governments, there positives of social media outperforms the negative side. 

 

And polarisation is not bad if it stays only to the difference of opinion. But note that in a Dictatorship you will not see the polarization while the stronger party already kills the opposition mercilessly. Therefore, Dictatorship is much worse than any polarisation. 

 


I can give a long winded reply but in absence of specifics, I cannot really do justice. I would just say two things. 
 

1) World wasnt  a dictatorship before social media. One dictatorship has certainly become the biggest super power of the century by passing the global social media. Other ones continue to rule. 
 

2) Your implication is that social media platforms are democratic. They have just unanimously banned ex president of USA without any trial while Taliban still has an official account. So, I think a refresher in democratic values is in order. 
 

So, I dare say, your arguments are not convincing. I want to be clear. If the platforms are acting as intermediaries only. I think they are useful even with an algorithm is set for conflict. However, if they are going to be editorial, then I trust India acts along the same lines as Poland, France and Germany. 

Edited by ravishingravi
×
×
  • Create New...