Khota Posted September 13, 2021 Author Posted September 13, 2021 44 minutes ago, New guy said: Because sri lanka series came after IPL. I am using uour own logic, only the latest series should be taken and everything else ignored And he was the best.
Ankit_sharma03 Posted September 13, 2021 Posted September 13, 2021 8 minutes ago, Khota said: When I was 10 years old my analytical ability was better than yours. You do not understand stats and that is why you are confused. Blamme your stat teachers not me. If you dont assign a weight to a bowler runs scored are meaningless. Digest this and then discuss. Go back in time and call that 10 yr old weight to bowler- so dhawan scored at avg of 28 in sl and s.r of 108 against a poor side like SL and comparing him to batsman who also didnt get selected for Wc makes him viable over players who have done well in international against high quality sides at better far better s/r
ShoonyaSifar Posted September 13, 2021 Posted September 13, 2021 @Khota Dhawan scoring at 134 success for you is great, Pant scoring at 132 is seen as failure for him. KL scoring 65+ runs@130 SR was criticised. That's the basic difference. On IPL stats for 2021 half season, Rahul, Shaw and Samson all score at much higher SR than Dhawan. Why should them and not Dhawan be the preferred picks.
Jay Posted September 13, 2021 Posted September 13, 2021 Lmao. What. Surely khota is trolling. We all know what a beast dhawan is in odi. He was badly missed in 2019 WC semi final. But t20? I don't recall him doing too well my bro.
New guy Posted September 13, 2021 Posted September 13, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, Khota said: And he was the best. No, as I showed with stats Yadav and Kishan were better and selected Yadav average in Sri lanka 50. Strike rate 147 Kishan - average infinity, strike rate 143 Dhawan averaged 28 with strike rate 108 which is very very poor and reason why he wasnt selected. Edited September 13, 2021 by New guy
Khota Posted September 13, 2021 Author Posted September 13, 2021 4 hours ago, ShoonyaSifar said: @Khota Dhawan scoring at 134 success for you is great, Pant scoring at 132 is seen as failure for him. KL scoring 65+ runs@130 SR was criticised. That's the basic difference. On IPL stats for 2021 half season, Rahul, Shaw and Samson all score at much higher SR than Dhawan. Why should them and not Dhawan be the preferred picks. Can you check that for me and see how many runs Dhawan and rahul scored.
nitinbwj Posted September 13, 2021 Posted September 13, 2021 (edited) I was watching the highlights of T20 WC 2016 Ind v Australia and we required 60 plus runs in under 6 overs with Kohli and Dhoni at crease. Kohli cut, pulls, drives, lofts for sixes and he single handedly scores 45 plus runs of 15-16 balls. He was THE beast at that time. He took runs of everyone..Watson, Coulter Nile and another bowler. Dhoni scored the customery last over 4 when the equation was bought down from 11.6 to under 6. WTH happened to that Kohli He looked more fitter with no stupid beard and of course not married Shocking to see the downfall and regression. Edited September 13, 2021 by nitinbwj SRT100 and rollingstoned 1 1
Khota Posted September 13, 2021 Author Posted September 13, 2021 21 hours ago, Pollack said: Batsman A in t20. F
Lord Posted September 13, 2021 Posted September 13, 2021 7 minutes ago, nitinbwj said: I was watching the highlights of T20 WC 2016 Ind v Australia and we required 60 plus runs in under 6 overs with Kohli and Dhoni at crease. Kohli cut, pulls, drives, lofts for sixes and he single handedly scores 45 plus runs of 15-16 balls. He was THE beast at that time. He took runs of everyone..Watson, Coulter Nile and another bowler. Dhoni scored the customery last over 4 when the equation was bought down from 11.6 to under 6. WTH happened to that Kohli He looked more fitter with no stupid beard and of course not married Shocking to see the downfall and regression. how much Dhawan got?
ShoonyaSifar Posted September 13, 2021 Posted September 13, 2021 36 minutes ago, Khota said: Can you check that for me and see how many runs Dhawan and rahul scored. Rahul 331 in 7 matches Dhawan 380 in 8 Let Dhawan continue to be the best IPL batsman. We have enough younger and more aggressive batsmen to take his (and other seniors) spot
vishalvirsingh Posted September 13, 2021 Posted September 13, 2021 kohli ..Kl and ROHIT, followed by Surya are our top 4 batsman..ishan kishan/rishabh, hardik to follow. i think indian t20 batting is sorted, if our bowlers bowl well we will reach the FINALS. i expect our batting to suceed most often.
RedFever Posted September 13, 2021 Posted September 13, 2021 KL Rahul has scores of 0,0,0, 14 in the T20I played in 2021, how does he become an automatic selection in playing 11
Ankit_sharma03 Posted September 13, 2021 Posted September 13, 2021 34 minutes ago, RedFever said: KL Rahul has scores of 0,0,0, 14 in the T20I played in 2021, how does he become an automatic selection in playing 11 he is india's 2nd best t20 batsman................u dnt drop a player with his freaking good record for 3-4 bad scores. Everyone will have such bad scores in their career
Khota Posted September 13, 2021 Author Posted September 13, 2021 5 hours ago, ShoonyaSifar said: Rahul 331 in 7 matches Dhawan 380 in 8 Let Dhawan continue to be the best IPL batsman. We have enough younger and more aggressive batsmen to take his (and other seniors) spot Why would a best in IPL not be the best in the world??
Khota Posted September 13, 2021 Author Posted September 13, 2021 11 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: Go back in time and call that 10 yr old weight to bowler- so dhawan scored at avg of 28 in sl and s.r of 108 against a poor side like SL and comparing him to batsman who also didnt get selected for Wc makes him viable over players who have done well in international against high quality sides at better far better s/r I like your spirit. He was the best in SL. He is the best in IPL. But he is not good enough for @Ankit_sharma03
Ankit_sharma03 Posted September 14, 2021 Posted September 14, 2021 14 minutes ago, Khota said: I like your spirit. He was the best in SL. He is the best in IPL. But he is not good enough for @Ankit_sharma03 Andho men kaana raja Best at what ?? Beating 3-4 batsman we had rest all were bowlers His best also had poor avg n s/r ......so his best was so poor Infact even in that series SKY had better avg n s/r, if not for covid he wud have done better 9 players got covid thats how he became best in series coz hardly few were left to compete Best in IPl....so play in IPL. Coz he has failed to convert that in international
Ankit_sharma03 Posted September 14, 2021 Posted September 14, 2021 17 minutes ago, Khota said: I like your spirit. He was the best in SL. He is the best in IPL. But he is not good enough for @Ankit_sharma03 he is not good enough for anyone. Do u see anyone agreeing with you ?? No Do u see Him in Wc squad ?? No Ur the only one
Ankit_sharma03 Posted September 14, 2021 Posted September 14, 2021 Now repeat after me Dhawan selection was the main reason we didnt win last two t20 Wcs in 2014 and 2016
Khota Posted September 14, 2021 Author Posted September 14, 2021 6 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: Andho men kaana raja Best at what ?? Beating 3-4 batsman we had rest all were bowlers His best also had poor avg n s/r ......so his best was so poor Infact even in that series SKY had better avg n s/r, if not for covid he wud have done better 9 players got covid thats how he became best in series coz hardly few were left to compete Best in IPl....so play in IPL. Coz he has failed to convert that in international So many ifs and buts but no facts.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now