Jump to content

India vs Pakistan - September 4 - Pre Match Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, Nikhil_cric said:

Unless Chahar gets swing upfront, he is completely useless with the ball. He doesn't offer anything else. 

  • chahar doesnt leak runs like Avesh
  • He has enough variation to even survive as defensive bowlers
  • Chahar on his good days runs through top order and on his bad days doesnt leak as much as avesh . Avesh bad days have been far worse then chahar bad days and on goods days i dont need to tell that chahar is a match winner
  • Under lights kookabura always swing for a while 
  • Also he offers batting

 

The guy who has been most ineffective without swing is not bhuvi or chahar it has been prasidh krishna 

Edited by Ankit_sharma03
Posted
1 hour ago, IndianRenegade said:

 

the same attack that cloud not do sh!t against HK is somehow producing results.  

 

 

 

 

 

Exactly !

 

Without the pace and bounce of Hardik, our bowling attack wax totally ineffective against newbie Hong Kong.

 

 

Posted
31 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

He meant was speed looks glamorous but doesnt mean the ones with less speed arent effective. 

Its not safety our speed guys currently arent that effective. Reality is guys like arshdeep, bhuvi, deepak , harshal has delivered. At the end performance matters , speed is exciting but result matters  

Harshal Boobie Chahar are veterans and product of system & Culture that wants line length medium pacers. 

Pakistan is totally contrary they discard these type of bowlers at an early stage but we reward them. 

Unless & until we change that young pacers will never get chances... And constant opportunity. 

Someone like Tyagi should have played at least 15-20 ODIs by last U19 WC.  Makes no sense they carry him in Aus Test tour but don't even pick him over likes of Sakariya in SL.  System is rotten & ineffective. 

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

 

Exactly !

 

Without the pace and bounce of Hardik, our bowling attack wax totally ineffective against newbie Hong Kong.

 

 

It was like watching those glorious days of early 90's.....  Give me Zak Nehra Irfan SreeSanth over this trash. 

Edited by Lone Wolf
Posted
15 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

It was like watching those glorious days of early 90's.....  Give me Zak Nehra Irfan SreeSanth over this trash. 

Erm. We had Srinath in early 90s. This is more like post 2013 watching the likes of Praveen Kumar, Vinay Kumar etc

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Harshal Boobie Chahar are veterans and product of system & Culture that wants line length medium pacers. 

 

at the end that matters, any speed on wrong length will be in stands .......any speed

Watch sachin six on akthar in 2003 wc ...........poor line length smashed ..............then watch dismissal short ball again but on right line 

 

Same system has produced many more trundlers who are no where in picture as compare to our current pacers

Harshal - bhuvi- chahar have done the job for india and franchises that's why they are valued 

 

9 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Pakistan is totally contrary they discard these type of bowlers at an early stage but we reward them. 

 

Hasnt made them world champion that we need to follow that template .

They also play with tape balls which makes them control swing more and generate more power while bowling we shud start that also first. 

 

Question is who is effective or who is not ??  

 

Also we need to understand pakistan and India are different, pakistan can afford to throw these guys coz they have so many spots avl but we dont

In a top team making place is always tough which was the case with 2000 Aussies.........................making to that side was the toughest and they use to take 30+ guys .

We threw in irfan,balaji, zak, nehra , rp, sreesanth in 2000s coz places were locked so many spots were. Had these guys played today they wud have found it hard 

Its hard to make it into a Top side 

 

Also its a big myth that we discourage pacers now , they arent making as they arent developed enough and as i said its tough to make it to a top side then a poor side like pakistan. Btw in pakistan also dahani didnt make it easily to the side. The ones who are developed are making it to squad 

Aussie are taking Kane richardson not Meredith coz Meredith has his own negative value and limitations 

 

 

9 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Unless & until we change that young pacers will never get chances... And constant opportunity. 

 

Would you play them at cost of result ?? Genuine question

coz i remember even you werent ready to back umran after his poor games 

 

9 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Someone like Tyagi should have played at least 15-20 ODIs by last U19 WC.  Makes no sense they carry him in Aus Test tour but don't even pick him over likes of Sakariya in SL.  System is rotten & ineffective. 

 

Tyagi fitness has been an issue how could he ?? he hasnt even played 15-20 games over all in from 2020 till now 

Specially in pandemic their hasnt been much cricket

TBH he isnt even ready and he hasnt made a big impact for his own franchise apart from few overs. Atleast umran-mohsin can show one big season 

Edited by Ankit_sharma03
Posted
8 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Fbyh3Z2VsAA-5S_?format=jpg&name=medium

 

Afeem 

 

Wow. Hands down the worst take of all time. Kohli literally played like Bradman in two T20 WCs. Babar, Rizwan etc can only dream of playing like that. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

I have the same question

 

41 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

Can he be picked? Only in the standbys

 

No. They haven't released Avesh yet. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:
  • chahar doesnt leak runs like Avesh
  • He has enough variation to even survive as defensive bowlers
  • Chahar on his good days runs through top order and on his bad days doesnt leak as much as avesh . Avesh bad days have been far worse then chahar bad days and on goods days i dont need to tell that chahar is a match winner
  • Under lights kookabura always swing for a while 
  • Also he offers batting

 

The guy who has been most ineffective without swing is not bhuvi or chahar it has been prasidh krishna 

Prasidh's strength has never been swing. He is lanky and should put on some more muscle to get stronger and bowl a heavy length ball. His role is to hit the deck.

 

We already have a 132-135 kph accurate swing and seam bowler in Bhuvaneshwar.  Chahar is more of the same. I'm not saying Avesh is the answer but atleast he offers something different - poor as he is. 

Posted

Zero hype or build up for this game. Goes to show why a bilateral series between the two sides won't be that big of a deal as people think. 

 

If not for the bilateral ban, this so called rivalry would have been dead by now. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

 

at the end that matters, any speed on wrong length will be in stands .......any speed

Watch sachin six on akthar in 2003 wc ...........poor line length smashed ..............then watch dismissal short ball again but on right line 

 

Same system has produced many more trundlers who are no where in picture as compare to our current pacers

Harshal - bhuvi- chahar have done the job for india and franchises that's why they are valued 

 

 

Hasnt made them world champion that we need to follow that template .

They also play with tape balls which makes them control swing more and generate more power while bowling we shud start that also first. 

 

Question is who is effective or who is not ??  

 

Also we need to understand pakistan and India are different, pakistan can afford to throw these guys coz they have so many spots avl but we dont

In a top team making place is always tough which was the case with 2000 Aussies.........................making to that side was the toughest and they use to take 30+ guys .

We threw in irfan,balaji, zak, nehra , rp, sreesanth in 2000s coz places were locked so many spots were. Had these guys played today they wud have found it hard 

Its hard to make it into a Top side 

 

Also its a big myth that we discourage pacers now , they arent making as they arent developed enough and as i said its tough to make it to a top side then a poor side like pakistan. Btw in pakistan also dahani didnt make it easily to the side. The ones who are developed are making it to squad 

Aussie are taking Kane richardson not Meredith coz Meredith has his own negative value and limitations 

 

 

 

Would you play them at cost of result ?? Genuine question

coz i remember even you werent ready to back umran after his poor games 

 

 

Tyagi fitness has been an issue how could he ?? he hasnt even played 15-20 games over all in from 2020 till now 

Specially in pandemic their hasnt been much cricket

TBH he isnt even ready and he hasnt made a big impact for his own franchise apart from few overs. Atleast umran-mohsin can show one big season 

I was strongly supporting to play Umran in Zim ODIs & even called his exclusion more & more puzzling.  Avesh has done nothing worth mentioning.  We discarded Khaleel who played Asia Cup & had way way tougher assignments as a 20 ye old including NZ tour...  Avesh has had chances to minnow bash yet he isn't good enough. 

 

Tyagi was fit & Fine when squad was picked for SL tour in 2021..  Sakariya will never play for Ind again...  So what was the point of wasting those games over there. 

 

Harshal has been mediocre for all eternity...  Yes his couple of seasons in last IPl has been good but he is 30+..  And a T20 veteran almost. 

 

Lot of Tape ball cricket played in India too..  In fact more than Pak..   Umran is also a Tape ball product like Haris Rauf. 

 

Naseem Shaheen have come from proper system...  Right from age group U19 systems. 

 

As far as results go...  There's two ways to look at it.  If there's vision involved then why not.  If we won't try out players be Ire WI Zim..  What's the point of these games...  Bumrah is always injured or rested..  Shami doesn't plays LOIs much bar ICc events. 

I personally feel ODIs should be testing ground for these young pacers.  More they bowl more experience they get...  Hazlewood Starc all became world class T20 bowlers after proving their ODI numbers. 

 

Remember these guys don't travel & play in various leagues  so naturally skill wise they will be less inferior to other Pak pacers. 

Same case with SL...  It took a while for Chameera & Kumara to develop...  And Kumara while a exciting Test match bowler... Still hasn't yet found his footing in LOIs..  Partially due to injuries & lot less exposure. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...