Is it time to have a different set of selectors and coaching staff for Limited overs (odis+T20)

[vayuu1]

Since our current set of selectors are oblivious to the necessities of current style of limited overs plus TM management especially coaching staff is still following same Process which gives zilch result, don't u think we can certainly do with separate set of selectors and coaching staff Along with two different captain ,a coach who not only understands the requirements of current time but also improve and revolutionize the brand of cricket we play ,i would personally prefer  ponting for loi and give him youngsters 

[zen]

Yes, if you have viable options, why not?

 

Discussed some aspects of it below:

 

 

[Vk1]

they are not open to having different set of cricketers and coaches etc across formats.. you are asking about selectors 

[express bowling]

Selectors should be selected based on whether they meet certain pre-decided and necessary criteria. And not because they don't have jobs as commentators or coaches. 

 

Coaches should be selected based on whether they meet certain pre-decided and necessary criteria too. And not because they are prominent figures in Indian cricket.

 

 

[Mariyam]

Why do we even have selectors?

 

Its basically a redundant role. Also, it makes life difficult for a coach. He has to employ strategies based on what talent he has at his disposal which he may not have necessarily picked.

 

 

It would be nice if the coach were the chief selector. Maybe had a few minions so that the BCCI can show salaries as an operating expense. And the coach decides who he picks and what his strategy is. Makes a lot more sense than the current set up.

 

[straighttalk]

15 minutes ago, Mariyam said:

Why do we even have selectors?

 

Its basically a redundant role. Also, it makes life difficult for a coach. He has to employ strategies based on what talent he has at his disposal which he may not have necessarily picked.

 

 

It would be nice if the coach were the chief selector. Maybe had a few minions so that the BCCI can show salaries as an operating expense. And the coach decides who he picks and what his strategy is. Makes a lot more sense than the current set up.

 

Makes so much sense. And I would say the present selectors should be talent scouts...and then coach makes final decision along with captain. If he can't deliver fire him.

 

[Vilander]

Like every job there should be a performance review and unacceptable performance should mean being fired from the job. Fire Dravid, Chetan, mohanty, and kuruvilla. They are in competent. Dravid esp should be allowed to be a good boy in his home and asked not to come anywhere near an Indian team. Lol 

[wanted_desi]

Ganguly has to go because he is setting his buddies for Jobs. 

[cricketfan28]

Need massive failure for things to change, another early exit helps.

[AKane]

More bureaucracy is not going to help.

[singhvivek141]

Competency is the key here, selectors/Coaching staff should be in touch with the modern style of cricket.
If I remember correctly, Mohinder Amarnath mentioned in past that selectors should pass a minimum criteria of 25 Tests and/or 50 ODI's in International arena, currently only Joshi and Chetan qualifies that criteria.

[vvvslaxman]

T20 should be highly role-based/form-based   less experience-based/reputation-based/seniority based. So different criterias should be applied. They shouldn't be hesitating to bring in a total stranger. England constantly pushes new players in. Here we have Rohit/DK both made debut in 2007.