Jump to content

BCCI vs Rest of World (Revenue)


sage

Recommended Posts

Posted
54 minutes ago, sage said:

Sri Lanka vs Bangladesh is an embarrassment for the Bangladeshs


but hey bangla bros get as much Pakistani, that makes me l o l

Posted
2 hours ago, ThirtyD. said:

This obviously doesn’t include IPL figures, or does it?

Doesn't include domestic T20 leagues of any of the countries I think

Posted
4 hours ago, Bigg Brother said:

Not much gap between BCCI and CA. The way people sing songs about BCCI's richness, i thought the gulf between 1st and 2nd would be bigger..


It kind of is. IPL brings in as much money if not more but I don’t think it’s the same for Big bash. However, credit to CA for having such a revenue in a country where cricket is not followed as religiously as it is in India.

Posted (edited)

And BCCI's numbers are also dependent on a Billion plus population market. Aussies are how many ? Like 20-25 Million. From the number it looks like Aussies are the biggest revenue generators in Cricket ( relative to Population ).

Edited by javier26
Posted

Test Cricket , the 5 days game is definitely followed more passionately in England and Australia. Come during the boxing day Summer Test, Aussies will be making record of 80k, 90k fans in the stadium.. where in India will so many people flock to stadium to watch a Test match ? 

Posted
2 hours ago, sarchasm said:

Cricket is more religiously followed in AUS and UK compared to India. It's simply the size of India that makes people blind to the fact that on a proportionate basis, Indians care less about cricket than those in ENG and AUS.

 

 

At last someone says this. It's so obviously true, it's strange that people think otherwise.

Posted
2 hours ago, sarchasm said:

Cricket is more religiously followed in AUS and UK compared to India. It's simply the size of India that makes people blind to the fact that on a proportionate basis, Indians care less about cricket than those in ENG and AUS.

 

25 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

 

At last someone says this. It's so obviously true, it's strange that people think otherwise.

 

That's not true at all. Per capita numbers are higher simply because they're a richer country.

 

(1) If average income is $40,000 and people spend 1% on cricket that's $400 revenue.

(2) If average income is $2,000 and people spend 10% on cricket that's $200 revenue.

 

Scenario (2) would 'care' more about cricket but have lower per capita revenue.

 

Posted
30 minutes ago, sarchasm said:

 

The post is not about revenue at all. How did you conclude my post or @express bowling's post had anything to do with revenue?

How else can you argue that cricket is 'more religiously followed in the UK than India' - that's obviously not true

Posted (edited)

Even Pakistani numbers look impressive considering their Population is 1/6th of India and less said the better about their economy compared to India. 

 

PCB is generating that much revenue without playing any home series against India. More impressive.

Edited by javier26
Posted
On 11/21/2022 at 9:13 AM, express bowling said:

 

 

At last someone says this. It's so obviously true, it's strange that people think otherwise.

it's actually neither ind, eng or aus.

 

for eng, the no. 1 sport is footer by a big margin. for aus, a variety of diff sports especially Ozzie rules football. for ind, it is the tamasha of bollywood and politics.

 

I'd say most religious following is from East and West Pak

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...