Jump to content

India Squad for BAN series announced


Recommended Posts

Posted

Harshit Rana should've been picked instead of Bumrah. Doesn't make sense to play Bumrah and good to see what Harshit can do as need guys with pace in Australia. Also, they could've probably given Musheer Khan a go instead of KL Rahul. Musheer seems mature and quite talented, and would've been a great left field pick.

Posted
16 minutes ago, test fan said:

Mohammad Siraj.

Akash Deep. 

Yash Dayal.

 

3 Pacers from RCB out of 4 in Team India's Squad for 1st Test Match against Bangladesh.:phehe:

Test and T20s are different formats..the players may perform differently..it doesnt mean i am advoacting Yash Dayal's selection though..

Posted
46 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said:

Harshit Rana should've been picked instead of Bumrah. Doesn't make sense to play Bumrah and good to see what Harshit can do as need guys with pace in Australia. Also, they could've probably given Musheer Khan a go instead of KL Rahul. Musheer seems mature and quite talented, and would've been a great left field pick.

Too early for Musheer.  Let him play A tour games.  Not a finished product from whatever I saw in U19 WC final in Benoni where Aussie quicks troubled him with pace and Bounce.

Can't take a rookie like him to Australia.

 

Agreed on Harshit here

Posted
8 hours ago, Jaydev_Unadkat said:

 

Nobody is BETTER than their STATS

Stats show exactly what a player is.

Rest is all BS. 
Talent, charisma, bla bla bla 
KL is exactly what he is a 34 average batter who plays well once or twice in 10 tests.

This is the SAME BS that made RAHANE play well past his sell by date

Stats are like miniskirts.. they reveal more than they hide :p:

PS: courtesy Sidhu paaji

Posted
1 hour ago, test fan said:

Mohammad Siraj.

Akash Deep. 

Yash Dayal.

 

3 Pacers from RCB out of 4 in Team India's Squad for 1st Test Match against Bangladesh.:phehe:

what a turnaorund for Yash Dayal who could not defend 29 runs vs  Rinku Singh and now he finds himself in Indian team

Posted (edited)
55 minutes ago, diga said:

Stats are like miniskirts.. they reveal more than they hide :p:

PS: courtesy Sidhu paaji

…  “stats are like bikinis, they show every thing except the most important thing” thokkooo thali

I think Sidhu Paji was more in those lines :whack3:

Edited by Jaydev_Unadkat
Posted
2 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Too early for Musheer.  Let him play A tour games.  Not a finished product from whatever I saw in U19 WC final in Benoni where Aussie quicks troubled him with pace and Bounce.

Can't take a rookie like him to Australia.

 

Agreed on Harshit here

yeah we need him to be a better bowler,not an all rounder but a bowler we can rely on to get a few wickets if we need it.

Posted
11 hours ago, singhvivek141 said:

Exactly, it might inspire him to be better version of what he already is.
Ban series is of 2 tests, where I doubt pacers will be needed much. Australia series is the real prize where you have to play 3 to 4 quicks.

I guess 6 pacers will go to Australia and 2 spinners ( if they select 3 they would be foolish).

So apart from Suraj shammi boom...only one seat seems booked right now that is akashdeep. It seems 5th position could go to Yash Dayal but still 5th and 6th position are open.

Nitish reddy also has outside chance as Dubey won't be selected.a bouncer he bowled yesterday to hit kuldeep yadav on his helmet was 136.5k n perfect height.

But I was impressed with akashdeep..immaculate line n length n I am sure his pace will improve.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, vishalvirsingh said:

I guess 6 pacers will go to Australia and 2 spinners ( if they select 3 they would be foolish).

So apart from Suraj shammi boom...only one seat seems booked right now that is akashdeep. It seems 5th position could go to Yash Dayal but still 5th and 6th position are open.

Nitish reddy also has outside chance as Dubey won't be selected.a bouncer he bowled yesterday to hit kuldeep yadav on his helmet was 136.5k n perfect height.

But I was impressed with akashdeep..immaculate line n length n I am sure his pace will improve.

Agree, what I meant to say was 3 or 4 quicks in the XI. Overal, yes we need to have atleast 5-6 fast bowlers.
Nitish Reddy is good, has shown that he has the raw ingredients, but he need to develop it more. I sense batting is his stronger suit than bowling, and I see glimpses of Shane Watson in him (Watto was very similar to Nitish when started). But I don't see him going to Australia at this moment as long as Ashwin & jadeja are in the mix.

Dube, well I think it would be un-wise to consider him an allrounder. He is more like Ganguly or at max Nathan Astle with bowl. Can give you few overs here and there, but isn't a reliable bowler. Nitish is much better than him.

Edited by singhvivek141
Posted (edited)

There's unsettling confusion as to if and where to play Gill and KL Rahul. Honestly, Rohit shan't play either of them. Heck, they can't even be depended on as senior India A players to chase a pretty easy total for their supposed calibre. Sincerely feel that Sarfaraz and Axar Patel should play above both of them. The balance will be awesome with 3 spinners and 3 pacers in Indian pitches, and Patel has been in solid touch for so long, everybody is growing a beard waiting for his consistent selection in Test matches. Saved his team's ass in both the innings, like Musheer Khan. They can even play the extra spinner, Kuldeep Yadav, instead of Axar Patel as Ban have plenty of left-handers and keep the batting order till No 7 at Ashwin. Or, they can replace Ashwin with Yadav. But, please don't play Gill or Rahul.

Edited by Chamsi
Posted
2 hours ago, Chamsi said:

The balance will be awesome with 3 spinners and 3 pacers in Indian pitches,

You don't need 6 bowlers in tests At least 2 will be underbowled. Who does that apart from GOAT Eng teams :cantstop:

Posted
9 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Too early for Musheer.  Let him play A tour games.  Not a finished product from whatever I saw in U19 WC final in Benoni where Aussie quicks troubled him with pace and Bounce.

Can't take a rookie like him to Australia.

 

Agreed on Harshit here

 

He definitely isn't a finished product by any means but has the right attitude. Not sure about taking a meek KL to Aus. In Aus you need guys like Pant, and meek players like KL get shown up. Earlier it made sense to go with KL as backup wkt keeper. But with Jurel staking a claim, Sarfaraz and Musheer are a better bet in the middle order compared to KL.

Posted

Not bad but no point of Dayal selection. He warms the bench and gets dropped. I do not like placeholder selections.

 

Likely Playing 11- 

 

Rohit 

Jaiswal 

Gill

Kohli

KL Rahul 

Pant(wkt)

Jadeja 

Ashwin 

Kuldeep

Akash deep

Bumrah 

 

They could play Siraj instead of Akash deep and may be dumb enough to sit Kuldeep. 

 

Jurel will miss out and so will Sarfaraz. To be honest I am not as impressed with Sarfaraz as many here. He is ok for home tests and is aggressive but falls short for that crucial middle order (No.5 ) role . He seems like the kind who comes for few years and fades away.  Not that I want KL Rahul back. 

 

Can we get another VVS Laxman please :--D

Posted
10 hours ago, Ultimate_Game said:

Harshit Rana should've been picked instead of Bumrah. Doesn't make sense to play Bumrah and good to see what Harshit can do as need guys with pace in Australia. Also, they could've probably given Musheer Khan a go instead of KL Rahul. Musheer seems mature and quite talented, and would've been a great left field pick.

Musheer bowls left arm spin too. Can be a very handy batting alrounder. 

Posted
1 hour ago, cricspirit said:

Not bad but no point of Dayal selection. He warms the bench and gets dropped. I do not like placeholder selections.

 

Likely Playing 11- 

 

Rohit 

Jaiswal 

Gill

Kohli

KL Rahul 

Pant(wkt)

Jadeja 

Ashwin 

Kuldeep

Akash deep

Bumrah 

 

They could play Siraj instead of Akash deep and may be dumb enough to sit Kuldeep. 

 

Jurel will miss out and so will Sarfaraz. To be honest I am not as impressed with Sarfaraz as many here. He is ok for home tests and is aggressive but falls short for that crucial middle order (No.5 ) role . He seems like the kind who comes for few years and fades away.  Not that I want KL Rahul back. 

 

Can we get another VVS Laxman please :--D

No need Rahul sarfaraz can change the game quickly 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...