Rohit Sharma Out of Perth Test!

[raki05]

@Adamant bhai avoid using “misogynist” word, Agar New-Guy aa gaya toh thread ki aur hum sab ki lanka laga dega.

[gakgupta]

23 hours ago, singhvivek141 said:

Easwaran,
He is as Tamilian as Shreyas Iyer. Born and brought up in Dehradun, playing for Bengal.

Sai sudarshan was good in SA

[Adamant]

2 hours ago, rollingstoned said:

 

 

Poor Rohit sharmas wife, who made the choice to be his wife because it was a higher status option than whatever non-existent career she may or may not have had, it's not like she would have married him if he was some journeyman ranji cricketer or some deadbeat loser out of love. She didn't do him or anyone else any favors because she married a world class batsman who is also the Indian captain in all formats something that undoubtedly trumps anything else she might have had going on. That's just the honest truth of it regardless of any insincere and brainlet hand wringing around 'muh misogyny' which tries to obscure and pretend that such simple truths are not easily grasped because they seem politically incorrect for loser white knights. It wouldn't have happened if he kept missing important matches for personal reasons to be with her for sure.|
 

This paragraph sums up both your aukaad and your understanding, which private college did you graduate from? Amity?

Non existent career, lol. You think of females as gold digger, did you even research what she was doing. As is the case always with misogynist losers like you, you think a lady giving up on her career just because it earns lesser than her husband is not a sacrifice but you are plain and simple wrong. You ever heard the independence, didn't she know that dumb*s like you will come and make remarks on her? and how she is gold digging? Lets leave her case bcoz you think that her profession was not worth enough, what about Anushka who was already a A grade actress and was doing multiple movies every year, why is it on her to take care of the children and stay with them and not Kohli, abe gadhe apni soch badal, angrezi seekh li lekin aukaad bihari chhapri wali hi rahegi. 

Idiots like you think that family is not a man's responsibility just by the virtue of being a male, get rid of your fake masculinity. Go ask Sharma and kohli if they think whether their wives have done a favour to them by becoming a homemaker, their answer is the one I will respect not yours, neither are you successful and nor intelligent.

 

 

2 hours ago, rollingstoned said:

The observation around Sharma was more that he has missed a lot of overseas tests in recent years which seemed convenient, not always for the same reasons as Kohli.

Abe chutiye, apart from BGT in 2020, which other overseas tour has kohli missed, the reason that retards like you visit this forum is bcoz you will get similar dumb*s here who will support your narrative. Moreover Who the * has stopped your *ing bcci from dropping them, why is your board sucking their dicks? 
 

[Adamant]

2 hours ago, raki05 said:

@Adamant bhai avoid using “misogynist” word, Agar New-Guy aa gaya toh thread ki aur hum sab ki lanka laga dega.

I think a successful women sacrificing her career to become a home maker is something that is taken for granted here, will you ever do that if your other half goes on to earn a lot? 
People justify this by using age old cliches like its okay for a woman to be a homemaker, but I"ll tell you just try this

Remove the man > woman thought from your mind and think why would two person with equal rights and with successful career ever leave it, I cant even think about leaving my job even if my future wife earns millions. You work from age 4- age 28 to obtain a succesfull career (in your own right) and then leave it just because of age-old cliches.

[Adamant]

2 hours ago, raki05 said:

@Adamant bhai avoid using “misogynist” word, Agar New-Guy aa gaya toh thread ki aur hum sab ki lanka laga dega.

@New guy

[rollingstoned]

2 minutes ago, Adamant said:

This paragraph sums up both your aukaad and your understanding, which private college did you graduate from? Amity?

Non existent career, lol. You think of females as gold digger, did you even research what she was doing. As is the case always with misogynist losers like you, you think a lady giving up on her career just because it earns lesser than her husband is not a sacrifice but you are plain and simple wrong. You ever heard the independence, didn't she know that dumb*s like you will come and make remarks on her? and how she is gold digging? Lets leave her case bcoz you think that her profession was not worth enough, what about Anushka who was already a A grade actress and was doing multiple movies every year, why is it on her to take care of the children and stay with them and not Kohli, abe gadhe apni soch badal, angrezi seekh li lekin aukaad bihari chhapri wali hi rahegi. 

Idiots like you think that family is not a man's responsibility just by the virtue of being a male, get rid of your fake masculinity. Go ask Sharma and kohli if they think whether their wives have done a favour to them by becoming a homemaker, their answer is the one I will respect not yours, neither are you successful and nor intelligent.

Abe chutad who failed his correspondence degree from jhumri talaiya night college, read what i wrote properly and tell me where i mentioned 'gold digger'. It appears as though you're projecting again because you're too dumb to read and comprehend properly so hallucinate what you want to see.

 

And yes, she married him because of his success as a cricketer so what she did in her career doesn't matter and is a choice she consciously made by choosing to be a homemaker which is perfectly valid unless you're actually the misogynist here who thinks a woman should never have to do that and be dependent on her career to call herself 'independent' lol. It's not a 'sacrifice' if you're upgrading just like i didn't 'sacrifice' my old 1 bhk rental to move to a 4 bhk lol. Women wanting the men they marry to be more successful than them is a fact which doesn't make them gold diggers, all gold diggers want this but not all women who marry up and seek competent providers are gold diggers. It's not transitive but then again your puny brain will probably heat up too much from the effort needed to comprehend this. All the hyperventilating around 'muh independence' etc is just the usual hogwash which dimwits who don't understand what they're talking about feel the need to spout just to sound intellectual and conscientious. 

 

Anushka was a mediocre actress who saw the writing on the wall and decided to marry like almost all Bollywood heroines who cross a certain age do which makes sense and did so with someone whose cricketing career is a damn sight more impressive than her acting career, she wouldn't have done it otherwise and there's nothing wrong with it. Women tend to be natural caregivers considering they carry & give birth along with being the nurturing gender and this is cited most conveniently to show what they sacrificed when it comes to custody and to try to play up the 'sacrifice' part which is also partly disingenuous because it makes the assumption that the man was never there or doesn't provide anything let alone why they chose to start a family with him in the first place yet it is eagerly lapped up by dunderheads who have an agenda to peddle around something they're too thick to understand. Now this doesn't mean that Kohli & men won't/can't change the diapers etc as i know the dumb* you are that's what you will conclude but there's a clear reason and a hierarchy of priorities on why some things are more important to that marriage than others but it's still important to recognize that. Nothing stops her from still acting/producing movies or webseries like she continues to do so but to make it sound like a choice happily made was a sacrifice foisted upon her is the kind of idiotic disingenuous BS that's become par for the course nowadays.

Jise dimag lagane ata nahi hai wo soch badalne ki nasihat ko apni pichwade mein hi dale to acha hai. Sare Kohli stans jaise tu bhi ek mandh buddi chapri hai ye pata hai, ye dusre pe dalne ki koshish mat kar. Bihari aur gadhe bhi tere muqable samajhdar hai, unki bishti mat kar.

 

Again don't put words in my mouth you imbecile, gold digger was the first one. A man's primary responsibility is to provide in this case an expectation of which comes about largely by virtue of him being a male so as long as he is doing that he is not 'abandoning' anyone or anything, if you weren't some cringe-ass gender equality cultist you would be able to see that. 

It is precisely my point that neither of them are doing a favor to them or each other by fulfilling their role but something that elementary and dumbed down also eludes you, doesn't matter what Kohli or Rohit themselves think so much so as what is.

37 minutes ago, Adamant said:

Abe chutiye, apart from BGT in 2020, which other overseas tour has kohli missed, the reason that retards like you visit this forum is bcoz you will get similar dumb*s here who will support your narrative. Moreover Who the * has stopped your *ing bcci from dropping them, why is your board sucking their dicks? 
 

Series and not just overseas series. There is a whole list of matches that he has missed, i am not going to dig it out now and recount each and every one of them, it's on record. Just because everyone hasn't suffered brain damage like you have from OTT slavish fanboyism doesn't mean they've fallen victim to some narrative or can't see what is plain. 

Agree on bcci, we have been asking them to not kowtow to them for some time now but the Kohli/Hitman luli suckers have a problem when it is mentioned. Maybe you should also tell them since you have so much experience to not suck their dicks so much at the expense of everything else.

[rollingstoned]

43 minutes ago, Adamant said:

I think a successful women sacrificing her career to become a home maker is something that is taken for granted here, will you ever do that if your other half goes on to earn a lot? 
People justify this by using age old cliches like its okay for a woman to be a homemaker, but I"ll tell you just try this

Remove the man > woman thought from your mind and think why would two person with equal rights and with successful career ever leave it, I cant even think about leaving my job even if my future wife earns millions. You work from age 4- age 28 to obtain a succesfull career (in your own right) and then leave it just because of age-old cliches.

One has the option to be a homemaker - itself demanding - the other doesn't and has a performance expectation so it's not equal to begin with. It's not an 'age old cliche' if it's rooted in common sense as a consequence of lived reality and evolution both cultural and biological.

People frequently hate their jobs and leave it so its not a question of why would anyone leave a high paying job when high powered CEOs take sabbaticals frequently. the issue is one of common goals and starting a family rather than just making money or increasing the no. of zeros in the bank account. Most women  - like a lot of men - themselves hate their jobs and use their jobs to seek to entice men who are earning even more than them btw meaning what you call as a 'sacrifice' is something they intended to do eventually. Else you're always welcome to a lifetime of a corporate wageslave who is single. 

A woman who earns millions marrying you is only a hypothetical which will never happen btw, happens too infrequently for it to be a meaningful benchmark from which to extrapolate from. She will naturally seek someone who earns multimillions. And yes there are exceptions but this doesn't' disprove why the rule exists or why they're not useful for drawing any conclusions.

Edited October 12, 2024 by rollingstoned

[R!TTER]

2 hours ago, Adamant said:

You work from age 4- age 28 to obtain a succesfull career (in your own right) and then leave it just because of age-old cliches.

Didn't realize BRat employed child labor. My condolences to the poor guy employing this level of mediocrity  

[Adamant]

23 hours ago, rollingstoned said:

Abe chutad who failed his correspondence degree from jhumri talaiya night college, read what i wrote properly and tell me where i mentioned 'gold digger'. It appears as though you're projecting again because you're too dumb to read and comprehend properly so hallucinate what you want to see.

 

And yes, she married him because of his success as a cricketer so what she did in her career doesn't matter and is a choice she consciously made by choosing to be a homemaker which is perfectly valid unless you're actually the misogynist here who thinks a woman should never have to do that and be dependent on her career to call herself 'independent' lol. It's not a 'sacrifice' if you're upgrading just like i didn't 'sacrifice' my old 1 bhk rental to move to a 4 bhk lol. Women wanting the men they marry to be more successful than them is a fact which doesn't make them gold diggers, all gold diggers want this but not all women who marry up and seek competent providers are gold diggers. It's not transitive but then again your puny brain will probably heat up too much from the effort needed to comprehend this. All the hyperventilating around 'muh independence' etc is just the usual hogwash which dimwits who don't understand what they're talking about feel the need to spout just to sound intellectual and conscientious. 

 

Anushka was a mediocre actress who saw the writing on the wall and decided to marry like almost all Bollywood heroines who cross a certain age do which makes sense and did so with someone whose cricketing career is a damn sight more impressive than her acting career, she wouldn't have done it otherwise and there's nothing wrong with it. Women tend to be natural caregivers considering they carry & give birth along with being the nurturing gender and this is cited most conveniently to show what they sacrificed when it comes to custody and to try to play up the 'sacrifice' part which is also partly disingenuous because it makes the assumption that the man was never there or doesn't provide anything let alone why they chose to start a family with him in the first place yet it is eagerly lapped up by dunderheads who have an agenda to peddle around something they're too thick to understand. Now this doesn't mean that Kohli & men won't/can't change the diapers etc as i know the dumb* you are that's what you will conclude but there's a clear reason and a hierarchy of priorities on why some things are more important to that marriage than others but it's still important to recognize that. Nothing stops her from still acting/producing movies or webseries like she continues to do so but to make it sound like a choice happily made was a sacrifice foisted upon her is the kind of idiotic disingenuous BS that's become par for the course nowadays.

Jise dimag lagane ata nahi hai wo soch badalne ki nasihat ko apni pichwade mein hi dale to acha hai. Sare Kohli stans jaise tu bhi ek mandh buddi chapri hai ye pata hai, ye dusre pe dalne ki koshish mat kar. Bihari aur gadhe bhi tere muqable samajhdar hai, unki bishti mat kar.

 

Again don't put words in my mouth you imbecile, gold digger was the first one. A man's primary responsibility is to provide in this case an expectation of which comes about largely by virtue of him being a male so as long as he is doing that he is not 'abandoning' anyone or anything, if you weren't some cringe-ass gender equality cultist you would be able to see that. 

It is precisely my point that neither of them are doing a favor to them or each other by fulfilling their role but something that elementary and dumbed down also eludes you, doesn't matter what Kohli or Rohit themselves think so much so as what is.

Series and not just overseas series. There is a whole list of matches that he has missed, i am not going to dig it out now and recount each and every one of them, it's on record. Just because everyone hasn't suffered brain damage like you have from OTT slavish fanboyism doesn't mean they've fallen victim to some narrative or can't see what is plain. 

Agree on bcci, we have been asking them to not kowtow to them for some time now but the Kohli/Hitman luli suckers have a problem when it is mentioned. Maybe you should also tell them since you have so much experience to not suck their dicks so much at the expense of everything else.

I know how to read between the lines you dumb*, you don’t have to spell it out for me to infer it.

 

This logical explanation that you are giving me is rooted in misogyny.

 

Baaki tumhari aukaad nahi hai kuch ukhadne ki, these two guys will play on as much as they want while you pull out your pubic hairs.

 

Do kaudi ka gawar, jaahil, chal nikal.

[rollingstoned]

16 hours ago, Adamant said:

I know how to read between the lines you dumb*, you don’t have to spell it out for me to infer it.

 

This logical explanation that you are giving me is rooted in misogyny.

 

Baaki tumhari aukaad nahi hai kuch ukhadne ki, these two guys will play on as much as they want while you pull out your pubic hairs.

 

Do kaudi ka gawar, jaahil, chal nikal.

Haan wo dikh raha hai bsdk kitna 'between lines' tu read karta hai aur samajh pata hai isiliye itna bakwas hage ja raha hai tu tab se. 

 

'Explanations' that don't pander to contemporary fabulisms and orthodoxies don't become 'rooted in misogyny' because of your ignorance or lack of common sense. 

 

Aukad to tumhari bhi kuch hai nahi bajai yahan aake unki tarafdari karte hue muth marneki. Those who have Indian crickets well being in mind otoh will call a spade a spade when they treat it like their own private jagir so you can keep pulling your vaginal hairs out because it bothers you and you feel personally attacked. Glad to see at least that you ackowledge however indirectly that they are over staying their welcome. 

Unsophisticated and unlettered rubes trying to play the big man on the interwebz by projecting hard is old hat, take that advice and shove it where the sun doesn't shine. 

[Suhaan]

1 hour ago, rollingstoned said:

Haan wo dikh raha hai bsdk kitna 'between lines' tu read karta hai aur samajh pata hai isiliye itna bakwas hage ja raha hai tu tab se. 

 

'Explanations' that don't pander to contemporary fabulisms and orthodoxies don't become 'rooted in misogyny' because of your ignorance or lack of common sense. 

 

Aukad to tumhari bhi kuch hai nahi bajai yahan aake unki tarafdari karte hue muth marneki. Those who have Indian crickets well being in mind otoh will call a spade a spade when they treat it like their own private jagir so you can keep pulling your vaginal hairs out because it bothers you and you feel personally attacked. Glad to see at least that you ackowledge however indirectly that they are over staying their welcome. 

Unsophisticated and unlettered rubes trying to play the big man on the interwebz by projecting hard is old hat, take that advice and shove it where the sun doesn't shine. 

Lagta hai sriman ap Sri Shashi Tharoor ke tutor hain

Vocaboom aaphi se aaya hai

[Gollum]

4 hours ago, Suhaan said:

Lagta hai sriman ap Sri Shashi Tharoor ke tutor hain

Vocaboom aaphi se aaya hai

@rollingstoned is the Shakespeare of ICF, especially when he is angry/irritated. 

 

Don't want to be in his firing line, ever 

[Suhaan]

1 hour ago, Gollum said:

@rollingstoned is the Shakespeare of ICF, especially when he is angry/irritated. 

 

Don't want to be in his firing line, ever 

Arey arey

Aur sriman apka mai  Vishvanathan Anand Raso nahi bhul sakta

50-60 km lamba post tha wo

 

Apne shuru se lekar abtak ke posts jod dun toh bh ussey 100km kam hi niklega

[singhvivek141]

5 hours ago, Suhaan said:

Lagta hai sriman ap Sri Shashi Tharoor ke tutor hain

Vocaboom aaphi se aaya hai

Ye saare words save karlo bhai..
Dheere dheere ek ek karke chhodenge. Baat me "vazan" aa jayega. 

[gattaca]

On 10/12/2024 at 2:48 AM, raki05 said:

@Adamant bhai avoid using “misogynist” word, Agar New-Guy aa gaya toh thread ki aur hum sab ki lanka laga dega.

@New guy I remember there was a guy named India fan who said who would watch woman cricket and had to create a thread in padosi forum for women cricket may be new guy would like to have a word with him.

Edited October 14, 2024 by gattaca

[New guy]

2 hours ago, gattaca said:

@New guy I remember there was a guy named India fan who said who would watch woman cricket and had to create a thread in padosi forum for women cricket may be new guy would like to have a word with him.

Was it ne? I was banned there a longtime ago so don't remember if it was me or some other india fan

[New guy]

On 10/12/2024 at 12:18 PM, raki05 said:

@Adamant bhai avoid using “misogynist” word, Agar New-Guy aa gaya toh thread ki aur hum sab ki lanka laga dega.

Too late, like beetle juice, you have used the magic word three times to summon me

[Adamant]

On 10/14/2024 at 8:10 AM, rollingstoned said:

Haan wo dikh raha hai bsdk kitna 'between lines' tu read karta hai aur samajh pata hai isiliye itna bakwas hage ja raha hai tu tab se. 

 

'Explanations' that don't pander to contemporary fabulisms and orthodoxies don't become 'rooted in misogyny' because of your ignorance or lack of common sense. 

 

Aukad to tumhari bhi kuch hai nahi bajai yahan aake unki tarafdari karte hue muth marneki. Those who have Indian crickets well being in mind otoh will call a spade a spade when they treat it like their own private jagir so you can keep pulling your vaginal hairs out because it bothers you and you feel personally attacked. Glad to see at least that you ackowledge however indirectly that they are over staying their welcome. 

Unsophisticated and unlettered rubes trying to play the big man on the interwebz by projecting hard is old hat, take that advice and shove it where the sun doesn't shine. 

Oh you have Indian cricket well being in mind , then why the * do you have a problem with him skipping a test match, aren’t they the weakest links?

 

The real problem you have here is that you don’t have any aukaad to affect their selection or non selection, you are a grade B beta male who is hating on two others just because you will never compare to them.

 

Taking leave from one test match is as normal as it gets, Root Williamson have all done that , so you can shove your spade down your backside. As soonas you got an opportunity to show you deep rooted misogyny you excelled at displaying it.

 

Baaki tu misogynist hai tijhe pata nahi hai lekin tu hai.

 

Btw , your cricketing iq is also way below par, Kohli and Sharma will both score runs, anyone who has iota of a braincell will know that.

 

And I will be here quoting you and showing you your aukaad as and when it happens.

 

The fact that you started getting the itch as soon as a cricketer opted for rest for childbirth (one who has batted with injury in his hand) shows you are just another one of those filthy village idiots, aaap badh gaye soch vahin reh gayi.

[rollingstoned]

1 hour ago, Adamant said:

Oh you have Indian cricket well being in mind , then why the * do you have a problem with him skipping a test match, aren’t they the weakest links?

 

The real problem you have here is that you don’t have any aukaad to affect their selection or non selection, you are a grade B beta male who is hating on two others just because you will never compare to them.

 

Taking leave from one test match is as normal as it gets, Root Williamson have all done that , so you can shove your spade down your backside. As soonas you got an opportunity to show you deep rooted misogyny you excelled at displaying it.

 

Baaki tu misogynist hai tijhe pata nahi hai lekin tu hai.

 

Btw , your cricketing iq is also way below par, Kohli and Sharma will both score runs, anyone who has iota of a braincell will know that.

 

And I will be here quoting you and showing you your aukaad as and when it happens.

 

The fact that you started getting the itch as soon as a cricketer opted for rest for childbirth (one who has batted with injury in his hand) shows you are just another one of those filthy village idiots, aaap badh gaye soch vahin reh gayi.

Yes I do and would prefer if this arrangement was made a bit more permanent than just the odd test match or series here and there which they opt out of conveniently. Wouldn't have been hard to comprehend if you had 2 brain cells to rub together which would have actually allowed you to 'read between the lines'. 

 

None of us have any 'aukat ' in that sense as we are just armchair analysts with no real say in selections but the 'aukat' of a mindless Kohli-tard zombie is even lower. At any rate it's strange why this 'aukat' matters only if you say something these aforementioned tards don't like and start seething about, not otherwise. If you however have the pathetic near-subhuman existence whose whole raison d'etre is only to dickride them and discharge bodily fluids online then it's all dandy.

 Taking leave in one test match =\ taking leaves very frequently and conveniently over a not in-considerable period of time making it a pattern. When you're a hopeless retard you really should do yourself a favour and not compound it by indulging in sycophantic masturbation and coping by trying to make accusations based entirely off of ignorant hallucinations.

Kane gets panned here too btw incase you didn't notice so no double standard exists.  

 

 

Baki tujhe na 'misogynist' word ka pata hai aur na hi ye pata hai ki tu c***t ka dhakkan hai,bas lagta hai ki tujhe pata hai aur tu hai nai but tu hai. Mandhbuddi Chomu hai to hai kabool kar leta, cool dikhne ke chakkar mein hijda bhi confirm ho gaya. 

 

 

 

No my 'cricketing iq' is fine, just because you're a cognitively challenged imbecile with deep seated insecurities doesn't mean someone whose opinion doesn't sit well with you is 'low iq'. The stats over a period of time certainly validate that opinion re Kohli.

What you will do - and have been doing very regularly - is opportunistically show up when your poster girl gives you an opportunity to do so so you can make your semen discharge here and then disappear at other times which is quite often nowadays or just make irrelevant ad hominens in impotent rage. Isse teri aukat already pata hai, tu kya quote karke dusron ko eggspose karega be? Band gadhi bhi din mei 2 baar sahi waqt batati hai, usmein kya?  

 

 

 

I didn't get any 'itch', just felt it right to scratch the itch which you got and keep getting almost interminably so. I find village idiots to possess a damn sight more world-wisdom, character and common sense than someone like you does who seems to think a cricketer needs a whole month off for 'childbirth' so am not too keen on that fail of a smear which reflects more on you than them and find it 'rural-phobic' to say the least, to take a leaf out of your own book. If such a thing doesn't exist I argue it should especially when people have the freedom to imagine/invent every other micro aggression and use it to try and rhetorically undermine someone else in a move that belongs more in a playground just because they don't have a rational argument or valid counter rooted in any realism.

That 'village idiot' archetype fits you to a tee over here at least with your reputation, arrested in development and hopelessly infantilised yet still amusingly thinks someone else hasn't manage to keep pace with time or some such thing. 

 

 

 

 

[Adamant]

1 hour ago, rollingstoned said:

Yes I do and would prefer if this arrangement was made a bit more permanent than just the odd test match or series here and there which they opt out of conveniently. Wouldn't have been hard to comprehend if you had 2 brain cells to rub together which would have actually allowed you to 'read between the lines'. 

 

None of us have any 'aukat ' in that sense as we are just armchair analysts with no real say in selections but the 'aukat' of a mindless Kohli-tard zombie is even lower. At any rate it's strange why this 'aukat' matters only if you say something these aforementioned tards don't like and start seething about, not otherwise. If you however have the pathetic near-subhuman existence whose whole raison d'etre is only to dickride them and discharge bodily fluids online then it's all dandy.

 Taking leave in one test match =\ taking leaves very frequently and conveniently over a not in-considerable period of time making it a pattern. When you're a hopeless retard you really should do yourself a favour and not compound it by indulging in sycophantic masturbation and coping by trying to make accusations based entirely off of ignorant hallucinations.

Kane gets panned here too btw incase you didn't notice so no double standard exists.  

 

 

Baki tujhe na 'misogynist' word ka pata hai aur na hi ye pata hai ki tu c***t ka dhakkan hai,bas lagta hai ki tujhe pata hai aur tu hai nai but tu hai. Mandhbuddi Chomu hai to hai kabool kar leta, cool dikhne ke chakkar mein hijda bhi confirm ho gaya. 

 

 

 

No my 'cricketing iq' is fine, just because you're a cognitively challenged imbecile with deep seated insecurities doesn't mean someone whose opinion doesn't sit well with you is 'low iq'. The stats over a period of time certainly validate that opinion re Kohli.

What you will do - and have been doing very regularly - is opportunistically show up when your poster girl gives you an opportunity to do so so you can make your semen discharge here and then disappear at other times which is quite often nowadays or just make irrelevant ad hominens in impotent rage. Isse teri aukat already pata hai, tu kya quote karke dusron ko eggspose karega be? Band gadhi bhi din mei 2 baar sahi waqt batati hai, usmein kya?  

 

 

 

I didn't get any 'itch', just felt it right to scratch the itch which you got and keep getting almost interminably so. I find village idiots to possess a damn sight more world-wisdom, character and common sense than someone like you does who seems to think a cricketer needs a whole month off for 'childbirth' so am not too keen on that fail of a smear which reflects more on you than them and find it 'rural-phobic' to say the least, to take a leaf out of your own book. If such a thing doesn't exist I argue it should especially when people have the freedom to imagine/invent every other micro aggression and use it to try and rhetorically undermine someone else in a move that belongs more in a playground just because they don't have a rational argument or valid counter rooted in any realism.

That 'village idiot' archetype fits you to a tee over here at least with your reputation, arrested in development and hopelessly infantilised yet still amusingly thinks someone else hasn't manage to keep pace with time or some such thing. 

 

 

 

 

Nahi padha.

Too long

 

Answer this :

 

There’s nothing wrong in taking leave from a series because of child birth, if you can give me a simple rationale behind what’s wrong with my statement then I can actually accept that you are right. Which I am sure you cannot.

 

As of now its getting boring.

 

Edited October 15, 2024 by Adamant