Paging Kohli fanboy putrevus

[Ultimate_Game]

Please enlighten us how the bowlers and newbies let down the "King", and how if "King" Kohli had gotten the support, India would've swept NZ 3-0 

 

After all you were the one to take shots at Abhishek and newcomers who failed on their debut match in Zim. Surely you'll have something to say about 5 years of "no show" from the "King" when you couldn't tolerate one bad game from debutants 

Edited November 4, 2024 by Ultimate_Game

[Ultimate_Game]

Stat of the series for me:

 

174 runs - contribution of "Hitman" Rohit and "King" Kohli combined for the entire series.

 

What a way to showcase their "experience" 

[Adamant]

Responsibility of selectors now to drop them, they look done and dusted.

 

Passion and hunger is also not there.

[singhvivek141]

Practice game is also cancelled apparently.

Rohit and Kohli may not need it as they are "legends"...but some of the players are travelling for the very first time in Aus. Straight away in Perth can be a catastrophe for them.

[Majestic]

Ban cricket from India and ban this forum.

[Lord]

59 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said:

Stat of the series for me:

 

174 runs - contribution of "Hitman" Rohit and "King" Kohli combined for the entire series.

 

What a way to showcase their "experience" 

 

But but bowlers let us down. Look how batsmen chased this down

[sensible-indian]

1 hour ago, Ultimate_Game said:

Stat of the series for me:

 

174 runs - contribution of "Hitman" Rohit and "King" Kohli combined for the entire series.

 

What a way to showcase their "experience" 

That's  29 runs per innings for the 2 of them.

 

14 runs each.

 

lol.

 

We are 29/2 every innings.

Add Sarfru 0 (Except that 1 innings).

 

So 29/3.

 

Add Gill 25-30.

 

That's 60/4.

 

60/4 every innings.

 

Add to that no contribution from Ashwin and 2 pacers.

 

So that's 70/7.

 

Rest is Jaiswal, Pant, a bit of Jaddu & Sundar.

 

70/7 every damn innings.

 

Mark this down.

[Ultimate_Game]

6 hours ago, Lord said:

 

But but bowlers let us down. Look how batsmen chased this down

 

Haven't seen that fanboy @putrevus bag Indian bowlers and newbies yet. Obviously bowlers are at fault as giving the Indian batters a target of 140 odd is unacceptable! If bowlers had done their job they wouldn't have had to chase more than 50 

[Ultimate_Game]

7 hours ago, singhvivek141 said:

Practice game is also cancelled apparently.

Rohit and Kohli may not need it as they are "legends"...but some of the players are travelling for the very first time in Aus. Straight away in Perth can be a catastrophe for them.

 

If they play the practice game, they'll be overshadowed by likes of Sai Sudarshan, Paddikal, Jurel etc. So they took the easy option of canceling the match. Ifthey can have their say they would cancel the whole Aus series altogether and fast forward to IPL.

[New guy]

8 hours ago, Ultimate_Game said:

Stat of the series for me:

 

174 runs - contribution of "Hitman" Rohit and "King" Kohli combined for the entire series.

 

What a way to showcase their "experience" 

Meanwhile Pant alone = 261, he is the most run getter from BOTH sides.

[Ultimate_Game]

11 minutes ago, New guy said:

Meanwhile Pant alone = 261, he is the most run getter from BOTH sides.

 

Indian fortunes have depended on Pant, Jaiswal and lower order. Take out these two, you struggle to find anyone who shows up. "King" Kohli and "Hitman" Rohit have shown they can't even handle pressure in a mickey mouse league like IPL, so expecting them to perform in intls is asking for the moon.

 

Pity selectors don't have the balls to do the right thing and BCCI is run by nepo-baby like Jay Shah. That's why India will always underachieve in cricket as teams like Aus wouldn't have tolerated these performances without any repercussions. Shows you why one team wins tourneys while the other is reduced to making excuses like "30 bad mins", "one poor match", "one off game", "kabhi toh yeh chalta hai" etc.

[Suhaan]

4 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said:

 

Indian fortunes have depended on Pant, Jaiswal and lower order. Take out these two, you struggle to find anyone who shows up. "King" Kohli and "Hitman" Rohit have shown they can't even handle pressure in a mickey mouse league like IPL, so expecting them to perform in intls is asking for the moon.

 

Pity selectors don't have the balls to do the right thing and BCCI is run by nepo-baby like Jay Shah. That's why India will always underachieve in cricket as teams like Aus wouldn't have tolerated these performances without any repercussions. Shows you why one team wins tourneys while the other is reduced to making excuses like "30 bad mins", "one poor match", "one off game", "kabhi toh yeh chalta hai" etc.

Jaiswal's  struggle opened the floodgates for NZ against an already useless seniors poisened side

Gill too chose this time to simultaneously fail

Had the former fired like England,we would have swept NZ aside as well

That also means Kohli,who played in place of Jurel(England series hero),did zilch

Siraj is another did,who has taken his place for granted

[Lord]

30 minutes ago, New guy said:

Meanwhile Pant alone = 261, he is the most run getter from BOTH sides.

 

Would have been more if Kohli saab didn't run him out in Pune

[Sgattick10]

8 hours ago, Lord said:

 

But but bowlers let us down. Look how batsmen chased this down

Of course bowlers should have let our batsmen chase max 50-60 runs anything more and our superstars ****  their pants 

[Ultimate_Game]

2 hours ago, Suhaan said:

Jaiswal's  struggle opened the floodgates for NZ against an already useless seniors poisened side

Gill too chose this time to simultaneously fail

Had the former fired like England,we would have swept NZ aside as well

That also means Kohli,who played in place of Jurel(England series hero),did zilch

Siraj is another did,who has taken his place for granted

 

Replace Kohli with Jurel and Siraj with Axar and we win the series. This is as much on selectors and team management as it's on the players.

[test fan]

Both Rohit and Kohli are need to dropped from the Indian test team .

[Ultimate_Game]

5 minutes ago, test fan said:

Both Rohit and Kohli are need to dropped from the Indian test team .

 

You're 5 years too late. Plus they need to be dropped across all formats, not just the Tests. They're done.

[Suhaan]

1 hour ago, Ultimate_Game said:

 

Replace Kohli with Jurel and Siraj with Axar and we win the series. This is as much on selectors and team management as it's on the players.

Celebrating, worshipping and putting these clowns in the name of "king" on pedastals and depriving the next lot of its opportunities,which is all organic/law of nature calls for humiliation

Apt treatment by mid tier side NZ that too at home

Our shuppastars won't be even able to whitewash Zimbabwe,but allowed NZ of all SENA sides to shytewash them in front of their own people

[Ultimate_Game]

2 hours ago, Suhaan said:

Celebrating, worshipping and putting these clowns in the name of "king" on pedastals and depriving the next lot of its opportunities,which is all organic/law of nature calls for humiliation

Apt treatment by mid tier side NZ that too at home

Our shuppastars won't be even able to whitewash Zimbabwe,but allowed NZ of all SENA sides to shytewash them in front of their own people

 

And these parasites (Kohli, Rohit) got into the team when they were teenagers or around 20. They were persisted with when they struggled in their initial years. And now when the shoe's on the other foot, they're denying the current gen players like Rinku, Sai, Jurel, Padikkal, Sarfaraz etc. opportunities which they themselves received. Height of selfishness and shows their true selfish nature.

[BacktoCricaddict]

2 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said:

 

And these parasites (Kohli, Rohit) got into the team when they were teenagers or around 20. They were persisted with when they struggled in their initial years. And now when the shoe's on the other foot, they're denying the current gen players like Rinku, Sai, Jurel, Padikkal, Sarfaraz etc. opportunities which they themselves received. Height of selfishness and shows their true selfish nature.

Exactly. At least in the Indian context, most of our successful batsmen recently have debuted in their late teens/early twenties. Rarely do we see someone debut at age 26 and shine for 8-10 years. I am not sure why this is, but my sense is that our players get cooked in the domestic set up and get jaded pretty quickly once they hit 30.