Jump to content

Jurel should be WK batsman and Pant specialist batsman


Recommended Posts

Posted
45 minutes ago, R!TTER said:

I'd rather Jurel not play when the two *s at the top are still there; his output could be just as bad with them drowning the team!

 

Exactly you can play anyone and they won't do **** with these two stinking at the top and putting us under unreal pressure everytime.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

Exactly you can play anyone and they won't do **** with these two stinking at the top and putting us under unreal pressure everytime.

Agreed only reason we won against England because one of the idiot have missed entire series and we dint had to face two front enemies.

Posted
Just now, raki05 said:

Even axar… Axar is much better than any other batter not name Yashasvi and Pant.

 

yeah even Axar ahead of  Siraj would have been good.  Playing 2 pacers is dumb af from GG

Posted

There is a lot of fight in Axat which saved our ass many times in the past, and I dont see why GG dont want to give him a game...He was part of the main team under RD, now he is not getting a chance...Nothing against Sundar and he has done a good job...

Posted
9 minutes ago, raki05 said:

Agreed only reason we won against England because one of the idiot have missed entire series and we dint had to face two front enemies.

Enemies within :om:

spacer.png

Posted

Jurel in the XI is worth trying but why ask Pant to relinquish his keeping spot?

 

Pant is a natural keeper and is a must in the XI irrespective of who else plays. So I would say Pant should continue to keep, Jurel plays as a pure batsman, and can be potentially moved up and down the pecking order if other batsmen show better form

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...