Looks like we finally broke Bumrah :(

[Ultimate_Game]

What we were so afraid of finally seems to have happened. Make no mistake this is all on that doofus Rohit who continued to overbowl Bumrah while claiming "we're monitoring Bumrah's workload" 

 

Bumrah is the MVP who has kept India relevant, and if it's a serious injury it may very well hasten the end of Bumrah. Last time Bumrah was injured he was away for almost a year and now he's in his early 30s, it may be longer. If there's no Bumrah no point in even going to CT especially if Kohli and Rohit are going to be around. Plus it'll impact our defense of WT20 next year along with the only decent shot at WTC next cycle with Rohit and Kohli finally on the way out.

 

Wish that piece of shyte Rohit hadn't come to Aus at all 

[Vijy]

4 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said:

What we were so afraid of finally seems to have happened. Make no mistake this is all on that doofus Rohit who continued to overbowl Bumrah while claiming "we're monitoring Bumrah's workload" 

 

Bumrah is the MVP who has kept India relevant, and if it's a serious injury it may very well hasten the end of Bumrah. Last time Bumrah was injured he was away for almost a year and now he's in his early 30s, it may be longer. If there's no Bumrah no point in even going to CT especially if Kohli and Rohit are going to be around. Plus it'll impact our defense of WT20 next year along with the only decent shot at WTC next cycle with Rohit and Kohli finally on the way out.

 

Wish that piece of shyte Rohit hadn't come to Aus at all 

ICT broke Bumrah - perhaps. But his bowling action (specifically runup) is a bit of a menace to himself. Cummins bowled more overs per innings than Bumrah (remember our 2nd innings of Gabba virtually didn't happen), and he has been doing well.

 

Likely that Bumrah will retire from Tests in a couple of yrs from now.

Edited January 4, 2025 by Vijy

[Ultimate_Game]

Just now, Vijy said:

ICT broke Bumrah - perhaps. But his bowling action (specifically runup) is a bit of a menace to himself. Cummins bowled more overs per innings than Bumrah (remember our 2nd innings of Gabba virtually didn't happen), and he has been doing well.

 

Likely that Bumrah will retire from Tests in a couple of yrs from now.

 

Nope it was overbowling in the last 2 Tests which did it. He should only be used for short, sharp spells. Rohit used Bumrah as a stock bowler to the point that Bumrah himself had to say he couldn't do it. He had bowled around 145 overs till the 4th Test which was highest of any bowler from either side.

 

This is on Rohit. No two ways about it and I wish he gives up on Tests so he can have a shot at a couple of ICC tourneys and last till WC2027.

[Vijy]

3 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said:

 

Nope it was overbowling in the last 2 Tests which did it. He should only be used for short, sharp spells. Rohit used Bumrah as a stock bowler to the point that Bumrah himself had to say he couldn't do it. He had bowled around 145 overs till the 4th Test which was highest of any bowler from either side.

 

This is on Rohit. No two ways about it and I wish he gives up on Tests so he can have a shot at a couple of ICC tourneys and last till WC2027.

that could happen very soon.

[Ultimate_Game]

Just now, Vijy said:

that could happen very soon.

 

Hope he does that to extend his intl career else these bozos will kill him.

[rkt.india]

Bowling 20-22 overs per inning is not over-bowling. 

[Manucrick]

Thank you rohit

Since nz series fatso over bowling him 

[Vijy]

1 minute ago, Ultimate_Game said:

 

Hope he does that to extend his intl career else these bozos will kill him.

he is not a stock bowler. wish we had a strike bowler that is also a stock bowler. Some notable Test teams had at least one - McG, Walsh, Hadlee, etc.

Edited January 4, 2025 by Vijy

[Ultimate_Game]

5 minutes ago, Vijy said:

he is not a stock bowler. wish we had a strike bowler that is also a stock bowler. Some notable Test teams had at least one - McG, Walsh, Hadlee, etc.

 

We had Sundar whom we didn't bowl at all. Lot of Bumrah overs should've been bowled by Sundar at MCG.

[Vijy]

2 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said:

 

We had Sundar whom we didn't bowl at all. Lot of Bumrah overs should've been bowled by Sundar at MCG.

it is a bit sad that our strike bowler cannot bowl 20-ish overs per innings on average, but it is what it is. Cannot expect for Aus-tier fitness from him. He is an Old Man with a Broken Back.

[SandeepMotta]

Really hope he is alright.

 

Greatest Indian cricketer along with the likes of Sachin, Gavaskar and Kapil dev.

Edited January 4, 2025 by SandeepMotta

[Nikhil_cric]

It's the logical outcome of Rohit "carefully" managing his workload. 

[Vijy]

19 minutes ago, Nikhil_cric said:

It's the logical outcome of Rohit "carefully" managing his workload. 

imagine what would happen if he was not "carefully" managed.

[Kothili]

.

Edited January 4, 2025 by Kothili

[Laaloo]

1 hour ago, rkt.india said:

Bowling 20-22 overs per inning is not over-bowling. 

It's not but bowling him for 9-10 spells in an inning is.

[express bowling]

In the 4th test, Bumrah was made to bowl throughout the innings without any rest by Rohit.

 

It was stupid, greedy and selfish from Captain Rohit. 

 

 

 

 

Edited January 4, 2025 by express bowling

[Vickydev]

2 hours ago, rkt.india said:

Bowling 20-22 overs per inning is not over-bowling. 

Maybe not the numbers of overs but the frequency of the overs might have led to this

[Vijy]

19 minutes ago, Laaloo said:

It's not but bowling him for 9-10 spells in an inning is.

it was pretty stupid. same/less no. of overs with more spacing would have been better.

[adi B]

2 hours ago, rkt.india said:

Bowling 20-22 overs per inning is not over-bowling. 

It definitely ain't overbowling but it's the way the captain bowls him those 20-22 overs 

If one bowls 20-22 over with gaps ,it's ok ,but when he has to come back to bowl in every other spell ,it creates a problem.

[adi B]

1 hour ago, Laaloo said:

It's not but bowling him for 9-10 spells in an inning is.

This.