Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Brahmpautra is under our control. Not China. yarlung-tsangpo, aka brahmaputra in tibet, accounts for only 15% of total average flow of brahmpautra. the rest 85% come from river tributary catchement in arunachal pradesh and bhutan.  Look at google earth if you dont believe me and see the average width of yarlung tsango at the Namchi Barwa gorge and just 20km downstream after it passes the himalayan catchement zone : it literally fattens up like a yankee fatty 5 years after kindergarten.

 

We dont give a **** about Chinese dam, except for its ability to flood us, thats why we are building another to provide buffer in said case.

No one in indian gormint is worried about muh brahmaputra water due to above simple hydrological reality.

I guess you don’t understand the meaning of upstream.

Posted
1 minute ago, Teengunalagaan said:

Has anyone considered, if China messes with water what happens to Bangladesh ? They would be f*cked.

We are dealing with muslims here.

Remember muslim logic : i am willing to cut my leg off, if i can use it to beat the idolator dead.

Bangladeshs dont give a **** they will be *ed. They will celebrate today that hindu assam is flooded and then go to jannah tomorrow when flood-water arrives.

bengalis come in two shades usually - hindu or muslim. The hindu bong is a bit too educated and intellectual for his own good, the bong muslim is literal dirt eating dehati.

one is too smart for his own good, the other is literally the dumbest group in the entire indian subcontinent.

Posted

There is already a intetnal water dispute between Sindh and Punjab provinces of Pakistan over the Cholistan canal project. Much related to Indus River.

Posted
1 minute ago, putrevus said:

I guess you don’t understand the meaning of upstream.

?????
Upstream isnt kaalaa jadoo. Upstream matters if you control the catchement area too.
This is why pakistan shits bricks about india diverting the punjab rivers : coz we control the catchement. meaning all the water the river ever gains comes from land in India.

This is also why we dont give a **** about brahmapautra and china - because the MAJORITY of brahmaputra catchement area is Arunachal Pradesh - the land immediate south of the Tibet-Arunachal border generates 85% of the water volume on brahmaputra.

So china can jump up and down as upstream all it wants. it amounts to squat.

Posted
1 minute ago, Muloghonto said:

We are dealing with muslims here.

Remember muslim logic : i am willing to cut my leg off, if i can use it to beat the idolator dead.

Bangladeshs dont give a **** they will be *ed. They will celebrate today that hindu assam is flooded and then go to jannah tomorrow when flood-water arrives.

bengalis come in two shades usually - hindu or muslim. The hindu bong is a bit too educated and intellectual for his own good, the bong muslim is literal dirt eating dehati.

one is too smart for his own good, the other is literally the dumbest group in the entire indian subcontinent.

Bangladeshis are not the point, f*ck them. The point is it will trigger a huge humanitarian crisis, as Bangladesh is ridiculously prone to disasters. Why would China even want that on it's hands, when they are dealing with sh*t loads of problems of their own.. including economic challenges. For Pakistan ? what have ever gained from Pakistan, losses from BRI ?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

Invited Arshad Nadeem along with other world athletes to his event on May 24. The invitation was sent before the attacks 

Moronic social media warriors. We had such morons here on ICF also whining about Kohli laughing with Pakistan players after losing CT  finals in 2017.

 

I don’t see anything wrong in sending an invite even today. What did that guy Nadeem do wrong.


 

 

Posted
Just now, Teengunalagaan said:

Bangladeshis are not the point, f*ck them. The point is it will trigger a huge humanitarian crisis, as Bangladesh is ridiculously prone to disasters. Why would China even want that on it's hands, when they are dealing with sh*t loads of problems of their own.. including economic challenges. For Pakistan ? what have ever gained from Pakistan, losses from BRI ?

Because its perfect humanitarian crisis for china - it doesnt get direct blowback. No matter what, refugees fleeing natural catastrophe - be it in assam or dhaka- wont cross into tibet for shelter.

So it will never be their problem, except on the diplomatic front.And they got veto to negate 90% of it.

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Muloghonto said:

Because its perfect humanitarian crisis for china - it doesnt get direct blowback. No matter what, refugees fleeing natural catastrophe - be it in assam or dhaka- wont cross into tibet for shelter.

So it will never be their problem, except on the diplomatic front.And they got veto to negate 90% of it.

 

Anyways, India barely 15% of water, it won't be India, it will be Kanglus who will get F*cked.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Teengunalagaan said:

Anyways, India barely 15% of water, it won't be India, it will be Kanglus who will get F*cked.

No, it will be nobody who's *ed.

INDIA controls 85% of the water on brahmaputra. So if there is a dam in India and that gets blown up or fails or does *eries, THATS when downstream whoever - be it assam or bdland- that suffers flood.

China can do whatever it wishes with brahmaputra-tsangpo in tibet. for every 6 drop of brahmaputra water in digboi, remember, ony 1 drop comes from tibet. So we dont give a **** even if china diverts the whole yarlung tsangpo to xinjiang.

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Teengunalagaan said:

She isnt a fraud at all.
She is indo-american woman who is CHRISTIAN. who CHOSE to be christian before being politically active.

So she is living up to her tribe loyalty to savage desert demon cult of abraham of the desert.

 

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

And why is he disclosing all that to public for Pakistanis to read? Chup chaap karna..

Listen to AIM, at 4:50 mark, is this the approach India can build more infrastructure ?

 

Edited by Teengunalagaan
Posted
10 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

And why is he disclosing all that to public for Pakistanis to read? Chup chaap karna..

Need some Air defence system around Baglihar Dam asap.

Posted
59 minutes ago, putrevus said:

I understand your sentiment but that is very unfair to paint all of them with same brush.

 

It is also naive to think all hindus are desh bhakts.Kerala is suprising given their history.

 

We cannot bring Madarsa under govt control that is not going to happen.

I understand what you're saying.

Indeed there are good Muslims and bad Hindus as well.

 

But Hindus arent afraid of showing their protest against their fellow Hindus if they do something wrong.

Unfortunately, "Good Muslims" don't do that. They either keep mum...or just say that "those folks arent true Muslims" and escape the confrontation....there are very less folks who call spade a spade...and we all have seen how the "majority muslims" treat them. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

I understand what you're saying.

Indeed there are good Muslims and bad Hindus as well.

 

But Hindus arent afraid of showing their protest against their fellow Hindus if they do something wrong.

Unfortunately, "Good Muslims" don't do that. They either keep mum...or just say that "those folks arent true Muslims" and escape the confrontation....there are very less folks who call spade a spade...and we all have seen how the "majority muslims" treat them. 

 

Not the case this time

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...