Jump to content

Not to keep harping on Gabba 2020-21, but look at the bowling attack there


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Siraj

Natarajan

Sundar

Thakur

Saini

 

Not exactly world-beaters, but at that time, they were young and hungry with a TM that backed them.

 

Thakur has regressed and aged. Kamboj, with his showing over the past 2 yrs, could've been groomed for this role but was not. Or Reddy, who has already shown his batting mettle.

 

The blueprint is there - all it takes is clear definition of roles and proper mentorship. You don't need multiple Bumrahs. 

 

Same thing with Rana and others for the other roles. Once there is a group of guys established in the team, selectors are reluctant to prepare the next generation and rotate them in when necessary. 

Edited by BacktoCricaddict
Posted
27 minutes ago, Number said:

I think it was all about maximising the potential of every bowler. They even threw a relatively new ball to Sundar who got us Smith's wicket. Because they understood he is better with the new ball.

I think that series derailed Smith for a good 2-3 years. He was averaging 63 that time. In the ODI series before that he scored 2 60 ball 100s, back to back. 

 

Ashwin vs Smith starting from 2020 IPL till SCG was absolute cinema. 

Posted
5 hours ago, rkt.india said:

Fluke happens. 9/10 times, Australia will smash that bowling attack to pieces.

Yep,I don't rate that win since Windies also won on that same track last year.

Posted
19 hours ago, BacktoCricaddict said:

Siraj

Natarajan

Sundar

Thakur

Saini

 

Not exactly world-beaters, but at that time, they were young and hungry with a TM that backed them.

 

Thakur has regressed and aged. Kamboj, with his showing over the past 2 yrs, could've been groomed for this role but was not. Or Reddy, who has already shown his batting mettle.

 

The blueprint is there - all it takes is clear definition of roles and proper mentorship. You don't need multiple Bumrahs. 

 

Same thing with Rana and others for the other roles. Once there is a group of guys established in the team, selectors are reluctant to prepare the next generation and rotate them in when necessary. 

That is the problem.Gabba was once in a life time event.So assuming it to be a regular occurance is wrong.

 

Reddy has shown no such mettle with ball.His bowling is not even passable and will be hammered on these flat pitches.

 

Aussies are playing same set of bowlers for more than decade in all formats.It is not easy to find world class bowlers.

 

 

Posted
43 minutes ago, Adamant said:

 

 

That attack will be beaten to death most of the times.

As was the current one last week. The point is that we need a disciplined, motivated group of bowlers. Not old ones who are past their prime (Siraj, Krishna - if he ever had a prime).

Posted
54 minutes ago, Adamant said:

Fluke.

 

That attack will be beaten to death most of the times.

 

Almost all test wins can be considered as fluke. INdia did not win one test. THey won 2 tests. drew one with relatively understrength team. Let us give some credit to resource management by a make shift captain. You cannot fluke wins in Australia unless it becomes a bowling shoot out like Windies vs Australia happened. Those were good hard tracks where there were no demons. 

Posted
1 hour ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Almost all test wins can be considered as fluke. INdia did not win one test. THey won 2 tests. drew one with relatively understrength team. Let us give some credit to resource management by a make shift captain. You cannot fluke wins in Australia unless it becomes a bowling shoot out like Windies vs Australia happened. Those were good hard tracks where there were no demons. 

I am not saying that the series victory was fluke, just that the performance of Natarajan etc in gabba was a fluke.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Adamant said:

I am not saying that the series victory was fluke, just that the performance of Natarajan etc in gabba was a fluke.

They didn't do anything extraordinary. They just bowled to field. That's all they did unlike siraj was spraying from ball 1 here. We have been crap for a while outside Bumrah. NZ series thoroughly exposed us. Australia further exposed.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Adamant said:

I am not saying that the series victory was fluke, just that the performance of Natarajan etc in gabba was a fluke.

Kohli hota toh tumhara tone shayarana hota

 

Posted
41 minutes ago, Suhaan said:

Kohli hota toh tumhara tone shayarana hota

 

Wish he had missed out on some of the crucial matches like WTC finals, 5th test .

Posted

If we had chased, we would have won this test, simple as that. It was a wicket which got flatter and flatter. And in BGT we chased on one last test. If Australia had chased there, they would have won

 

With such pitches it becomes a 4th innings shootout with chasing team having advantage.

Posted
1 hour ago, New guy said:

If we had chased, we would have won this test, simple as that. It was a wicket which got flatter and flatter. And in BGT we chased on one last test. If Australia had chased there, they would have won

 

With such pitches it becomes a 4th innings shootout with chasing team having advantage.

Despite all the issues when was the last India crossed 350 in both innings of a test. It was way back in 2009 against Srilanka.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...