Jump to content

Indian cricket team without Bumrah


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, vayuu1 said:

May be with bumrah the bowlers feel sense of relaxation and complacency while without him team lift themselves up and fight as a unit 

In this match it was the batsmen who flopped. But yes it's a strange statistic. If it was a true team game like football then you could drop him but bowling and batting are individual endeavours.

 

Even when Bumrah isnt taking wickets he puts so much pressure on batsmen that they attack the other bowlers and get out.

Posted

Bumrah needs to play the next test, I know he did well in first innings but still we expected more.

 

TBH, the initial over of third innings was such a let down, all 11 players were sledging Crawley and Bumrah didn’t even bowl a single threatening ball.

 

He needs to pick more wickets with the new ball.

Posted
1 hour ago, Adamant said:

Bumrah needs to play the next test, I know he did well in first innings but still we expected more.

 

TBH, the initial over of third innings was such a let down, all 11 players were sledging Crawley and Bumrah didn’t even bowl a single threatening ball.

 

He needs to pick more wickets with the new ball.

 

He was the opposite. He got them on the knuckles a few times. T hey were uber uncomfortable against Bumrah and he was unlucky not to take a few more wickets.  At the end of the day we bowled them out for 194 runs everyone contributing it. It is a bowling unit. When one doesn't show up other takes up the mantle. That is why ENgland operated. Carse took 2. Then stokes, Then archer. Woakes 1. eventually Bashir.

Posted
3 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

He was the opposite. He got them on the knuckles a few times. T hey were uber uncomfortable against Bumrah and he was unlucky not to take a few more wickets.  At the end of the day we bowled them out for 194 runs everyone contributing it. It is a bowling unit. When one doesn't show up other takes up the mantle. That is why ENgland operated. Carse took 2. Then stokes, Then archer. Woakes 1. eventually Bashir.

I was specifically talking about the first over , the only over we bowled on day 3.

Posted

People used to say the same thing about Tendulkar or even Gavaskar.....

 

They score a century but India loses - and there was a chorus supporting this.

 

Well now the same is happening to a bowler - Bumrah gets 5 wkts but India loses ....

Posted

India’s likely playing XI for the 4th Test against England: Yashasvi Jaiswal, KL Rahul, Sai Sudharsan, Shubman Gill (C), Ravindra Jadeja, Dhruv Jurel (WK), Nitish Kumar Reddy, Washington Sundar, Arshdeep Singh, Akash Deep, Mohammed Siraj

Posted

When Bumrah bowls , the batsmen have their antennae up and focus from the first ball. When he doesn't there are a few loose shots .

 

Bumrah can bowl after the first 6 overs maybe

Posted

Good. We may have a chance of winning like 2nd test! :giggle:

 

I understand his body will not cooperate, but if he is going to have to pick and choose and not be available for the team on a regular basis, it is best he retires from test cricket and focus on white ball only. Or TM takes him out of test contention and just plan without him so we can build a bowling team for the future without Bumrah. It will be hard, but better to plan that way.

Posted
57 minutes ago, sage said:

Imagine if we win now

 

Fresh legs and well rounded attack with variety is far more likely to win India the test than a set of defensive bowlers+Bumrah as has been the strategy in other tests. Bumrah not playing is absolutely the right call - he looked tired even in the last test after a recovery period of 9 days.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...