Jump to content

Unless Kashmir issue is solved, Mumbai-like attacks always a possibility: Imran Khan

Sarkar

By Sarkar
in Chit Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

Lurker Newbie

Lurker

Posted
Posted

What has always confused me a little bit is why does India, and Indian media, keep putting Imran in a spotlight? Hardly a week passes when we do not have some interview of this guy on a random channel. He gets invited to World Economic Forum held in Gurgaon?? Why? How come I never hear any other else Pakistani politician being invited? Whats with our (retarded) love affair with this moron?

SLICKR392 Newbie

SLICKR392

Posted
Posted

He made a horrible and foolish statement. " We condemn 26/11 but we have blasts/attacks every day in Pakistan. We have 26/11 everyday in Pakistan " Is he that stupid to differentiate between a blast in Pakistan done by their own people & and an attack as huge as 26/11 done by them to us? By his talks it seems like the blasts in Pak doesn't seem like an unusual rather a normal thing in Pakistan but its different here. Noob :facepalm:

Nova Newbie

Nova

Posted
Posted
It's easier to say that now - can you post relevant excerpts of your posts where you have been actually against this on ICF or any other forum when the trades were taking place? This is not targeted at you but it looks like a lot of people wake up when there's a cricket series being scheduled (Vijay could be an exception though). Otherwise, they are back in their slumber with their merry lives and are least bothered about it. So essentially what happens is - Most people have Sifar knowledge of what is going around on socio-economic fronts throughout the year but the moment a sporting tie is scheduled you come up all in arms. In addition, since you want to be consistent on this please also make us clear that we should have not played them in the semi-final of the World Cup and conceded the match - consistency. Forget trade, I have not seen most people even comment when there were hockey matches scheduled. This for me is inconsistency and hypocrisy. It also shows how we behave like a nation - everything gains traction and slowly dies out. As I have said earlier, cutting off ties does not make anyone feel safe. Terrorists would not stop attacking because socio-economic ties have been cut off. The problem has to be closed from both ends - raising up of internal security and political pressure. Currently, all I can see is that people want the typical Indian jugaad - political pressure to be done. Why? Well, it's easier to do than lay down the actual ground work.
Good post.
Clarke Mentor

Clarke

Posted
Posted
wise words
So we should expect some of your countrymen to kill our citizens because in your opinion this third nation called Kashmir is not independent ?
BeautifulGame Newbie

BeautifulGame

Posted
Posted

Why are everyone so surprised? Imran Khan always supported terrorists.He even supports terrorists who kills people of his own country and religion.So why is everyone surprised he supports terrorists who involved in Mumbai. This is what he said about Afgan Taliban

Khan told reporters that insurgents in Afghanistan were fighting a "jihad". Citing a verse from the Qur'an, he said: "It is very clear that whoever is fighting for their freedom is fighting a jihad "The people who are fighting in Afghanistan against the foreign occupation are fighting a jihad,"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/oct/14/imran-khan-taliban-afghanistan-islam Or terrorists who kill his own people
‘We have local affiliates and supporters. Sure I can give big statements against the Taliban but that would make them [supporters] Taliban targets.”
Never understood why our media paint him as some sort of secularist.He is probably the politician most closest to Hafeez Saeed in idoelogical terms.
SLICKR392 Newbie

SLICKR392

Posted
Posted
Dhamki de rahe ho? Kashmir ke bad phir Punjab mangoge' date=' phir Jammu aur phir aur[/quote'] chor deh. Let them bark. They never come up with an explanation to their illogical comments.
maniac Grand Master

maniac

Posted
Posted

I always maintained that Imaran khan despite being a great cricketer always came across as a snake in the grass kind of personality..... I remember during the Prasad-Shoail incident in 1996,when one moment he was praising Sohail for his agression and then the next moment criticising him.... That may not be a benchmark of forming an opinion but a lot of Lahori Logic we see from our padosis definetely is a reflection of some of Imran's thoughts.Definetely agree with Lurker here The guy is a hypocrite of the first order-can see that from his personal life.. He was a good captain and definetely had a good cricketing accumen but does it really translate into capability of running the country? He will do more harm to pak's international standing(if that still exists) than the current Gvot and that is saying a lot.

vvvslaxman Grand Master

vvvslaxman

Posted
Posted
I always maintained that Imaran khan despite being a great cricketer always came across as a snake in the grass kind of personality..... I remember during the Prasad-Shoail incident in 1996,when one moment he was praising Sohail for his agression and then the next moment criticising him.... That may not be a benchmark of forming an opinion but a lot of Lahori Logic we see from our padosis definetely is a reflection of some of Imran's thoughts.Definetely agree with Lurker here The guy is a hypocrite of the first order-can see that from his personal life.. He was a good captain and definetely had a good cricketing accumen but does it really translate into capability of running the country? He will do more harm to pak's international standing(if that still exists) than the current Gvot and that is saying a lot.
He is the slimiest creature from pakistan i know. He has proved that so many times with anti India remarks.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...