Jump to content

Speeds and Performances of Pacers and Spinners


Recommended Posts

Pitch is very flat. Batsmen are supposed to score runs here.

 

We should not be disappointed with our bowlers who have been wicket taking in most conditions in the last 4 years.

 

It is actually a mystery how our batsmen got dismissed for 78 on this pitch !!!!  We should have scored 478.

 

 

 

 

Edited by express bowling
Link to comment
26 minutes ago, express bowling said:

Pitch is very flat. Batsmen are supposed to score runs here.

 

We should not be disappointed with our bowlers who have been wicket taking in most conditions in the last 4 years.

 

It is actually a mystery how our batsmen got dismissed for 78 on this pitch !!!!  We should have scored 478.

 

 

 

 

Ball swung more than first two tests. It had both swing and seam. 

Link to comment
5 hours ago, express bowling said:

Pitch is very flat. Batsmen are supposed to score runs here.

 

We should not be disappointed with our bowlers who have been wicket taking in most conditions in the last 4 years.

 

It is actually a mystery how our batsmen got dismissed for 78 on this pitch !!!!  We should have scored 478.

 

 

 

 

with this batting lineup, it's a miracle they scored 78. given how s**te the middle order is, they should have folded for <50.

Link to comment

This game again shows the greatness of Bumrah where he wasn't able get wickets, still didn't concede lot of runs unlike other three seamers all proving expensive. Bumrah is that quintessential test bowler. This is what test cricket is all about. Not letting opposition getting away by tight bowling even if you are not getting lot of help from the pitch or quick wickets. 

Edited by rkt.india
Link to comment
1 minute ago, rkt.india said:

This game again shows the greatness of Bumrah where he wasn't able get wickets, still didn't concede lot of runs unlike other three seamers all proving expensive. Bumrah is that quintessential test bowler. This is what test cricket is all about. Not letting opposition getting away by tight bowling even if you are not getting lot of help from the pitch or quick wickets. 

 

Superb post !!

Link to comment
1 hour ago, rkt.india said:

This game again shows the greatness of Bumrah where he wasn't able get wickets, still didn't concede lot of runs unlike other three seamers all proving expensive. Bumrah is that quintessential test bowler. This is what test cricket is all about. Not letting opposition getting away by tight bowling even if you are not getting lot of help from the pitch or quick wickets. 

dude booms is better than waqar and almost on par with wasim in terms of potential and ability. Already helped india win several matches overseas. he is unbelievable. just playing under a demented captain.

Edited by Jay
Link to comment
On 8/27/2021 at 7:47 AM, Jay said:

dude booms is better than waqar and almost on par with wasim in terms of potential and ability. Already helped india win several matches overseas. he is unbelievable. just playing under a demented captain.

If you gave him bottletops and non-neutral umpires, he would do even better

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Gollum said:

Quicks must be damn tired by now, not just physically but mental burden of carrying this useless batting unit for so long. 

 

Won't be a bad idea to rest a couple of them and bring back Thakur/Ashwin. Ishant definitely has to be benched, maybe one out of Siraj/Shami as well. 

 

Good that we have an extra 1.5 days rest. 

when we lose the next test in 3-4 days by gifting the wickets to Moeen and GoldenArm (i.e., Root), we can get some more rest. and Rat can spout off more about his "template" and "process".

Link to comment
38 minutes ago, Mosher said:

Prasidh could have played today but Umesh gets in just because of his "experience" inspite of not having performed well overseas.

 

 

Prasidh was added to the main squad before this test too.

 

But Kohli lacks the balls to try an inexperienced player when an oldie is still available.

 

He is so afraid to experiment even when an experienced player is an ineffective one.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...