Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I thought most of the teams would be filled with south Asian expats. Surprised to see so many kabaddi players native to their countries.

Argentina

argentina-1439232008-800.jpg

Sierra Leone

sierra-leone-1439231983-800.jpg

Denmark

denmark-1439231932-800.jpg

Not really surprising imo.

Unlike cricket which is requires lot of skill Kabaddi needs just physical ability to start playing .

Probably another reason why cricket will never catch on in too many countries .

Posted
On 9/14/2016 at 3:59 PM, Texy said:

5k0t3xU.png

On 9/15/2016 at 1:28 PM, Vilander said:

looks better represented than cricket lol

 

Hell, yeah!

 

There is Asia, Australia, Africa, Europe, North America and South America

Posted (edited)
On 17/09/2016 at 4:30 PM, Singh bling said:

What   a shame that a proper sport like kabbadi is not even in olympics because white men don't like it.

Or maybe not as well marketed as other sports. Majority of olympic sport games were invented either by Romans or British, hence lack of presence of desi sports like kho-kho and kabaddi.

 

 

Edited by MechEng
Posted
On 18/09/2016 at 7:54 AM, BeautifulGame said:

Not really surprising imo.

Unlike cricket which is requires lot of skill Kabaddi needs just physical ability to start playing .

Probably another reason why cricket will never catch on in too many countries .

That's exactly the reason why kabaddi is more like a sport while cricket is a game. Cricket needs more mental ability, it's basically a game of chess played on a physical level.

Posted

I think kabaddi if marketed properly has every chance of being highly popular in lot of countries,

It's less physical,

Easy to play,

Requires stamina

A very short time,

Requires tactics too ,

A fast paced game.

Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk

Posted
1 hour ago, vayuu1 said:

I think kabaddi if marketed properly has every chance of being highly popular in lot of countries,

It's less physical,

Easy to play,

Requires stamina

A very short time,

Requires tactics too ,

A fast paced game.

Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk

Dont know what you mean by 'less physical' coz Its THE most risky sport  in the world. Rugby, boxing, wrestling etc. are risk free in comparison.

Posted
Dont know what you mean by 'less physical' coz Its THE most risky sport  in the world. Rugby, boxing, wrestling etc. are risk free in comparison.

Nah, compared to rugby, boxing, wrestling and mna, where we see plenty of dangerous tackles,moves, punches, throws, kabaddi is less violent.

Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk

Posted
4 hours ago, vayuu1 said:

Nah, compared to rugby, boxing, wrestling and mna, where we see plenty of dangerous tackles,moves, punches, throws, kabaddi is less violent.

Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk

The reason u don't see very big no.of injuries in kabaddi is because the players are very tough, fit , professional and experienced.

 

Believe me If normal people do the kind of tackles or raids, they will get injured very very bad. Such kinds of injuries that they will avoid playing kabaddi for life. 

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, vayuu1 said:

Nah, compared to rugby, boxing, wrestling and mna, where we see plenty of dangerous tackles,moves, punches, throws, kabaddi is less violent.

Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk

If teens play Kabaddi, There will be fights all time. Any other age group, I think its not rough enough to loose cool.

 

4 hours ago, vayuu1 said:

Nah, compared to rugby, boxing, wrestling and mna, where we see plenty of dangerous tackles,moves, punches, throws, kabaddi is less violent.

Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk

Its because the time of allowed contact is very little. Also,  Max you can do is attempt to  twisit arm or knee but by that time, Referee blows whistle.

Edited by mishra
Posted
5 hours ago, vayuu1 said:

Nah, compared to rugby, boxing, wrestling and mna, where we see plenty of dangerous tackles,moves, punches, throws, kabaddi is less violent.

Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk

you added mna but think you ment mma. 

 

MMA and Wrestling are full contact combat sports.

 

Rugby is on level with Kabaddi but may be has more pace in terms of folks running around outdoors on a big field, so tackles can potentially be more forceful

 

Boxing is a class of its own, restricted contact yet a combat sport.

Posted

Olympics is a joke...it's all about european sports being highlighted as superior to the world. Asian sports are ignored like many other things. 

Posted
8 hours ago, Texy said:

Olympics is a joke...it's all about european sports being highlighted as superior to the world. Asian sports are ignored like many other things. 

Olympics became a joke the day Synchronized Swimming was introduced as a sport. The 2020 Olympic agenda actually even calls for moving it away from a "Sports" based program to an "Event" based program.

Posted
44 minutes ago, Crookbond said:

They don't - this is StarSports paying to have teams from across the world to make it popular.

Whats the problem with that? :hmmm: 

Posted
On 10/21/2016 at 0:40 PM, MechEng said:

Or maybe not as well marketed as other sports. Majority of olympic sport games were invented either by Romans or British, hence lack of presence of desi sports like kho-kho and kabaddi.

 

 

Judo is already part of Olympics and Karate will be in 2020 and none of them were invented by Romans or Britishers. 

×
×
  • Create New...