Sajid_Rana Posted October 26, 2016 Posted October 26, 2016 On 10/25/2016 at 0:56 PM, gs said: This Kab sudhroge? Jab tum Kashmir choro gay
mishra Posted October 26, 2016 Posted October 26, 2016 27 minutes ago, Sajid_Rana said: Jab tum Kashmir choro gay Matlab,kabhi Nahi Sudharoge
sandeep Posted October 26, 2016 Posted October 26, 2016 3 hours ago, sarchasm said: A moderately stable Pak would stir shit in both India and Afghan. So no, we need Pakistan completely embroiled internally and with its neighbors, and spend beyond its means on defence at the expense of wholesome economic and social progress. This would accelerate its eventual balkanization. That's just vengeful thinking. A balkanized Pakistan would be bad for us now. Maybe it could have worked 50 years ago, before they got nukes. Now its best if that $hithole keeps its $hit together. Else it will just make everything $hitty.
mishra Posted October 26, 2016 Posted October 26, 2016 2 hours ago, sandeep said: That's just vengeful thinking. A balkanized Pakistan would be bad for us now. Maybe it could have worked 50 years ago, before they got nukes. Now its best if that $hithole keeps its $hit together. Else it will just make everything $hitty. . When Pakstani establishment was strong, we had bomb blast fromHyderabad to Mumbai delhi. Now they are in trouble diplomatically , we have milder attacks , and that too once six month.
zen Posted October 26, 2016 Posted October 26, 2016 3 hours ago, Sajid_Rana said: Jab tum Kashmir choro gay It is Pak that occupies Kashmir illegally velu 1
mishra Posted October 26, 2016 Posted October 26, 2016 10 minutes ago, zen said: It is Pak that occupies Kashmir illegally But that is UN, india and rest of worlds view. Pakistanis see thing differently velu 1
Muloghonto Posted October 26, 2016 Posted October 26, 2016 4 hours ago, Sajid_Rana said: Jab tum Kashmir choro gay To jab gayerkanooni se dusro ka mulkh dakhal karoge or woh mulk 'chor dengey', tab sudhrogey...Chor kabhi chori me kamyaab hoke chori karna nahi chorte. Aaj tere jaise jaahil kashmir chori karna chahte haye, kal tere jaise jaahil punjab bhi chori karengey.
velu Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 On 10/25/2016 at 10:24 PM, Sajid_Rana said: RIP. Sad to see innocent Pakistanis paying the price for fighting someone else war. you are not fighting someone else war .. you are paying the price for sleeping with others for money and aid .. first US and then now with china mishra 1
Deucalion Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 Some Good comments i have read from many Indian news sites- "Diwali say pahlay Diwali" Now thats very Intresting comments.
zen Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 47 minutes ago, Deucalion said: Some Good comments i have read from many Indian news sites- "Diwali say pahlay Diwali" Now thats very Intresting comments. I guess that is for surgical strikes .... more to come if Pak cannot learn
sandeep Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 37 minutes ago, Deucalion said: Some Good comments i have read from many Indian news sites- "Diwali say pahlay Diwali" Now thats very Intresting comments. That's unfortunate, but its the result of 30 years of attacks in India by terrorists from Pakistan. That is what has led to such statements. In absence of Pakistan doing the right thing and going after all terrorists, there is a degree of satisfaction when Pakistan gets a taste of its own medicine. Sad thing is regular people pay the price for their government's crimes.
zen Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 12 minutes ago, sandeep said: That's unfortunate, but its the result of 30 years of attacks in India by terrorists from Pakistan. That is what has led to such statements. In absence of Pakistan doing the right thing and going after all terrorists, there is a degree of satisfaction when Pakistan gets a taste of its own medicine. Sad thing is regular people pay the price for their government's crimes. I guess that the comments were related to surgical strikes. And if that is the case, there is nothing wrong with such comments
jalebi_bhai Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 Those talking about the balkanization of Pakjab, not going to happen in the next couple of years. For now, Pakjab serves as a buffer zone to any immitent threat from ISIS or other terror organizations west of India. There is a massive turf war going on in Pakjab between the Army/ISI and TTP/South Punjab based jehadis. A good 1/4 of the Pakjabi army is deployed in the Swat Valley and FATA. In short, their goose is already getting cooked. Except for Slumabad, Pakjab is just a massive war zone with a heavily armed civilian population. Their economy is in doldrums and their political leadership counts for very little. It's a waiting game really, so the Indian Army won't want to unnecessarily escalate matters. There is no need to, for now. The forced disintegration of Pakjab will result in a massive civil war. It will be an even bigger cluster-phuck than the Partition was. Jehadis, uniformed or non-uniformed, running wild. Unquestionably, there will be a refugee crisis. We can't do a Bangladesh in Balochistan because the situation, militarily, is quite different. There are parallels, in the way how the Pakjabi army are ethnically cleansing the Baloch, but a different military strategy will be required. For starters, unlike Bangladesh, Balochistan is contiguous with Pakjab. If Pakjab has to disintegrate, it would have to happen organically. Eventually, either the uniformed or the non-uniformed Jihadis will prevail. They will cancel each other out and after that, India will step in. Make no mistake, this is India's mess to clean, even though it was the Brits-US who made it. sandeep, WC2011INDIA, gs and 3 others 6
Detonator Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 Sad incident. RIP victims. But "gunmen"? Interesting choice. Are they good terrorist or bad terrorist?
Recommended Posts