Jump to content

Over to Vizag.What changes to be made?


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The only question is who bolsters the lower middle order:

- Gambhir (play him in lower middle for tackling spinners, he can still play spin right?)

- H. Pandya

- Karun Nair

- Jayant Yadav (lower order, NOT lower middle)

- none of the above??

 

 

Edited by fineleg
Posted

Goes to show how poor domestic cricket in India is given how many modes of dismissals Gambhir's new technique opens up, he is still able to score bucket loads.

 

Ranji bowlers simply lack the skill and discipline to expose batsmen's weaknesses. Which is why all these people on here going gaga about youngsters like Pant need to open their eyes to the gap between domestic and international cricket. 

Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, WeStMiDz said:

Goes to show how poor domestic cricket in India is given how many modes of dismissals Gambhir's new technique opens up, he is still able to score bucket loads.

 

Ranji bowlers simply lack the skill and discipline to expose batsmen's weaknesses. Which is why all these people on here going gaga about youngsters like Pant need to open their eyes to the gap between domestic and international cricket. 

He hasnt scored "bucket loads" at all, one first class 100 in the last 2/3 years , that too against a weak odisha team. Even this year he got destroyed by Sreenath Arvind and Mithun.

Edited by Bleed-Blue
Posted
12 minutes ago, WeStMiDz said:

Goes to show how poor domestic cricket in India is given how many modes of dismissals Gambhir's new technique opens up, he is still able to score bucket loads.

 

Ranji bowlers simply lack the skill and discipline to expose batsmen's weaknesses. Which is why all these people on here going gaga about youngsters like Pant need to open their eyes to the gap between domestic and international cricket. 

He has one ton since 2013. That's hardly scoring a bucket of runs. He was averaging around 37 before the call up.

Posted (edited)
On 11/14/2016 at 9:21 PM, Vilander said:

why would you replace Umesh with hardik dude.

For extra depth in batting and it's gonna be a turner where spinners will be crucial.Hardik fits in who can be our support bowler as a seamer plus bats too.

Edited by ShebbySB
Posted (edited)

Rahul is all set to play in the second test confirmed by Kumble today.So probably this is the

team for 2nd test:-

Rahul,Vijay,Pujara,Kohli,Rahane,Hardik/Nair,Ashwin,Saha,Jadeja,Mishra/Jayant,Shami.

9 of the players marked in bold are certain to play.

Edited by ShebbySB
Posted
3 minutes ago, ShebbySB said:

Rahul is all set to play in the second test confirmed by Kumble today.So probably this is the

team for 2nd test:-

Rahul,Vijay,Pujara,Kohli,Rahane,Hardik/Nair,Ashwin,Saha,Jadeja,Mishra/Jayant,Shami.

9 of the players marked in bold are certain to play.

Agree with the 9, but Mishra and Umesh will be the other two retained. Only Gauti swapped out for KL

Posted
44 minutes ago, WeStMiDz said:

Goes to show how poor domestic cricket in India is given how many modes of dismissals Gambhir's new technique opens up, he is still able to score bucket loads.

 

Ranji bowlers simply lack the skill and discipline to expose batsmen's weaknesses. Which is why all these people on here going gaga about youngsters like Pant need to open their eyes to the gap between domestic and international cricket. 

Have you seen his record this season? The guy has scored ~800 runs at an average of 114, SR of 113 and hit 44 sixes. He is far ahead of anyone else which is all you can ask a 20-year-old to do to prove himself. Can you give any other example of an Indian batsman in the recent past scoring as many runs at both an average and SR of more than 100? 

Posted
55 minutes ago, WeStMiDz said:

Ranji bowlers simply lack the skill and discipline to expose batsmen's weaknesses. Which is why all these people on here going gaga about youngsters like Pant need to open their eyes to the gap between domestic and international cricket. 

Pant was clobbering bowlers of "International class" in the IPL. He's a ridiculous talent and probably the reason why a team like DD(who's managed by the excellent Dravid) shelled out so much amount for him. Now that I think of it, DD has Iyer, Samson, Pant and Nair. I'm betting all four will be regular in the next three years or so in one format or another.

Posted
24 minutes ago, ShebbySB said:

Rahul is all set to play in the second test confirmed by Kumble today.So probably this is the

team for 2nd test:-

Rahul,Vijay,Pujara,Kohli,Rahane,Hardik/Nair,Ashwin,Saha,Jadeja,Mishra/Jayant,Shami.

9 of the players marked in bold are certain to play.

They didnt confirm Rahul will play as the opener. They could slot him in at No.6. Gambhir could still be retained as opener in the XI. Batting looks a bit thin with 5 regular bats. Especially if its a turning pitch batting wouldnt be so easy and Eng spinners dont seem incompetent. I would look to go in with 6 batsmen. 2 spinners and 2 seamers should be the bowling attack.

Posted
1 hour ago, Unleashed said:

Pant was clobbering bowlers of "International class" in the IPL. He's a ridiculous talent and probably the reason why a team like DD(who's managed by the excellent Dravid) shelled out so much amount for him. Now that I think of it, DD has Iyer, Samson, Pant and Nair. I'm betting all four will be regular in the next three years or so in one format or another.

Saha had better IPL stats than Pant last year.  So think about that before getting too carried away.  

Posted (edited)

Not doubting Pant's talent or potential at all but no way should we thrust him into test cricket immediately as some have suggested on the basis of clobbering domestic attacks. The shorter format is where he first needs to get his opportunity. 

Edited by WeStMiDz
Posted
1 hour ago, kubrickian said:

They didnt confirm Rahul will play as the opener. They could slot him in at No.6. Gambhir could still be retained as opener in the XI. Batting looks a bit thin with 5 regular bats. Especially if its a turning pitch batting wouldnt be so easy and Eng spinners dont seem incompetent. I would look to go in with 6 batsmen. 2 spinners and 2 seamers should be the bowling attack.

Check cricinfo...Kumble quoted he will open along with vijay

Posted
1 hour ago, kubrickian said:

They didnt confirm Rahul will play as the opener. They could slot him in at No.6. Gambhir could still be retained as opener in the XI. Batting looks a bit thin with 5 regular bats. Especially if its a turning pitch batting wouldnt be so easy and Eng spinners dont seem incompetent. I would look to go in with 6 batsmen. 2 spinners and 2 seamers should be the bowling attack.

spinners and fielders failed last game, they need to fill those gaps. And Gambhir was the weak link in batting so makes sense to replace him with Rahul. 

Posted (edited)

Replace A with B, C with D, but what abt the white elephant in the room (catches)?

Catches win matches, there has been no news on fielding coach's comments (do we have one?), hope catching drills are on

Edited by fineleg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...