Jump to content

Fielding Statistics For England Series


Tibarn

Recommended Posts

Posted

Source of stats?  Very useful.  

 

Top teams don't have these kinds of shocking numbers.  This is a big area of improvement for us, along with Kohli's on-field tactics.  The latter will hopefully take care of itself over time - but the drops can easily be improved by 50 % or higher.  Just very, very poor. 

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, sandeep said:

Source of stats?  Very useful.  

 

Top teams don't have these kinds of shocking numbers.  This is a big area of improvement for us, along with Kohli's on-field tactics.  The latter will hopefully take care of itself over time - but the drops can easily be improved by 50 % or higher.  Just very, very poor. 

The drops and stumpings are via the espncricinfo commentary

Edited by Tibarn
Posted (edited)

Add to this the numerous catches that flew through or dropped in vacant spaces due to lack of conventional close-in field positions.

 

  • Like the edge off Stokes induced by Umesh  that flew through 2nd slip yesterday, with a 1st and a 3rd slip standing in a spread formation.
  • Many other such catches in this series off pacers
  • Numerous lobs to short leg with no-one there....off  both pacers and spinners.

 

 

 

Edited by express bowling
Posted
5 minutes ago, express bowling said:

Add to this the numerous catches that flew through or dropped in vacant spaces due to lack of conventional close-in field positions.

 

  • Like the edge off Stokes induced by Umesh  that flew through 2nd slip yesterday, with a 1st and a 3rd slip standing in a spread formation.
  • Many other such catches in this series off pacers
  • Numerous lobs to short leg with no-one there....of both pacers and spinners.

 

 

 

Thats where i am disappointed with kohli.He should just keep it simple .Findout how many slips he can afford and put them in sequence.

Posted
5 minutes ago, express bowling said:

Add to this the numerous catches that flew through or dropped in vacant spaces due to lack of conventional close-in field positions.

 

  • Like the edge off Stokes induced by Umesh  that flew through 2nd slip yesterday, with a 1st and a 3rd slip standing in a spread formation.
  • Many other such catches in this series off pacers
  • Numerous lobs to short leg with no-one there....of both pacers and spinners.

 

 

 

Yep. Virat should go back to placing traditional slip catching positions. The big gap between 1st slip and 3rd slip is not working.

Posted

Rahul dropped Butler as soon as he arrived in the 2nd innings. It was a difficult chance (there was some doubt if there was bat involved) ballooned from the pad. he had both hands but spilled because of the stretch. These are catch-able in FSL, Sillypoint.  

Posted
7 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

Rahul dropped Butler as soon as he arrived in the 2nd innings. It was a difficult chance (there was some doubt if there was bat involved) ballooned from the pad. he had both hands but spilled because of the stretch. These are catch-able in FSL, Sillypoint.  

Which Test? 

Posted
8 hours ago, express bowling said:

Add to this the numerous catches that flew through or dropped in vacant spaces due to lack of conventional close-in field positions.

 

  • Like the edge off Stokes induced by Umesh  that flew through 2nd slip yesterday, with a 1st and a 3rd slip standing in a spread formation.
  • Many other such catches in this series off pacers
  • Numerous lobs to short leg with no-one there....off  both pacers and spinners.

 

 

 

at some level Indian slip catchers and fielders at catching positions are not used to chance inducing 140 k fast bowling, that could be the only reason for 10 drops and such fielding position lapses, spinners mostly done in by WK.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...