Stradlater Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 It's time we got rid of this discriminatory clause within the Constitution. Let the court repeal it and flood the valley with Biharis and change the whole demography in a decade. Moochad, Gollum, beetle and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollum Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 Came across a shocking fact today about Art 35A. Quote It facilitates the free and unrestrained violation of fundamental rights of those workers and settlers like Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe people who have lived there for generations. The Valmikis who were brought to the state during 1957 were given Permanent Resident Certificates on the condition that they and their future generations could stay in the state only if they continued to be safai-karmacharis (scavengers). And even after six decades of service in the state, their children are safai-karmacharis and they have been denied the right to quit scavenging and choose any other profession. So members of Valmiki community have to continue in manual scavenging profession (irrespective of their qualifications) if they want to be granted PRC. How evil is this clause? How has this gone unnoticed till now? SC doesn't want to look into it? Jai MIM Jai Bhim lobby chup kyun hai? No liberal voices? No intellectuals willing to step forward and debate this atrocity on Dalits? WTF has GOI been doing all these years? How bereft of humanity are these Kashmiri SOBs? LINK 1 LINK 2 Vilander and beetle 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stradlater Posted August 6, 2018 Author Share Posted August 6, 2018 Just now, Gollum said: Came across a shocking fact today about Art 35A. So members of Valmiki community have to continue in manual scavenging profession (irrespective of their qualifications) if they want to be granted PRC. How evil is this clause? How has this gone unnoticed till now? SC doesn't want to look into it? Jai MIM Jai Bhim lobby chup kyun hai? No liberal voices? No intellectuals willing to step forward and debate this atrocity on Dalits? WTF has GOI been doing all these years? How bereft of humanity are these Kashmiri SOBs? LINK 1 LINK 2 Are Wah!!! Bolo Jai Bheem. BC all jokes aside how can such disgusting thing can continue to exist legally sanctioned by the state? Imagine if such thing happened in the mainland. Why no Dalit politician raise voice over this? Gollum 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollum Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 Imagine PRC bowing before Uyghurs like this ...no wonder both our countries have taken such divergent paths in the last 7 decades. Stradlater and chewy 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asterix Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 Imagine PRC bowing before Uyghurs like this ...no wonder both our countries have taken such divergent paths in the last 7 decades.Gift of Nehru-Sheikh keeps on giving... Stradlater, Jimmy Cliff and Gollum 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollum Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 (edited) Digressing for a moment but how is Shah Faesal still holding on to his job? Isn't he violating the AIS Conduct Rules on a continuous basis? Earlier gems Quote What All India Service (Conduct Rules) say “No member of the service shall, in any radio broadcast or communication over any public media or in any document published anonymously, pseudonymously or in his own name or in the name of any other person or in any communication to the press or in any public utterance, make any statement of fact or opinion... i. Which has the effect of an adverse criticism of any current or recent policy or action of the central government or a state government; or ii. Which is capable of embarrassing the relations between the central government and any state government; or iii. Which is capable of embarrassing the relations between the central government and the government of any foreign State: Provided that nothing in this rule shall apply to any statement made or views expressed by a member of the service in his official capacity and in the due performance of the duties assigned to him. LINK If you go through this IAS officer's twitter timeline you will find many digs at GOI. Edited August 6, 2018 by Gollum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stradlater Posted August 6, 2018 Author Share Posted August 6, 2018 5 minutes ago, Gollum said: Digressing for a moment but how is Shah Faesal still holding on to his job? Isn't he violating the AIS Conduct Rules on a continuous basis? Earlier gems LINK If you go through this IAS officer's twitter timeline you will find many digs at GOI. This guy has crossed all the limits. I have been following him for sometime and all he does spew more venom towards Indian state. @surajmal why aren't your chaddi wearing Patriots not issuing any fatwa on this guy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chewy Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 Repeal this Article It will provide opportunity to purge all those illegal Pakistanis who crossed into Kashmir claiming to be “indeginious” to the land Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 Yes, we need Kaka shops in J&K. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarke Posted August 8, 2018 Share Posted August 8, 2018 BJP seems to be upping the nationalist quotient for 2019 with this and the citizens registry in Assam. Not that this should a political thing, it should be the duty of any govt and better late than never. asterix 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollum Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 On 8/7/2018 at 1:31 AM, Gollum said: Digressing for a moment but how is Shah Faesal still holding on to his job? Isn't he violating the AIS Conduct Rules on a continuous basis? Earlier gems LINK If you go through this IAS officer's twitter timeline you will find many digs at GOI. On 8/7/2018 at 1:38 AM, Stradlater said: This guy has crossed all the limits. I have been following him for sometime and all he does spew more venom towards Indian state. @surajmal why aren't your chaddi wearing Patriots not issuing any fatwa on this guy? Chalo at least he isn't IAS any longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beetle Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 Shah Faesal ✔@shahfaesal I would compare Article 35A to a marriage-deed/nikahnama. You repeal it and the relationship is over. Nothing will remain to be discussed afterwards. 3,351 7:15 PM - Aug 5, 2018 Disgusting #@$%^&* Then he talks about discrimination. kamina! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beetle Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 It is disgusting that this exists! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilander Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 On 8/6/2018 at 3:39 PM, Stradlater said: mainland there is no mainland India and sildeland India wrt Kashmir. *ing Kashmiri will say that to false equate themselves to taiwan..scum are under us all are mainland only land Stradlater 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rageaddict Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 (edited) Even the Hindus and Sikhs in Jammu and Kashmir dont want the 35 A to be repealed. The State receives decent funding from the Centre, the locals have exclusive rights over all the Government Jobs and most private jobs in the State and are also free to Settle, Study ( have quotas for Children of displaced families in many Universities) and Work in different parts of the country . Tourists visiting Kashmir, Leh, Ladakh and Vaishnou Devi along with the heavy presence of Army personnel and their families provides an additional boost to the local economy. Moreover, just the mere thought of sharing the rights over land with the Biharis is scary. Life is good. Edited January 9, 2019 by rageaddict Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mishra Posted January 14, 2019 Share Posted January 14, 2019 (edited) ^ 1. Can you explain where did you get data that Jammu people are against/not Against article 35 A? 2. How repeal of article 35 A will only bring about Biharis to J&K and not anyone else? 3. What makes sharing land with Bihari's more scary then sharing it with pro Pakistani, radical Islamic people or terrorist? Edited January 14, 2019 by mishra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpeg.cbc9de0a87c379d8abc1722a5b43f003.jpeg)
Recommended Posts