goose Posted August 13, 2016 Share Posted August 13, 2016 Pakistan are very watchable indeed right now. Their team is bristling with talent, achievement, passion, debutantes, veterans, young and old. There's a story to tell with every player. Yes even the return of the spot fixer makes for an intriguing tale. For quite possibly the first time ever, today i was egging on Pakistan to stuff England more so than India against the Windies, and no it's not just because Eng are a bigger scalp than WI. The Pakistanis are a joy to watch right now. velu, Iconoclast, Asim and 3 others 6 Link to comment
f.b.m Posted August 14, 2016 Share Posted August 14, 2016 I think Misbah's captaincy makes it a likable team. There's a greater sense of unity in victory and defeat. velu 1 Link to comment
sandeep Posted August 14, 2016 Share Posted August 14, 2016 England Pakistan series has been more fun to watch because both are flawed teams who show flashes of quality coupled with drops and selection mistakes and a bunch of other strands. West Indies slow outfield and flat pitches make for dull cricket. velu 1 Link to comment
tweaker Posted August 14, 2016 Share Posted August 14, 2016 India vs Windies series has become more interesting because of the game played in the dressing room.The preference of Rohit over Pujara has added more spice.Lot of people are more interested in this matter instead of India winning the series in Windies velu, Switchblade, Lannister and 1 other 4 Link to comment
Brainfade Posted August 14, 2016 Share Posted August 14, 2016 It matters to fans of cricket. To me, cricket = Indian cricket. I cannot stand to watch Pak-Eng, Aus-SL, Zim-NZ or whatever else. And as long as the Indians are dominating their opponents, life is good! And right now, they are. Love it, mon. Link to comment
Bigg Brother Posted August 14, 2016 Share Posted August 14, 2016 Cricket in England is always pleasing to eye. SLICKR392, MechEng and Cricketfanatic 3 Link to comment
Singh bling Posted August 14, 2016 Share Posted August 14, 2016 Thanks to star sports , they killed the fun of entire series by not showing it on live on TV Link to comment
Bigg Brother Posted August 14, 2016 Share Posted August 14, 2016 Thanks to star sports , they killed the fun of entire series by not showing it on live on TV The 4th one is being televised. Link to comment
G_B_ Posted August 14, 2016 Share Posted August 14, 2016 Unfair The pitches of the Windies and lack of crowd make it feel like that... Not saying Pakistan are not watchable. Its just that you cannot compare England to Windies. sandeep 1 Link to comment
Singh bling Posted August 14, 2016 Share Posted August 14, 2016 23 minutes ago, Bigg Brother said: The 4th one is being televised. Where? I have 4 star sports non hd channels , but Eng vs pakistan is not on any Link to comment
Bigg Brother Posted August 14, 2016 Share Posted August 14, 2016 Where? I have 4 star sports non hd channels , but Eng vs pakistan is not on any SS4 hd on Airtel SS add on hd tata sky+ Dont know about others. Link to comment
goose Posted August 14, 2016 Author Share Posted August 14, 2016 Yasir Shah - leg-spinner with a beautiful action and attitude - 16 matches Wahab Riaz - left-arm pace cranks it up to 90 plus for match turning spells - 18 matches Mohammed Amir - exciting left-armer returning after 5 year ban/prison - 18 matches Sohail Khan - right-armer, bowls a heavy ball, two 5fers from - 4 matches Every facet of test match bowling one could hope to watch with a combined total of 56 matches. Then there's Ishant Sharma on 71 matches. Sure I want India to win but i'm more inclined to just look up the score nowadays. Lord 1 Link to comment
Singh bling Posted August 14, 2016 Share Posted August 14, 2016 7 hours ago, Bigg Brother said: SS4 hd on Airtel SS add on hd tata sky+ Dont know about others. I think even the 3rd one was also available on HD .Star sports just want to extract money from cricket fans and force them to subscribe HD boxes Link to comment
zep1706 Posted August 14, 2016 Share Posted August 14, 2016 I agree. I enjoyed watching them in this series. Link to comment
Captain Posted August 15, 2016 Share Posted August 15, 2016 I preferred to watch the Eng vs Pak series over Ind vs WI. The reasons being that Tests in England more often than not are very pleasing to the eye like someone already mentioned in this thread, the pitches tend to be pretty good and add to that a huge crowd. Comparing that to the slow and low pitches of WI with about 20 spectators in the stadium is unfair. Switch India and Pak i.e WI vs Pak and Eng vs IND and i'm pretty sure that India would be more watchable. It's more to do with the host nation rather than India or Pakistan. How on Earth is the Pakistani batting lineup watchable? On the other hand, their bowling even though with only 4 specialist bowlers was terrific to watch. Link to comment
CG Posted August 15, 2016 Share Posted August 15, 2016 Pakistan is one of the most defensive sides in the game.Batting is hardly watchable.Regarding bowling Pak was saved by Yasir Shah.Amir had a bad series .Wahab struggled also. adi B 1 Link to comment
Sachinism Posted August 15, 2016 Share Posted August 15, 2016 I think a large part of the pleasure is to do with where they're playing. Cricket in England always looks and feels better. Where as in WI games are usually ground out. Brainfade and CG 2 Link to comment
sandeep Posted August 16, 2016 Share Posted August 16, 2016 On 8/14/2016 at 7:54 AM, goose said: Yasir Shah - leg-spinner with a beautiful action and attitude - 16 matches Wahab Riaz - left-arm pace cranks it up to 90 plus for match turning spells - 18 matches Mohammed Amir - exciting left-armer returning after 5 year ban/prison - 18 matches Sohail Khan - right-armer, bowls a heavy ball, two 5fers from - 4 matches Every facet of test match bowling one could hope to watch with a combined total of 56 matches. Then there's Ishant Sharma on 71 matches. Sure I want India to win but i'm more inclined to just look up the score nowadays. I hear where you are coming from. But then Pak have always had a better stable of fast bowlers, not really news. Watchability is not really a function of a solo team - its the contest that is interesting or not. Test cricket in England is a great spectacle, enjoyable even in the worst case. I was there in 2011 during the 0-4 series, and as horrible as it was for an Indian fan, I enjoyed it. But there's a lot to check out with Team India. Have you watched Ashwin bowl in test matches recently? Might want to check it out. Very Ashwin - A spinner at the absolute top of his game, in control of his length, line, loop, drift, pace and turn. Has it on a string and can execute it to his wish. KL Rahul - Young developing opening bat with high quality skills and absolutely no fear. Rahane - Budding test great in the classic Bombay mould. Scores runs everywhere against all bowling attacks. Kohli - An ODI great with a slightly flawed test game who is eminently watchable because he takes the game on when he's at the crease. Bhuvi - Give him a bit of movement and watch the magic show. philcric and Brainfade 2 Link to comment
Brainfade Posted August 16, 2016 Share Posted August 16, 2016 44 minutes ago, sandeep said: I hear where you are coming from. But then Pak have always had a better stable of fast bowlers, not really news. Watchability is not really a function of a solo team - its the contest that is interesting or not. Test cricket in England is a great spectacle, enjoyable even in the worst case. I was there in 2011 during the 0-4 series, and as horrible as it was for an Indian fan, I enjoyed it. But there's a lot to check out with Team India. Have you watched Ashwin bowl in test matches recently? Might want to check it out. Very Ashwin - A spinner at the absolute top of his game, in control of his length, line, loop, drift, pace and turn. Has it on a string and can execute it to his wish. KL Rahul - Young developing opening bat with high quality skills and absolutely no fear. Rahane - Budding test great in the classic Bombay mould. Scores runs everywhere against all bowling attacks. Kohli - An ODI great with a slightly flawed test game who is eminently watchable because he takes the game on when he's at the crease. Bhuvi - Give him a bit of movement and watch the magic show. Not to mention Virat Kohli's aggressive, passionate captaincy. He is young and hungry, sets great expectations, is constantly making changes thinking about the next step, supporting his bowlers and leading from the front on fitness. Next, pretty much the whole team fields with dedication. Ashwin and the I. Sharma are not agile, and RGS is inconsistent on the field, but they all throw themselves at the ball. In Kannada, we called it "Biddu Biddu fielding maadthaanappa!" (Falling falling, he fields). I challenge you that Mohammed Shami's bowling is as much fun to watch as any Pakistani bowler. Ashwin's toughness while batting is wonderful to watch. Of all the players you listed, Ajinkya Rahane is at the top for me. Quiet, understated, disciplined with beautiful batting skills and lightning quickness and dedication on the field. I would challenge anyone to name one Pakistani fielder (or Australian for that matter) who surpasses Rahane in this department. I agree with the OP on one aspect - we don't have guys with "interesting" personal failings - drugs (Yasir), gambling (uknowwho) etc. From that point of view, yes, we are boring. And I like it that way. sandeep 1 Link to comment
Sooda Posted August 16, 2016 Share Posted August 16, 2016 Not just watchable, they are pretty good too. Shafiq and Azhar Ali are good players and hopefully Sami Aslam can keep going too.. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now