Jump to content

Has the game of cricket ever seen bigger home track bully than Pujara


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, WeStMiDz said:

Overreaction re Pujara on here at times. Yes his numbers don't stack up but he has seen off tough spells on a number of occasions. It's only his mindset abroad that is letting him down. He simply doesn't have the confidence to get the big runs as he does at home. 

You proved my point . He has many blind Bhakt now new theory has immersed his job is to blunt the new ball . So if it a was case we should play some tailender who is good at blunt the new ball and replace him some other batsman 

Link to comment
8 minutes ago, Forever Indian said:

Australia's ex 2nd best batsman David Warner is a bigger HTB, has 18 out of 21 centuries in Australia/SA and of the rest 3, two are in Bangladesh.

He may not have 100s but he has good innings last time they were in SL, when the whole team collapsed. 

 

http://googleweblight.com/i?u=http://m.cricbuzz.com/cricket-series/2438/australia-tour-of-sri-lanka-2016/matches&hl=en-IN

 

2nd and 3rd match especially

Edited by Rasgulla
Link to comment
9 minutes ago, MechEng said:

Name one batsman in India who plays spin better than Pujara?

 

Answer: None.

 

 

P.S.: Without Pujara, expect this batting line up to fold up for under 100 scores on big turners.

Agreed, that's the conundrum. Similar to how you can't play in subcontinent without Ashwin and Jadeja, you can't go without Pujara in subcontinent. The last two series in subcontinent where came from behind to win series (in SL and against Aus) were primarily bcos of Pujara and Rahul (in Australia series).

Link to comment
20 minutes ago, LORD_analyst said:

then only play him on turners,dimwit.

Us fans don't realize the luxury  of having a batsman as good as Pujara. 

 

Also he is a bit unlucky that he is playing in an era where the overall quality of fast bowling has improved compared to 2000s for every country barring maybe Pakistan. Sehwag and Laxman are lucky that they are not playing in the current era, because if they did then their overseas stats would take a big hit.

Link to comment
1 minute ago, Forever Indian said:

Could alternate Rahane and Pujara in subcontinent and outside.

Easier said than done. If we had 4 settled batsmen, we could rotate between Pujara and Rahane as the 5th batsman depending on whether we are playing in the sub-con or not. But right now, apart from Kohli and Vijay to an extent, nobody else is sure of their place in the side. I'd gave him the first 2-3 Tests in England. If he flops, then we need to move on from him for good outside the sub-con and give a long rope to someone like a Gill rather than replacing him with frauds like Dhawan and Rohit.

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Trichromatic said:

A Batsman Looses his form some times , I trust Pujara totally to Suceed.

 

Batting is a Practice Art( Since i Open), with Practice Art, i mean the more you practice , more you suceed.

if one is in good form , it makes a big difference, this form has some thing to do with mental make up, feet movement etc...if one is not in the right frame , he fails.

this guy is a PAIN for Bowlers and as soon as he gets his rhythm in england, he will Suceed big time unless he gets into the Zero Scoring mood.

what is BATTING?

Their are two style of Batting , one is the spontaneous Sehwag style in which the batsman sees the ball out from the hand and kinda gets into the Swing Mood and plays like Sehwag.

Second is the Sedate and Slow style Watch the ball Hit or touch your Bat and watch the ball till it hits you or u hit the ball, see the ball connecting to your bat....I follow the second Style Normally as most batsman bat in this style, first style is normally the style of batting that Bowlers do..kinda Slog Style of batting.

 

 

these top batsman are so very good in this Second style of batting that it becomes very very difficult to beat their EYES.

Link to comment
21 minutes ago, MechEng said:

Us fans don't realize the luxury  of having a batsman as good as Pujara. 

 

Also he is a bit unlucky that he is playing in an era where the overall quality of fast bowling has improved compared to 2000s for every country barring maybe Pakistan. Sehwag and Laxman are lucky that they are not playing in the current era, because if they did then their overseas stats would take a big hit.

gawwwd ....i repeat . then only play pujara at home just like jadeja.

Link to comment
39 minutes ago, Jimmy Cliff said:

Easier said than done. If we had 4 settled batsmen, we could rotate between Pujara and Rahane as the 5th batsman depending on whether we are playing in the sub-con or not. But right now, apart from Kohli and Vijay to an extent, nobody else is sure of their place in the side. I'd gave him the first 2-3 Tests in England. If he flops, then we need to move on from him for good outside the sub-con and give a long rope to someone like a Gill rather than replacing him with frauds like Dhawan and Rohit.

Agreed, I am not saying to drop him for Eng tour as we don't have any better options. But we do need to start grooming youngsters instead of recycling oldies and discards like Gambhir, Mukund, Dhawan, Rohit, Parthiv, etc which is what Kohli has been doing since he took over captaincy almost 4 years ago.

Edited by Forever Indian
Link to comment
On 6/20/2018 at 9:05 PM, WeStMiDz said:

Overreaction re Pujara on here at times. Yes his numbers don't stack up but he has seen off tough spells on a number of occasions. It's only his mindset abroad that is letting him down. He simply doesn't have the confidence to get the big runs as he does at home. 

He has been around for a while and if there is still no confidence in him to carry on after a start, then it's more to do with skills than confidence. 

Link to comment
15 minutes ago, SLICKR392 said:

He has been around for a while and if there is still no confidence in him to carry on after a start, then it's more to do with skills than confidence. 

This. If he doesn't find confidence after playing 55+ tests, how much time will he take? 80 tests? Players get those many matches in their entire career.

Link to comment

I had a soft spot for Pujara. Used to think he wasn't given the respect that he deserved by the team management.

However, the two run-outs in RSA and this disastrous season with Yorkshire has really turned me off.

 

I wouldn't be too shocked if he starts India-England series on the bench with KL taking his place at number 3.

However, if he does get make it into starting XI, he will have to treat each test innings as the most important test innings of his life. Couple more test failures and he may never get a chance to represent India again in any format of the game.

Edited by GolGappe
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...