zen Posted February 8, 2019 Posted February 8, 2019 esp. his batting in the "V" and sixes in that area Soorma_Bhopali and maniac 1 1
maniac Posted February 8, 2019 Posted February 8, 2019 (edited) 1 minute ago, zen said: esp. his batting in the "V" and sixes in that area Actually the way he unwinds and shuffled reminded me of some WI player. Thanks good catch Edited February 8, 2019 by maniac
King Tendulkar Posted February 8, 2019 Posted February 8, 2019 Not a T20 player, just lacks that bit of power No mug with bat but then all players coming in are decent. Its just seprating good players from the guns in selction
vvvslaxman Posted February 8, 2019 Posted February 8, 2019 Enough with hype guys lol He is a decent bat. He is not a slogger. Looks ungainly when he does that. Probably he could play as a ODI batsman in the long run. But how would you compare him with Manish Pandey? flamy and Tendulkar1996 1 1
Ankit_sharma03 Posted February 8, 2019 Posted February 8, 2019 Actually he reminds me of angelo mathews but shankar is way more classy
maniac Posted February 8, 2019 Posted February 8, 2019 3 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Enough with hype guys lol He is a decent bat. He is not a slogger. Looks ungainly when he does that. Probably he could play as a ODI batsman in the long run. But how would you compare him with Manish Pandey? Please no. Shankar has already shown a lot more range than that leg side cow lashing selfish hack
Ankit_sharma03 Posted February 8, 2019 Posted February 8, 2019 5 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Enough with hype guys lol He is a decent bat. He is not a slogger. Looks ungainly when he does that. Probably he could play as a ODI batsman in the long run. But how would you compare him with Manish Pandey? not only ODI but he ll be a gr8 option in test...have been saying for long have him n pandya both and use them acc to condition in test cricket Shanka is miles ahead in terms of quality then manish pandey
Ankit_sharma03 Posted February 8, 2019 Posted February 8, 2019 (edited) 1 minute ago, MultiB48 said: Has quite a bit of trigger movement.Maybe they misfires ,making him loses his shape every now and then . Pandey stays leg side of the ball whereas he gets in line .also has more power . also the ball angle of manish pandey's bat , the day it moves he ll be look damn ugly and shankar will give assurance Manish struggles like rahane against slow bowling, although better then rahane Edited February 8, 2019 by Ankit_sharma03
maniac Posted February 8, 2019 Posted February 8, 2019 1 minute ago, MultiB48 said: Has quite a bit of trigger movement.Maybe they misfires ,making him loses his shape every now and then . Pandey stays leg side of the ball whereas he gets in line .also has more power . @Ankit_sharma03 @Switchankit Your views?
maniac Posted February 8, 2019 Posted February 8, 2019 2 minutes ago, MultiB48 said: Has quite a bit of trigger movement.Maybe they misfires ,making him loses his shape every now and then . Pandey stays leg side of the ball whereas he gets in line .also has more power . He looks better with conventional shots than slogs or lofted shots.
Popular Post Ankit_sharma03 Posted February 8, 2019 Popular Post Posted February 8, 2019 Just now, maniac said: @Ankit_sharma03 @Switchankit Your views? shud i answer to u or @Global.Baba philcric, Laaloo, GolGappe and 7 others 10
zen Posted February 8, 2019 Author Posted February 8, 2019 2 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Enough with hype guys lol He is a decent bat. He is not a slogger. Looks ungainly when he does that. Probably he could play as a ODI batsman in the long run. But how would you compare him with Manish Pandey? Among those who debuted in the last 2-3 years, below is how I would rate them in terms of "potential" T1: Shaw (played in Ind though), Agarwal (looked like he belongs to this level in Aus), Pant (has pacing issues) and Hardik (amazing hitting potential. Could become 2nd most important wkt for Ind in LOIs) T2: Shankar, Gill (Good but some ingredient is still missing atm) T3: Krunal (weakness vs short ball but then even Dhawan has that), Vihari (a glorified nightwatchman) Pandey is good too in ODIs but he appears to play for his average at times nevada 1
Ankit_sharma03 Posted February 8, 2019 Posted February 8, 2019 Just now, maniac said: He looks better with conventional shots than slogs or lofted shots. he is even slogging well in PP, SRH shud think of using him at 3
Ankit_sharma03 Posted February 8, 2019 Posted February 8, 2019 1 minute ago, zen said: Among those who debuted in the last 2-3 years, below is how I would rate them in terms of "potential" T1: Shaw (played in Ind though), Agarwal (looked like he belongs to this level in Aus), Pant (has pacing issues) and Hardik (amazing hitting potential. Could become 2nd most important wkt for Ind in LOIs) T2: Shankar, Gill (Good but some ingredient is still missing atm) T3: Krunal (weakness vs short ball but then even Dhawan has that), Vihari (a glorified nightwatchman) Pandey is good too in ODIs but he appears to play for his average at times not only short pitch, krunal doesnt look comfortable against pace only....will have to improve rapidly velu and Real McCoy 2
vvvslaxman Posted February 8, 2019 Posted February 8, 2019 Knowing how TN players are known to go off the boil after initial promise i am going to keep the expectations low. They just don't have the drive , determination to succeed. At this point i would compare his batting with Ashwin who also bats somewhat like a specialist batsman. He has to go to the next level. Only way he can do is significantly increasing his bowling skills.
zen Posted February 8, 2019 Author Posted February 8, 2019 4 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Knowing how TN players are known to go off the boil after initial promise i am going to keep the expectations low. They just don't have the drive , determination to succeed. At this point i would compare his batting with Ashwin who also bats somewhat like a specialist batsman. He has to go to the next level. Only way he can do is significantly increasing his bowling skills. still in his early days. so let's see how he shapes up and makes use of the opportunities
vvvslaxman Posted February 8, 2019 Posted February 8, 2019 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Vilander said: Shankar is our Angelo Mathews. Actually Angelo bowls slower than him. But angelo does something with the ball. He seams away or in. So Shankar has to learn to do that instead of bowling gun barrel straight. Also Angelo is prepared to play longish knocks. In Shankar's defense he never had a chance. But he looks like he has the tools to succeed. Just he has to work twice as hard. This is a brittle middle order. He could own a spot for a while if he puts his mind to it. I am glad Rohit sharma gives him enough confidence by promoting up. Edited February 8, 2019 by vvvslaxman
King Tendulkar Posted February 8, 2019 Posted February 8, 2019 1 hour ago, MultiB48 said: Has quite a bit of trigger movement.Maybe they misfires ,making him loses his shape every now and then . Pandey stays leg side of the ball whereas he gets in line .also has more power . His trigger is fine. Back foot goes back and across and front foot goes forward and opens up a bit. Standing still and waiting for ball to be realsed is stuff of 1970s. Even Dhoni in last year does trigger but of course does it village with simple back and across but does it so vllage like when bowler starts his run up looool meant to do it just when bowler releases or when enters delivery stride Total modern techinque. To get in to pwer position, many modern batters use it. Gill is another one who has same trigger. Rohit uses it as well but his front foot goes to far across sometimes and hence gets done lbw in tests
philcric Posted February 8, 2019 Posted February 8, 2019 4 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: shud i answer to u or @Global.Baba
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now