Ambati Tirupathi Rayudu's career is unofficially over !!!

[nevada]

2 hours ago, speed_thrills said:

Hate this age discrimination mindset. If someone is good he should be in the team irrespective of age.

Yes. 28 is nothing. IIRC, Adam Gilchrist became a regular at 27-28, waiting on the sidelines for Healy to retire.

[velu]

53 minutes ago, maniac said:

Calling Mommy and maybe Grandma Ambati to cook some delicious authentic Andhra cuisine  

 

add some guntur red chilies  

[UrmiSinhaRay]

Sent from my SM-G610F using Tapatalk

[Pollack]

4 hours ago, OpeningBatsman said:

To be honest, I was really sceptical about Shankar's batting potential as a Ltd overs player, but boy Iam so glad to be proven wrong. 

Wish he was around 22-23... anyway, better late than never

He is not a hard hitting clean striker of the ball. But he is a solid batsman suitable for no 4. 

[speed_thrills]

18 hours ago, OpeningBatsman said:

Thats nt discrimination that's a fact.. A 22 year old can play much longer than a 28 year old.. Common sense... Where did i say shankar shouldn't be playing? It was just an observation . I'm a fan of his batting now.. 

Not a fact at all, it's being ageist and it's prevalent in all walks of life not only in sports. What gives a 22 years old will remain good enough till 28. We have so many instances of youngsta beauties not living up to initiate promise. 

[Ankit_sharma03]

17 hours ago, bowl_out said:

Doubt that.. If Rahul flunks another match, Rayudu might come back to the squad and Rahul will be left out for WC

not really , even if rahul fails he wud be considered as backup opener 

Rayudu chances are killed by emergance of shankar who is showing he can bat anywere 

[Real McCoy]

Biryani is...........DONE

[velu]

thank me now  

[sandeep]

I just hope you haven't pulled a Maniac move on paavam boy.

[wanted_desi]

He is really done. Squad of 15 would have no space for him. 

[Gollum]