Ankit_sharma03 Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 When Courtney Walsh refused to mankad Saleem Jaffar and it cost West Indies a place in the 1987 World Cup semi-final
zen Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 3 minutes ago, CG said: 4 minutes ago, zen said: As I said before, ppl can even justify terrorism using their “logic” .... As mentioned in the post, Ashwining, a conjob made to look like Mankading, is not the right thing to do. Do it properly when the batsman is actually out There is no proper way to do it, it's always premeditated. See the universal boss’s video for e.g
Sachinism Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 2 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: When Courtney Walsh refused to mankad Saleem Jaffar and it cost West Indies a place in the 1987 World Cup semi-final Courtney's a fool then.
mishra Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 In his autobiography, the Don wrote: For the life of me, I can't understand why questioned his sportsmanship. The laws of cricket make it quite clear that the non-striker must keep within his ground until the ball has been delivered. If not, why is the provision there which enables the bowler to run him out? By backing up too far or too early, the non-striker is very obviously gaining an unfair advantage. flamy, Suhaan and philcric 3
mishra Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 18 minutes ago, zen said: People are against Ashwining, a con job made to look like Mankading Therefore, there is no point in listing Mankading laws or implying that batsman could have been was out of his crease on the previous ball or whatever. In this case, he wasn’t, if Ashwin had bowled normally Let’s not get into conjectures on original Mankading You sure watching the same thing. Dont make up stuff
zen Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 1 minute ago, mishra said: In his autobiography, the Don wrote: For the life of me, I can't understand why questioned his sportsmanship. The laws of cricket make it quite clear that the non-striker must keep within his ground until the ball has been delivered. If not, why is the provision there which enables the bowler to run him out? By backing up too far or too early, the non-striker is very obviously gaining an unfair advantage. He is taking about Mankading. NOT Ashwining There is no point in trying to pass if Ashwining, a con job, as Mankading
mishra Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 6 minutes ago, zen said: See the universal boss’s video for e.g It is choice of bowler. I wont blame or criticisize bowler for or NOT For Mankading. Stop whinning
zen Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 Just now, mishra said: You sure watching the same thing. Dont make up stuff Watched it live. Which you did not in the first place .... and wasted time framing laws not applicable here .... Butler was inside his crease when Ashwin was “expected” to deliver the ball
zen Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 Just now, mishra said: It is choice of bowler. I wont blame or criticisize bowler for or NOT For Mankading. Stop whinning Stop trying to pass off Ashwining as Mankading
mishra Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 1 minute ago, zen said: He is taking about Mankading. NOT Ashwining There is no point in trying to pass if Ashwining, a con job, as Mankading But he is saying same thing which is law
zen Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 Just now, mishra said: But he is saying same thing which is law Mankading law. Not Ashwining law, a con job, made to look like Mankading
mishra Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 Just now, zen said: Stop trying to pass off Ashwining as Mankading Agai. Its bowler who decides whether to let go a cheating batsman or shoot him. You dont want bowler to take the bells out, Change the rules
speedheat Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 2 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: Actually this is how you do it. See the bowler warned him first and when butler couldn't resist he took the bails off. However in ashwins case he stopped his car in the middle changed gears and then proceeded to mankand butler. Still I wouldn't blame since its within the rules. Just loving this debate especially some new terms like "ashwining" @zen bhai. Mosher, raki05 and philcric 3
zen Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 Just now, mishra said: Agai. Its bowler who decides whether to let go a cheating batsman or shoot him. You dont want bowler to take the bells out, Change the rules Here the bowler cheated
mishra Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 4 minutes ago, zen said: Here the bowler cheated Who gave him out. Ashwin or umpires? raki05, philcric, profster and 3 others 3 3
zen Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 (edited) 12 minutes ago, mishra said: Who gave him out. Ashwin or umpires? Because of the conjob. Much like an umpire giving someone out claiming a bump catch As I said if you are attempting to pass of Ashwining as Mankading, it will NOT work on people who like to see the right spirit displayed Edited March 26, 2019 by zen
Gollum Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 Still this is dominating the twitter space, IPL got what it needed. But can I have my political updates FGS? Seriously this event has been discussed to death now. Stan AF 1
nevada Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 2 hours ago, zen said: This is not Mankading. But Ashwining, which is a con job made to look like Mankading .... that is if people can understand the difference! A con job to deliver a nasty surprise to a habitual con. Fair and square. flamy and Suhaan 2
CSK Fan Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 1 hour ago, mishra said: Agai. Its bowler who decides whether to let go a cheating batsman or shoot him. You dont want bowler to take the bells out, Change the rules According to BCCI the rules were wrongly interpreted and the match officials failed in their duty. They also have come down heavily on Ashwin https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/ipl/top-stories/ravichandran-ashwin-should-have-maintained-decorum-bcci-official/articleshow/68579388.cms
Recommended Posts