Jump to content

Crimes of NDA-II thread: register your grievances


Gollum

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jimmy Cliff said:

Hope you are right. Let me see if I find anything that debunks this.

Quote

"On the circulation and publication of reports that a separate passport and Naga flag has been accepted by the government of India, Ravi rubbished the reports said, “These are all mischievous rumours. There is nothing in it.”"

http://www.nagalandpost.com/naga-solution-rests-on-flexibilities-ravi/199871.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Major grievance addressed, honestly never expected this. Thought they would touch 35-A and leave the rest. Even that would have been a positive but what happened today has been a dream, one of the most satisfying days as a citizen of this great nation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/5/2019 at 6:17 PM, Gollum said:

Major grievance addressed, honestly never expected this. Thought they would touch 35-A and leave the rest. Even that would have been a positive but what happened today has been a dream, one of the most satisfying days as a citizen of this great nation. 

The way some opposition members (Read Congress) came out against party whip in support of Modis moove only goes to show "Congress Mukt Bharat" is not far.

 

Now back to India. Its time all Libtards (Yes libtards) to come together and completely change their thinking and work with or against Modi Government on Economics. Enough of this caste language region religion BS. Libtards can and should give BJP lectures on economics. A policy shift is needed from libtards. Only problem I see is, Unlike past rulers, Chaivala may simply copy those economics lessons

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Neighbourhood first: Capacity needs to match the commitment

Failure to deliver on commitments has begun to affect New Delhi’s reputation and, in some cases, perversely incentivised neighbours to further deepen their outreach to China

New Delhi has made extraordinary efforts to reconnect with the region in recent years. Under the “neighbourhood first” policy, the mindset changed positively towards connectivity and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s outreach to leaders from Bimstec (Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation) countries for his swearing-in ceremony indicates that there is political will to keep prioritising the region and make further commitments. But beyond good intentions and commitments, India’s real test in the neighbourhood will be to expand its capacity to implement, open its economy, and stop reacting to Chinese inroads.

Slogans aside, credit is due to Modi’s political outreach to the neighbourhood since 2014. Before him, no Indian prime minister had visited Nepal and Sri Lanka on proper bilateral visits since the late 1990s and 1970s, respectively. When Pakistan obstructed India’s connectivity agenda at Saarc (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation), New Delhi pragmatically moved on to cooperate with like-minded neighbours under Bimstec and BBIN (a sub-regional grouping of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India and Nepal).

Land boundary and shipping agreements were finally concluded with Bangladesh, which hosted the first-ever visit of an Indian defence minister in 2016. India also became a net electricity exporter to its neighbours and opened four new Integrated Check Posts (ICPs) to facilitate cross-border trade, with 13 more planned on the borders with Nepal, Bangladesh and Bhutan.

Such initiatives reflect a new focus on the periphery and a growing understanding that Indian economic and security interests can only be achieved through greater regional integration. Even if only belatedly, reacting to China’s sudden appearance in the neighbourhood, New Delhi seems to have finally woken up to connectivity as a strategic imperative. Paradoxically, however, “neighbourhood first” has also exposed tremendous capacity deficiencies. Whether it is the ministry of external affairs (MEA) or several line ministries, the bureaucratic machinery has been struggling more than ever to realise Modi’s bold commitments to neighbours on the ground.

India’s first and foremost challenge will, therefore, be to bridge the growing gap between increasing political commitments and its stagnant administrative capacity to follow up. India will continue to underdeliver until it expands its capacity to implement. Nowhere was this more apparent than in 2016, when Modi announced Bimstec as a priority even while it took India two years to depute its director to the organisation’s secretariat. Failure to deliver on commitments has thus begun to affect New Delhi’s reputation and, in some cases, perversely incentivised neighbours to further deepen their outreach to China.

To reduce this implementation gap, India must start to massively expand its diplomatic cadre at the MEA but, at the same time, also curtail its role as an international gatekeeper. Other ministries, the armed forces and state governments must be given greater autonomy to directly engage with their cross-border counterparts. Another way to speed up implementation would be to appoint a cabinet-ranked prime minister’s special envoy on regional connectivity, with political clout to reach out directly to leaders in neighbouring capitals and overcome bureaucratic hurdles.

Second, as the subcontinent’s predominant power, India’s investment in connectivity will only succeed if there is also economic openness. However much it may hurt, Modi will have to invest political capital for India to lead by example and open up its economy to the neighbours. He alluded to this in 2018, when he emphasised that “India is ready to work as the Sherpa for Nepal”. This may be easy to say, but to concede asymmetric advantages to neighbours will be costly, both at home and abroad, where cross-border mobility will affect protectionist interests and demographic balances. Political leadership will be required to sustain positive discrimination towards Indian neighbours as a strategic investment in interdependence.

This can be pushed through, for example, by eliminating all bureaucratic, tariff, security and any other barriers to trade and transportation between Nepal, Bhutan and Bangladesh through Indian territory. Another would be to adopt the pending Bimstec free trade agreement. In several other areas, New Delhi will fail to connect unless it concedes. Why should Nepal keep begging for more air transport corridors across India or keep its border open according to an outdated bilateral treaty from 1950? And why should the Maldives refrain from further trade liberalisation with China, if India is not able to offer better terms?

Finally, India will have to regain the initiative over China, which is now a resident power in South Asia, whether through its optic fibre connecting Nepal across the Himalayas; the 99-year lease of Sri Lanka’s Hambantota port; or its shareholding in the Dhaka Stock Exchange. While adjusting to Beijing’s growing influence in its backyard, India has often oscillated between the extremes of hopeful inaction, waiting for Chinese initiative to fizzle out, and obsessive obstruction of Chinese projects as alleged security threats. Beyond such short-termism, New Delhi must invest in ways that can shape neighbouring countries’ long-term incentives to connect with India first.

This will require more focus on capacity-building programmes that increase technical self-sufficiency and institutional resilience in neighbouring countries. Let China pay for hard connectivity, and instead explore India’s comparative advantage in cross-border infrastructure, soft connectivity and democratic governance. India will also have to prioritise trilateral partnerships with like-minded Indo-Pacific powers, especially Japan and the United States but also the European Union, if it wants to offer reliable alternatives to China. Finally, if it is serious about regional cooperation beyond just Bimstec, New Delhi will also have to recommit to Saarc to avoid its own diplomatic isolation in the region.

Constantino Xavier is a fellow at Brookings India, New Delhi

 

 

 

https://www.hindustantimes.com/analysis/neighbourhood-first-capacity-needs-to-match-the-commitment/story-R0jKdljegs8gBmWoU8VNqM.htmlhttps://www.hindustantimes.com/analysis/neighbourhood-first-capacity-needs-to-match-the-commitment/story-R0jKdljegs8gBmWoU8VNqM.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, The Dark Horse said:

Time and money spent on making Hindi a single language...

Time waste, 100% agree. Also bad politics, seems like BJP doesn't want to make inroads in South. 

21 hours ago, The Dark Horse said:

talking about Hindus getting converted in Pakistan, etc..

Very important, shame Pakistan internationally, this is leverage we can use in international seminars, meets and forums. Also keep exposing their sinful deeds to show domestic audience the nature of the enemy.  Side by side prepare groundwork for a proper citizenship bill and ease the entry of persecuted minorities in neighboring hellholes. 

21 hours ago, The Dark Horse said:

Focus on the development of our nation 

Yes they should spend more time on this. They are getting diverted very easily these days, that zeal and focus of 2014-15 is missing now. Hope BJP gets its mojo back very soon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The single biggest crime of NDA is the lack of discussion around freeing Hindu temples, mutts, educational institutes, voluntary organizations from govt control. I am saying 'biggest' because they devoted a lot of time to this topic when in opposition...now that they are in power they are suffering from memory loss. All their other pre-poll promises and ideological battles/grievances they have at least pretended to move files or raise voice, pin drop silence when it comes to this. Even in Sabarimala controversy if you remember initially BJP supported the court order to destroy temple tradition....only after backlash by devotees did the snakes do a U-turn. 

Edited by Gollum
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Very important, shame Pakistan internationally, this is leverage we can use in international seminars, meets and forums. Also keep exposing their sinful deeds to show domestic audience the nature of the enemy.  Side by side prepare groundwork for a proper citizenship bill and ease the entry of persecuted minorities in neighboring hellholes. 

I agree, but Pakistan is already on self-destruct mode...we don't need to worry about them..there are already a lot of people in India who are needy...focus on them rather than the hindus of Pakistan or the Tamils of Sri Lanka...I'm not saying don't worry about them..but focus should be on Indians primarily. We have a lot on our plate already. Agree with your other points though.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, rkt.india said:

But where and how? Talking isn't spending money.

In the other thread there is an example...for the PM-SYM scheme, they have literally written the Hindi verse in Tamil as an ad for Tamil newspapers...Those who read Tamil newspapers are very unlikely to understand Hindi...more so if it's written in Tamil text..:giggle: It’s waste of money isn’t it. They could have just translated it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...