Jump to content

Opposition, libtards opposing Citizenship Amendment Bill


Gollum

Recommended Posts

@Stradlater Gehlot is a bigger chewtiya than one can imagine. Rajasthan has so many suffering Hindu migrants from Pak, yet the SOB had the audacity to go against CAA, what's more the resolution against CAA by Rajasthan assembly :facepalm:. How are people from your state taking this insult?

 

Punjab Assembly did the same @Ranvir @Under_Score @Singh bling. Captain is a servile doormat of the Gandhis. Feel for Sikhs from Afg/Pak who fled their homes in the hope of a safer future in India. How can people be ok with betrayal like this? 

Edited by Gollum
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Gollum said:

@Stradlater Gehlot is a bigger chewtiya than one can imagine. Rajasthan has so many suffering Hindu migrants from Pak, yet the SOB had the audacity to go against CAA, what's more the resolution against CAA by Rajasthan assembly :facepalm:. How are people from your state taking this insult?

 

Punjab Assembly did the same @Ranvir @Under_Score @Singh bling. Captain is a servile doormat of the Gandhis. Feel for Sikhs from Afg/Pak who fled their homes in the hope of a safer future in India. How can people be ok with betrayal like this? 

That was a bolt from the blue. It's one thing to oppose a bill to appease your votebank but going all the way to pass a resolution in the legislature despite your state being the host of the most asylum seekers is not only idiotic but showcases the unscrupulous mentality of the Congressi chewts. 

Haramipana is in the blood of con-gressis and our incompetent CM is no exception. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Stradlater said:

That was a bolt from the blue. It's one thing to oppose a bill to appease your votebank but going all the way to pass a resolution in the legislature despite your state being the host of the most asylum seekers is not only idiotic but showcases the unscrupulous mentality of the Congressi chewts. 

Haramipana is in the blood of con-gressis and our incompetent CM is no exception. 

Read an interesting thing on 74.5 and it's significance for Rajasthan 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, diga said:

Read an interesting thing on 74.5 and it's significance for Rajasthan 

 

 

 

 

There were already fighting between Hindu Rajas with each other even before the arrival of Mughals.  And in those fights, Rajputs were killing other Rajputs too. Even Mughals have lot of Rajputs in their armies. 

 

I don't think it is beneficial to look at these wars in light of religion. But sadly, Indian Muslims take pride in their glorious past and admire the Muslim rulers, and now reaction is taking place from the Right Wing Hindu side and all Muslim rulers have been excluded as being Indians. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

 

There were already fighting between Hindu Rajas with each other even before the arrival of Mughals.  And in those fights, Rajputs were killing other Rajputs too. Even Mughals have lot of Rajputs in their armies. 

 

I don't think it is beneficial to look at these wars in light of religion. But sadly, Indian Muslims take pride in their glorious past and admire the Muslim rulers, and now reaction is taking place from the Right Wing Hindu side and all Muslim rulers have been excluded as being Indians. 

Post some credible sources of the instances in which fighting Rajputs Or other Hindu Rajas massacred each other's population in such a gruesome manner , engaging in deviant acts such as necrophilia of which the Turks were so infamous for. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also @Alam_dar ACTUALLY IT IS PERTINENT TO LOOK AT THESE WARS WITH THE PRISM OF RELIGION. I will explain why. The Turkish soldiers in the armies of invaders who began attacking India were fired by the spirit of defending and spreading Islam. They were mostly volunteers who weren't paid regularly and who made up for their pay by plunder. These were the 'Ghazis'. This Ghazi spirit which was first used for fighting against the non islamic Turks was later used against the Kafirs in India. This is precisely the reason why they went on such a huge temple breaking spree. The prime reason was loot of course but alongside that the complete domination of Islam was desired and this was ensured by the decimation of Institutional structures which represented the culture of kuffar that is Temples. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Stradlater said:

Post some credible sources of the instances in which fighting Rajputs Or other Hindu Rajas massacred each other's population in such a gruesome manner , engaging in deviant acts such as necrophilia of which the Turks were so infamous for. 

 

It is another question who was more cruel, but basics of war is this that all wars are bloody and one human kills another. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashoka

 

According to Ashoka's Major Rock Edict 13, he conquered Kalinga 8 years after his ascension to the throne. The edict states that during his conquest of Kalinga, 100,000 men and animals were killed in action; many times that number "perished"; and 150,000 men and animals were carried away from Kalinga as captives.

 

 

Therefore, it is not a positive thing that people in India are sticking to the Past Events so much that it is effecting their present and the future. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Stradlater said:

Also @Alam_dar ACTUALLY IT IS PERTINENT TO LOOK AT THESE WARS WITH THE PRISM OF RELIGION. I will explain why. The Turkish soldiers in the armies of invaders who began attacking India were fired by the spirit of defending and spreading Islam. They were mostly volunteers who weren't paid regularly and who made up for their pay by plunder. These were the 'Ghazis'. This Ghazi spirit which was first used for fighting against the non islamic Turks was later used against the Kafirs in India. This is precisely the reason why they went on such a huge temple breaking spree. The prime reason was loot of course but alongside that the complete domination of Islam was desired and this was ensured by the decimation of Institutional structures which represented the culture of kuffar that is Temples. 

True. 

In past, there was so much injustice everywhere. 

HIndus feel that their ancestors were Mazlooms against the tyrant Muslims. 

But ....

Similar feeling is also found in the South India too, where South Indians feel that the Aryan North invaded their ancestors and driven them to the south. 

 

I am a simple person who does not believe in any race or religion or even nationality. For me I am human first and should take care of all others as humans too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

It is another question who was more cruel, but basics of war is this that all wars are bloody and one human kills another. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashoka

 

According to Ashoka's Major Rock Edict 13, he conquered Kalinga 8 years after his ascension to the throne. The edict states that during his conquest of Kalinga, 100,000 men and animals were killed in action; many times that number "perished"; and 150,000 men and animals were carried away from Kalinga as captives.

 

 

Therefore, it is not a positive thing that people in India are sticking to the Past Events so much that it is effecting their present and the future. 

 

Cool. One example in the 5 thousand year long history. I OTOH can provide you 100 such instances of Islamic armies going all out butchering surrendered soldiers and civilians all alike in a mere span of 200-300 years after Muhammad's death. 

 

Humans have been killing each other since the dawn of the civilizations. It's just that the armies of Islam gave this violence a whole new dimension by perpetrating such ghastly acts of barbarism. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool. One example in the 5 thousand year long history. I OTOH can provide you 100 such instances of Islamic armies going all out butchering surrendered soldiers and civilians all alike in a mere span of 200-300 years after Muhammad's death. 
 
Humans have been killing each other since the dawn of the civilizations. It's just that the armies of Islam gave this violence a whole new dimension by perpetrating such ghastly acts of barbarism. 
Ignore this joker..he is the master of false equivalences...

Sent from my Pixel 3a XL using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/7/2020 at 10:25 PM, mishra said:

All my Assam sources say, First week was done by Muslims.

Not the case at all. 

https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/25-people-were-killed-during-anti-caa-protests-here-are-their-names-114764

 

In Assam the protests were initially carried out by those belonging to tribal communities who were against nationalization of any Bangladeshis, Hindu or Muslim because of fears of economic/demographic swamping. Those killed include Hindus, Muslims and a Christian. Once the tribal communities got to know that certain tribal regions (as mentioned under the sixth schedule of the Constitution) are out of the purview of the CAA, they stopped their stir. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...