sage Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 (edited) Should the IPL introduce rules specially designed to mould/produce certain types of players? Edited December 10, 2020 by sage
velu Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 X-factor not needed .. As long as thala is there , will never get bash points when chasing Khota, sage, raki05 and 2 others 5
sage Posted December 10, 2020 Author Posted December 10, 2020 (edited) We need a rule that punishes 40 (32) type knocks Edited December 10, 2020 by sage nevada, raki05 and velu 2 1
Ajju Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 Why cant they rename X-Factor as Dhoni/Thala Factor
Serpico Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 We need sensible boost. If 1s and 2s makeup for more than 70% of your team score, you get one point
sage Posted December 10, 2020 Author Posted December 10, 2020 8 minutes ago, Serpico said: We need sensible boost. If 1s and 2s makeup for more than 70% of your team score, you get one point So we get less boundaries?
coffee_rules Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 Instead, let’s play bamboozled! Norman 1
sage Posted December 10, 2020 Author Posted December 10, 2020 1 point for team with the least dot balls maybe
saik Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 I don't like the power surge rule. Feel sorry for the bowlers who are already getting bashed so much.
Sean Bradley Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 10/10 to the Bash Creative Team & Directors, IPL is running ahead of Big Bash but its a Lap Behind in terms of Creativity and Innovation. Things like Umpires Camera, Light on Bails, On Field Player Microphone, POV Camera on batsman's head etc. adds to the fun element of a cricket match. raki05 1
bowl_out Posted December 11, 2020 Posted December 11, 2020 11 hours ago, saik said: I don't like the power surge rule. Feel sorry for the bowlers who are already getting bashed so much. How does it make a difference to the bowlers? It is still 6 overs of powerplay
bowl_out Posted December 11, 2020 Posted December 11, 2020 X-factor will confuse captains.. It will help with injury substitutions though... When else will this help?
kosingh Posted December 11, 2020 Posted December 11, 2020 Just making things needlessly messy. It's like a video game.
Vilander Posted December 11, 2020 Posted December 11, 2020 (edited) Aussies as a people in general are known for many good things intelligence is not one of them. Edited December 11, 2020 by Vilander Norman 1
IndianRenegade Posted December 11, 2020 Posted December 11, 2020 2 hours ago, bowl_out said: How does it make a difference to the bowlers? It is still 6 overs of powerplay Let’s say the batting team loses quick wickets at the top. They will probably use the initial overs to consolidate & can delay the PP for a later time when they are more settled & have power hitters, probably at the end. But the final few overs batsman are going to try and look to take risks no matter what. The power surge will help batsmen more, if they kept the the PP overs in the bank. Essentially the batting team get advantage of using the power play latter based on their situation. It isn’t a use it at the top or lose it scenario.
IndianRenegade Posted December 11, 2020 Posted December 11, 2020 3 hours ago, bowl_out said: X-factor will confuse captains.. It will help with injury substitutions though... When else will this help? X-factor is similar to super sub, India used use it well when that was available.
saik Posted December 11, 2020 Posted December 11, 2020 12 hours ago, bowl_out said: How does it make a difference to the bowlers? It is still 6 overs of powerplay Well If the batting side takes the powerplay in the last 2 overs, the bowlers will get murdered. Similar rule was implemented in ODI's in the past and got discarded.
bowl_out Posted December 11, 2020 Posted December 11, 2020 1 hour ago, saik said: Well If the batting side takes the powerplay in the last 2 overs, the bowlers will get murdered. Similar rule was implemented in ODI's in the past and got discarded. Agree with that. They should probably change the time to using the two over powerplay between overs 8-16 saik 1
beetle Posted December 12, 2020 Posted December 12, 2020 On 12/11/2020 at 9:08 AM, IndianRenegade said: Let’s say the batting team loses quick wickets at the top. They will probably use the initial overs to consolidate & can delay the PP for a later time when they are more settled & have power hitters, probably at the end. But the final few overs batsman are going to try and look to take risks no matter what. The power surge will help batsmen more, if they kept the the PP overs in the bank. Essentially the batting team get advantage of using the power play latter based on their situation. It isn’t a use it at the top or lose it scenario. Divide the surge overs between both teams . Bowling team gets to decide one and batting team decides one. The substitute rule is silly .make up your mind and get on the field.This is not gully cricket. Bash boost also is silly because it just ignores the big batting in the later half of the match which is often more entertaining than the first half. saik 1
coffee_rules Posted December 12, 2020 Posted December 12, 2020 (edited) Can we have jokers who play for both teams? one tappa catches? Which Ponting and Michael Clarke have already legalized Edited December 12, 2020 by coffee_rules beetle 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now