Jump to content

3rd T20I (N), Jul 29 2021, India tour of Sri Lanka, 8 PM IST

QuarantineTormentino

By QuarantineTormentino
in Cricket Talk

Recommended Posts

SK_IH Newbie

SK_IH

Posted
Posted
Just now, Bigg Brother said:

I still think we need them, Only Dhawan needs to be excluded. Only Sky-Ishan looks promising as of now. 

Not both for sure, Rohit is ahead because he is a six hitter, which is the demand of this format

Regarding Kohli, Rahul can do what he does more effectively

Lord Grand Master

Lord

Posted
Posted
Just now, Bread_Pitt said:

Replaced by whom? Till last series samson padikkal etc were supposed to be the replacements they were held back coz management was supposed to be so scared of them stealing places. 

Lmao my arse. These chumps cant handle a candle to rohit kohli etc who themselves6are a fading force. Imagine that. 

I repeat sky and maybe kishan are the only ones worth even mentioning 

 

SKY and Kishan 

 

Rohit

Kishan

SKY

Rahul

Pant

Hardik

 

this should be top 6 unless conditions are bowling friendly(not expected in T20)

Bigg Brother Grand Master

Bigg Brother

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

 

https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/world-t20-2015-16-901359/india-vs-new-zealand-13th-match-super-10-group-2-951329/full-scorecard

 

Kohli-Rohit-Dhawan at their peak playing at home in spin friendly condition.

LMAO. This doesnt mean anything. Why posting scorecards from 2016's match? Should I post the scorecard from the match vs Australia. No, I wont. Because that means zilch.

Edited by Bigg Brother
maniac Grand Master

maniac

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

So Paddikal,SKY,Kishan and Rahul Chahar.4 now

 

I think we only disagree on Shaw :two_thumbs_up:


dude i don’t know why you are making this confrontational, did I ever say Shaw is not talented? I only think he is not fit to be playing at the highest level yet. Key word being  yet.

 

I remember people criticizing me about Rohit and Ishant way back before they turned it around 

 

Same thing happened with Rayudu even though he didn’t become a world beater, a lot of haters ended up criticizing  his non-selection in Wc :)

 

I was abused for calling Jadhav a one dimensional player and Dube undeserving of an india cap

 

With Hardik and Shaw I never once said they didn’t have talent or were not good enough . In fact many times I have said I love watching Hardik bat. It’s  just the fact that in Hardik’s case his returns have not equalled the backing and on Shaws case I don’t think you have said anything different than what I have. The fact that you a lot of others agreed with me that a middle aged Sehwag was a better fielder and runner than Shaw, shouldn’t that be a red flag right there ?

 

Sky I was wrong because I thought he was another journeyman like Jadhav. However he seems to have hit a peak and at the ripe age when a batsman reaches his maximum potential. I still feel he will have a steep fall in 2-3 years once teams work him out but by then he will surely win is a lot of big games (hopefully but confident) till 2023 WC

 

I don’t think I have ever criticized Chahar,Paddikal or Kishen in fact during u-19 I used to feel Kishen had better temperament than Pant but now Pant is way ahead there so you never know.

 

Not everything is binary as you know but sure we have some fun with it by going extreme way so all in good fun :icflove:

SK_IH Newbie

SK_IH

Posted
Posted

Each & every batsmen of this lineup played such phattu cricket, there may be three reasons : 

pitch too slow 

or

Bowling too good

or

Batsman just not good enough

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...